Re: [c-nsp] Cellular Modem on Aux

From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gert Doering Sent: 23/10/2010 11:09 To: Peder Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cellular Modem on Aux Hi, On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 04:40:19PM -0500, Peder wrote: router croaks too.

Re: [c-nsp] Monitor class based b/w

--- On Mon, 25/10/10, Vikas Sharma vikasshar...@gmail.com wrote: Usually we monitor b/w of the link to decide whether we need to upgrade the capacity. I want to know if we can monitor the class based b/w i.e. Premium calss or business-class, when reached to threshold, I should get an

Re: [c-nsp] PIX ipv6 neighbour problem

Hello, thanks for your hint concerning the shared interfaces. When I disabled the interface in other contexts, the neighbour-discovery started working again. The Problem occured due to a no mac-address auto in the config. When I changed this to mac-address auto the neighour discovery

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF design

Dear all, Thank you for your replies. We use OSPF basically to advertise each router's loopback so that we can deploy L2 , L3 VPN between routers. There'll be no other external route advertised into OSPF. Thus, we will not configure summarization on any ABR router as well as stubby areas. I

Re: [c-nsp] Preventing host with lower ip to become IGMP querier

Forgot to say, it's Cisco 3560. On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Pavel Dimow paveldi...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have some strange situation (not that I really understand how it works), but I want to prevent device connected to a port to become IGMP querier because it has a lower ip

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF design

If you are doing MPLE TE then you really don't want more than one area as then you get into inter-area TE tunnels which makes TE optimal path selection harder(not possible in some cases). -Ben On Oct 25, 2010, at 4:50 AM, Rin wrote: Dear all, Thank you for your replies. We use OSPF

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF design

Outer label is for label switching to the destination PE, inner label can represent a number of this depending on the technology being deployed (L2/L3/etc). Robert Crowe Email: rocr...@cisco.com -Original Message- From: Heath Jones [mailto:hj1...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010

Re: [c-nsp] Preventing host with lower ip to become IGMP querier

Hi Pavel, I know that you can force which router will become the DR for the network with the ip pim dr-priority command, otherwise the highest ip address wins the election. Does that change which router becomes the querier? Dale Thus spake Pavel Dimow (paveldi...@gmail.com) on Mon, Oct 25,

Re: [c-nsp] VTY access through VRF interface

Just to follow up to this issue, TAC decided this is a bug. I will post back when I get details on bug ID and any other info. On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Jay Nakamura zeusda...@gmail.com wrote: New discovery, no matter what, the router will not let me login to the IP on the serial

Re: [c-nsp] Preventing host with lower ip to become IGMP querier

Hello Dale, ip pim dr-priority is the L3 command. Which I dont have turned on, just plain igmp snooping on per VLAN basic on the 3560. The problem manifest when some device is connected to a port in that VLAN and simply becomes mrouter for that VLAN, which causes that it can receive all multicast

[c-nsp] Bug CSCso74996

Hello group, We have a customer that is migrating from WIC-1ADSL to HWIC-1ADSL-M and now the routers are complaining. The bug seems this one: ++ CSCso74996 Bug Details %SYS-4-CHUNKMALLOCFAIL: Could not allocate chunks for pak subblock c Symptoms: A %SYS-4-CHUNKMALLOCFAIL

Re: [c-nsp] Preventing host with lower ip to become IGMP querier

hey, Forgot to say, it's Cisco 3560. What you are looking for is called multicast router guard http://www.cisco.com/web/about/security/intelligence/multicast_toolkit.html I've pushed cisco to make it available on platforms smaller than 6500 but no success so far. Their general reasoning is

[c-nsp] 6500 Memory Upgrade problems

I have a couple of Supervisor Engine 2 that I need to upgrade memory in order to run the latest IOS and to set them up as redundant SUPs on a 6513. I run in to the following symptoms on both Sups so I figure there must be something I'm missing. Both SUP are part number WS-X6K-SUP2-2GE new

Re: [c-nsp] Preventing host with lower ip to become IGMP querier

Dear Pavel, I have some strange situation (not that I really understand how it works), but I want to prevent device connected to a port to become IGMP querier because it has a lower ip address. I have also made sure to configure profile in order to prevent it for receiving (joining) any

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF design (danger will)

Christopher J. Wargaski war...@gmail.com writes: It just doesn't make sense to run OSPF when all of the links to the remote locations will be running BGP. Actually it does, in some cases. BGP cannot maintain 2 links to the same neighbour, and so it does not work if you have redundant links

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF design (danger will)

On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Benny Amorsen benny+use...@amorsen.dk wrote: Christopher J. Wargaski war...@gmail.com writes: It just doesn't make sense to run OSPF when all of the links to the remote locations will be running BGP. Actually it does, in some cases. BGP cannot maintain 2

[c-nsp] FWSM config-change timestamp

fwsm - ver 3.2(5) in cat 6509-E(12.2 SXI) The last-config-change timestamp in the running-copy of the config reflects the current-time in the following cases: 1) more system:running-config 2) copy running-config to a remote server and open via regular text editor. A sh run in the module has

[c-nsp] PPPoEoA QoS issue

Hi, I am running following configuration on 7206 with IOS - 12.4(15)T10 interface ATM2/0.10856 point-to-point mtu 1500 no ip redirects no ip proxy-arp pvc 1/856 vbr-rt 2048 2048 1 dbs enable encapsulation aal5snap max-reserved-bandwidth 100 protocol pppoe group ft-pppoeoa ! end