Re: [c-nsp] doubt on Mpps

2010-10-10 Thread Mikael Abrahamsson
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010, jack daniels wrote: do u have any doc for the calculation will be of great help. or please explain with example the calculation Facts: There are 8 bits per byte. G means Giga, which is 10^9. 10G is 10^10 bits per second, or 1.25*10^9 bytes. Double that (in+out) is

Re: [c-nsp] doubt on Mpps

2010-10-10 Thread Per Carlson
A networking device handles packets. That indirectly mean they are performance wise bound by the number of packets per second it manages to handle. For example the IP routing task within a router takes the same amount of time regardless the packet size. When calculating how many Mbps a device

Re: [c-nsp] Weird Ping Response Times

2010-10-10 Thread Alexander Clouter
Dominic domi...@broadconnect.ca wrote: Does anybody have any idea what could wrong, or what I should be looking to adjust? Ping (aka ICMP Echo requests) does *not* measure latency, no matter what you may have been led to believe in the past. Cheers -- Alexander Clouter .sigmonster says:

Re: [c-nsp] to shape or not to shape

2010-10-10 Thread Peter Rathlev
On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 17:48 +0200, Roger Wiklund wrote: So my question now, what if the shape the e1 to 1984, we will still have the full speed, but we shape, and thus avoid tail drop, and just delay the packets instead. I'm thinking we avoid TCP restarts etc etc. pros/cons, or am I wrong

Re: [c-nsp] Weird Ping Response Times

2010-10-10 Thread Peter Rathlev
On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 20:35 -0400, Dominic wrote: My voice SBC (Acme Packets) shares the same subnet, and even the same Cisco switch, with a couple of other devices (including a Cisco GSR 12800, Cisco Pix, and a Cisco 7206VXR). When pinging the SBC from non-cisco devices, the response time

Re: [c-nsp] doubt on Mpps

2010-10-10 Thread jack daniels
Thanks Mikael On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.se wrote: On Sun, 10 Oct 2010, jack daniels wrote: do u have any doc for the calculation will be of great help. or please explain with example the calculation Facts: There are 8 bits per byte. G means Giga,

[c-nsp] tracking

2010-10-10 Thread jack daniels
Hi guys, can I configure static route with track option in IOS XR , so as to take out my static route from routing table if next hop (not directly connected) not reachable. Regards ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] tracking

2010-10-10 Thread Ryan West
Google found this pretty quickly. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios_xr_sw/iosxr_r3.7/system_management/configuration/guide/yc37obj.html#wp1040199 -ryan -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of jack daniels

Re: [c-nsp] tracking

2010-10-10 Thread Brad Hedlund (brhedlun)
IOS XR supports BFD for static routes: https://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios_xr_sw/iosxr_r3.3/interfaces/configuration/guide/hc33bfd.html#wp1112516 Brad Hedlund -- Sent from my mobile phone (please excuse brevity, typos) On Oct 10, 2010, at 10:10 AM, jack daniels jckdaniel...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [c-nsp] doubt on Mpps

2010-10-10 Thread Nick Hilliard
On 10/10/2010 06:40, jack daniels wrote: do u have any doc for the calculation will be of great help. or please explain with example the calculation If you like tables, there is plenty of excruciating detail here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_rate_units Nick

[c-nsp] Tunneling / Subscription Management Expert with Good RS Expertise

2010-10-10 Thread Rogelio
A brand new job RS posting on Craigslist, in case anyone here is looking for work http://sfbay.craigslist.org/sby/res/1998682771.html ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at

Re: [c-nsp] tracking

2010-10-10 Thread jack daniels
but in my case neighbouring device is IOS , how to use in this case ? As IOS doesn't support BFD on static route. On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Brad Hedlund (brhedlun) brhed...@cisco.com wrote: IOS XR supports BFD for static routes:

Re: [c-nsp] tracking

2010-10-10 Thread Ryan West
So, what is the other device and what code is it running? BFD for static routes is supported in IOS depending on version. -ryan -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of jack daniels Sent: Sunday, October 10,

Re: [c-nsp] tracking

2010-10-10 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 10:22:20PM +0530, jack daniels wrote: As IOS doesn't support BFD on static route. It does. (Not all versions, not on all hardware, though). gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!

Re: [c-nsp] tracking

2010-10-10 Thread jack daniels
Thanks for the help guys. It stated in IOS realease 12.2(33)SRC On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote: Hi, On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 10:22:20PM +0530, jack daniels wrote: As IOS doesn't support BFD on static route. It does. (Not all versions, not on all

Re: [c-nsp] tracking

2010-10-10 Thread jack daniels
But 1 more issue my IOS device is 4500 which doesnt support BFD On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 11:35 PM, jack daniels jckdaniel...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for the help guys. It stated in IOS realease 12.2(33)SRC On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote: Hi, On

Re: [c-nsp] tracking

2010-10-10 Thread jack daniels
can I do something with object tracking On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 11:51 PM, jack daniels jckdaniel...@gmail.com wrote: But 1 more issue my IOS device is 4500 which doesnt support BFD On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 11:35 PM, jack daniels jckdaniel...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for the help guys. It

Re: [c-nsp] tracking

2010-10-10 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 11:51:36PM +0530, jack daniels wrote: But 1 more issue my IOS device is 4500 which doesnt support BFD It would be easier to give meaningful advice if you stated your goal right away, instead of asking peacemeal questions - starting with BFD on XR and ending on a

Re: [c-nsp] tracking

2010-10-10 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 11:54:31PM +0530, jack daniels wrote: can I do something with object tracking Maybe. gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany

Re: [c-nsp] 4-byte ASN Support on 7600 SRE2

2010-10-10 Thread Kevin Loch
Gary T. Giesen wrote: Is anyone running SRE2 (or 1) in production on their Cisco 7600s? Any significant gotchas? Currently running SRD4 and I would like to gain 4-byte ASN support.. I might try the SRE train when the latest resolved cveats do not contain things like router will collapse into a

Re: [c-nsp] 4-byte ASN Support on 7600 SRE2

2010-10-10 Thread giesen
Better resolved caveats than unresolved ones =) GG -Original Message- From: Kevin Loch kl...@kl.net Sender: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 21:40:01 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 4-byte ASN Support on 7600 SRE2 Gary T. Giesen wrote: Is