On Tuesday, October 05, 2010 08:17:45 pm Daniel Verlouw
wrote:
late reply, sorry...
yes, an IPv4 BFD down event will tear down the whole
adjacency.
Yes, that's right, actually, since there really is only one
adjacency for both address families, even though there are
multiple address
Since last night one of our 7600s is running SRE2 (ADVIP).
Too early to ascertain what the score is.
On the flip side - we have a 7206VXR running flawlessly for 4 weeks with
SRE2 (ADVIP).
Unfortunately that box is only doing OSPF/LDP/BGP/IPv6(native, not 6PE) and
nothing else, so can't comment on
Rodney, thanks for the correction and feedback.
Is it true then that the ASR1K platform could achieve the same amount of
NAT throughput without severe resource exhaustion much like the ASA? If
so the this would be a viable option for the OP as route-map features
would also be available on
I'll look into getting an ASA. My graphs show about 4 nat
translations at the time the router had issues, would an ASA5510 be
the right choice or would you go with a 5520?
Dan.
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 4:47 AM, Rodney Dunn rod...@cisco.com wrote:
In the spirit of technical accuracy.
NAT
I'm pushing about 30mbit, but we have a content filter that everyone
is force to go through, which essentially doubles the nat entries on
the router (it's just the way it works).
Would we be better off getting two 5510's? and load balancing?
Dan.
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Ryan West
On 10/14/10 8:29 AM, Ge Moua wrote:
Rodney, thanks for the correction and feedback.
Is it true then that the ASR1K platform could achieve the same amount of
NAT throughput without severe resource exhaustion much like the ASA?
CPU and Memory...yes as it's all done in hardware.
If
so the
just that, any recommendation?
services running:
- nat
- eigrp
- bgp
- hsrp
- pim
- cdp
- gre tunnels
- ipsec
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
On 14-10-10 09:40, Alexander Clouter wrote:
SXI4a is working fine on one of our 6500's and I updated from SXI3 to
SXI4a on the other two on Tuesday. No problems so far, although:
Just discovered an interesting bug on SXI4. Take an interface, run
standby version 2 there, create an IPv6 HSRP
Hello,
Gary T. Giesen wrote:
Is anyone running SRE2 (or 1) in production on their Cisco 7600s? Any
significant gotchas? Currently running SRD4 and I would like to gain
4-byte ASN support..
Half year ago tried to switch from SRD3 to SRE and hit problems with
sfp's: even with
Open a tac case please?
On Oct 14, 2010 3:29 PM, Grzegorz Janoszka grzeg...@janoszka.pl wrote:
On 14-10-10 09:40, Alexander Clouter wrote:
SXI4a is working fine on one of our 6500's and I updated from SXI3 to
SXI4a on the other two on Tuesday. No problems so far, although:
Just discovered an
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 6:00 AM, LM asturlui...@gmail.com wrote:
just that, any recommendation?
services running:
- nat
- eigrp
- bgp
- hsrp
- pim
- cdp
- gre tunnels
- ipsec
12.4(15)T -- latest.
Cheers,
Dale
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
Hi,
We have a bunch of 7200's currently terminating dsl tails(Also doing mpls/vrf's
etc) - We are rolling out a new site, and have an initial
requirement(6-12months) to only support ~50 DSL tails, and also have a limited
budget - Are there any alternatives to the 7200's that we can use for
We are doing just this with a couple of 2851's - MPLS/BGP/OSPF/IPv6/NAT for a
small POP. The one 2851 I have in mind is maxed out with 1G third party
approved DRAM and also runs a full BGP table. Initially after boot it takes a
little while to munge the full BGP feed (3 or 4 mins from memory)
We are doing just this with a couple of 2851's - MPLS/BGP/OSPF/IPv6/NAT for a
small POP. The one 2851 I have in mind is maxed out with 1G third party
approved DRAM and also runs a full BGP table. Initially after boot it takes a
little while to munge the full BGP feed (3 or 4 mins from
14 matches
Mail list logo
