Hello,
I would like to run CFM on a Cisco 7600 (IOS 15.1(2)S), but when I use
the command ethernet cfm global, I get the following message:
Apr 21 11:00:56.519: %CFM_CONST-SP-3-MATCH_REG_GLOBAL_RESERVE_FAILED:
Unable to program port ASIC MAC match register on one or more slots.
Cannot run
Thank you
I also heard the trunk can help it. Do you have this experience?
Could you explain to me?
I can't find it in this doc
Thank you
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org wrote:
On 14/04/2011 14:29, Deric Kwok wrote:
How can I increase speed in switch port in
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:21:37AM -0400, Deric Kwok wrote:
I also heard the trunk can help it. Do you have this experience?
Large trunks are always good.
Except if you try to park in crowded cities.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
I have a following setup: http://img534.imageshack.us/img534/7190/lanparty.png
I can manage all the switches + Cisco 2801 router. Cisco 7206VXR is
managed by university IT staff- they will allocate an IP address with
DHCP server to Cisco 2801 Fa0/1. In total, there are 200 hosts in the
LAN
A trunk is an interface that will carry a VLAN tag, it doesn't necessarily
require having a bonded interface.
In Cisco terminology, the keyword you're looking for EtherChannel.
See a description here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EtherChannel
And here:
Did you really daisy chain your switches like that?
mike
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Martin T m4rtn...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a following setup:
http://img534.imageshack.us/img534/7190/lanparty.png
I can manage all the switches + Cisco 2801 router. Cisco 7206VXR is
managed by
The quick easy way with no qos etc?
Connect 2950 to the router. Connect web server to that, with port at 10mbps,
connect 3 ports to a gig switch beneath it as port-channel all at 10 mbits...
then feed each of your LAN party switches from that gig switch ...and the
fileservers too.
End result
Does anyone have experience configuring etherchannel between an IBM Power
750 and a 3560G? We are not able to establish the etherchannels using 4
channel x 3 port configuration. From what the consulting is saying here when
he usually has these set up it never works until the cisco side figures out
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011, Martin T wrote:
The main question is how to allocate guaranteed bandwidth to
WWW-server(~3-4Mbps). There is a camera connected to WWW-server, which
will broadcast the live stream from the event to justin.tv(or similar
site). Is it possible to configure Cisco 2801 in such
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
int fa0/0
service-policy output outgoing
I didn't look at the drawing before sending, this needs to be on fa0/1.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
You've got 'mode desirable' - what etherchannel link aggregation mode do you
need to use for the power 750? Does 'on' like your switch-switch link not work?
From memory, basic mode is fairly often the supported mode rather than pagp et
al
Alan
- Reply message -
From: joshua rayburn
mode desirable in your interface configurations is almost certainly wrong.
That mode enables the Cisco-proprietary PaGP link aggregation mechanism, which
IBM probably doesn't support.
mode active enables standards-compliant LACP.
mode on forces aggregation without any negotiation.
You'll need
Heh... Hard interfaces work well.
If you want to use cisco's rate limiting you can do something like...
---
interface FastEthernet 0/0
description Inside of NAT
[...]
rate-limit output access-group 101 64000 5000 5000 conform-action
transmit exceed-action drop
rate-limit output access-group
I've switched it to active mode to force LACP and now I'm getting LACP
currently not enabled on the remote port. so it looks like my side is good,
thanks for the help all.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:04 PM, christopher.mar...@usc-bt.com wrote:
mode desirable in your interface configurations is
14 matches
Mail list logo
