Dear Zaid,
You can use LACP for port-chanel failure detection if your router supports it.
Thanks Best Regards, Umair SaeedAM IP Operations Core South ,
Pakistan Telecommunication Company Ltd,
Phone # +92 333 2354591
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 06:58:48 -0700
From: zaidoo...@yahoo.com
To:
I was brave (or stupid?) enough to try 15.0(1)SY on sup2t. It appears to
work otherwise ok with our simple setup except IPv6 BGP. The neighbours
remain in the idle state. When enabling debug bgp ipv6 unicast I see the
algo following line in the logs:
nbr global [...] Active open failed - route
On 27/10/11 09:10, Matti Saarinen wrote:
I was brave (or stupid?) enough to try 15.0(1)SY on sup2t. It appears to
work otherwise ok with our simple setup except IPv6 BGP. The neighbours
remain in the idle state. When enabling debug bgp ipv6 unicast I see the
algo following line in the logs:
Phil Mayers wrote:
Hmm. I just tried it with an iBGP neighbor on our test sup2T running
15.0(1)SY (talking to a sup720 running 12.2(33)SXJ1)
Seems to work:
Good to know it's not (completely) broken. Then there's quite likely
something weird in my configs.
Which IOS image are you running?
On 27/10/11 10:45, Matti Saarinen wrote:
Phil Mayers wrote:
Hmm. I just tried it with an iBGP neighbor on our test sup2T running
15.0(1)SY (talking to a sup720 running 12.2(33)SXJ1)
Seems to work:
Good to know it's not (completely) broken. Then there's quite likely
something weird in my
Hello,
We have an ASR9k with A9K-RSP-4G and A9K-8T-L installed.
As per documentation:
There are two fabric interface ASIC on each RSP. Each fabric interface
ASIC provides 40 GB of throughput.
Each line card (LC) has four 23 GB fabric channels on which to send
traffic to the fabric ASICs. The
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011, Anton Turygin wrote:
Does it mean that the A9K-8T-L will use 4x23=92Gbps to send traffic to
the single RSP(limiting by 2x40Gb on the ASICs of the RSP)? Or should we
have both RSPs (active and standby) installed to reach linerate
throughput?
The current generation ASR9K
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:10, Matti Saarinen mjsaa...@cc.helsinki.fi wrote:
nbr global [...] Active open failed - route to peer is invalid
I can ping the neighbour address from the router. Route and CEF tables
agree on where the peer is. What am I missing here? Is there some
specific
The problem is now solved. Thanks to Oliver Boehmer and also others who
helped with this issue.
I had fall-over configured for the v6 neighbours (I don't remember doing
it so perhaps some IOS version had added it automatically). Because
fall-over is not supported for v6 the sessions did not come
This is by design since the WS-6748 cards are for LAN environment. You
would need to use either a SPA module, or better the ES cards:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps368/data_sheet_c78-49152.html
-pavel
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:14 AM, ar ar_...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Guys.
Excuse me for a long delay.
I check all of my configuration on client and BR.
In my lab I have no native 6RD client so I use Windows machine with some
hack.
My client is Windows7 and I use it's 6to4 adapter to emulate 6RD
functionality.
When I assign real IPv4 address to Local Area network
Il 27/10/2011 0.04, John Elliot ha scritto:
Our usual setup would be to have a 2851 + 2960 as active, and
manually copy the config across to the spare 2851+2960, and if one of
the primary fails, it would require swapping cablesnot ideal.
If the 2851s have independent connections to your
Dear folks,
I have an issue with one of our customer service.
Gi0/5
Gi0/27
Gi5/13 Fa3/13
Customer SW Customer Edge Switch-A PE1
--MPLS Core --PE 2--Customer Edge
Your diagram got mangled. I think your PE facing interface has to be a
tunnel as well depending on the type of router you are connected to. Are
you the provider or is the MPLS transport a managed service? Many platforms
have a discard counter that may increment if it's dropping frames because
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Keegan Holley
keegan.hol...@sungard.comwrote:
Your diagram got mangled. I think your PE facing interface has to be a
tunnel as well depending on the type of router you are connected to.
Assuming that the user port was an access port for vlan 1006 before,
I wasn't the original poster. :) The PE platform and configuration is
important here though. It has to know to send double tagged frames from the
remote end. I know for Juniper PE routers we have to turn on q-tunneling on
the switch to get it to work for example.
2011/10/27 Laurent Geyer
Hello Everyone,
We have few wireless devices which connects to Cisco 6500 series router. We
manage those wireless devices by using the trunk ports. We lose the
management connectivity to certain hosts (wireless devices) for few hours
and then it come back up by its own. Interesting thing is that
Try setting the MTU to 1520 and enabling jumbo frames if you can. I had the
same issue with q-in-q not passing dot1q and changing the mtu to 1520 solved it.
---
Brian Raaen
Network Architect
Zcorum
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 06:28:36PM +0200, Gökhan Gümüş wrote:
Dear folks,
I have an issue
Is it possible that the devices stop talking if they don't get any traffic?
So there are two events that happen. One your device disappears, two the
arp times out. They may not be happening at the same time though. Your
network description is kind of vague so I'm not sure where to go from
there.
I've been waiting for my SE to get back to me on this but I wanted to
ping the community to see what has been successfully used in the field.
Proving WAN services in a remote rural area we have several small POP
sites providing minimal customers (some 10 or less).
We are looking to run MPLS
You could take a look at the Metro Ethernet switches. Some of them might
be suitable for your setup.
Regards
Lars Christensen
CCIE #20292
Den 27-10-2011 20:41, Andrew K. skrev:
I've been waiting for my SE to get back to me on this but I wanted to
ping the community to see what has been
On Thu, 2011-10-27 at 13:47 -0400, Faraz Syed wrote:
We have few wireless devices which connects to Cisco 6500 series
router.
s/router/switch/ ;-)
We manage those wireless devices by using the trunk ports. We lose the
management connectivity to certain hosts (wireless devices) for few
hours
Hi,
It would be useful to see your PE configuration and have details of the
hardware and OS versions.
I recently came across an issue like this when using ASR1001s as PEs.
As far as I could tell the ASRs wouldn't match up a double tagged packet
to an interface defined to match a single tag.
http://www-au.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps6537/ps6557/prod_white_paper0900aecd8051fbdc.html
1841 (I would probably not use this in production as a SP)
Also as Lars mentions: ME3600X
Jon Harald Bøvre
Sent from my iPad
On 27. okt. 2011, at 20:59, Lars L. Christensen
On Thu, 2011-10-27 at 14:41 -0400, Andrew K. wrote:
From my digging around the smallest device I can see supporting these
features would be a 2811.
Anyone use anything smaller?
The 2801 will do MPLS too, at least with Enterprise Services or larger
feature set AFAICT.
I assume smaller is
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Andrew K.
Subject: [c-nsp] Smaller MPLS/EoMPLS capable router
From my digging around the smallest device I can see supporting these
features would be a 2811.
Anyone use
Good evening everyone,
We are on the verge of expanding our MPLS core outside several metro areas,
across the pond into London as well as interconnecting the existing metro
areas in the southeast, midwest, and mountain regions in north America.
Today within a metro region we have been using
If the 2851s have independent connections to your core, you can connect
the second 2851 to the first 2960 (and the first 2851 to the second
2960), create the SVI interfaces with the same IP address as the first
2851, and keep them in shutdown.
2851's will connect to the rest of our
Ill second the 1921 i have 4 of them as such a function acting as entry core
routers.
-Blake
On Oct 27, 2011 2:41 PM, Martin Moens mo...@carrier2carrier.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Hi all,
The scenario is that we have two 5520s for this environment configured for
fail-over, these devices currently terminate a whopping 2x L2L IPSec VPNs
and a handful of SSL VPN sessions.
This morning we encountered a strange issue which was originally believed to
be due to ACLs not
Sh activation-key
ASA# sh activation-key
Licensed features for this platform:
Maximum Physical Interfaces : Unlimited perpetual
Maximum VLANs : 150perpetual
Inside Hosts : Unlimited perpetual
Failover :
Hi Simon,
There is no Premium Peers listed, the full output is as follows:
Licensed features for this platform:
Maximum Physical Interfaces: Unlimited
Maximum VLANs : 150
Inside Hosts : Unlimited
Failover : Active/Active
VPN-DES
32 matches
Mail list logo
