Re: [c-nsp] risks of assigning redundant paths on data link layer to end-customer

On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 06:55 +0200, Martin T wrote: Lets assume there is a following setup: http://img844.imageshack.us/img844/9133/stp.png ISP manages R1, C3550-24-A, C-355-24-B and C2950-24-A. Customer-SW is fully under customer control. As you can see, there are two paths to

Re: [c-nsp] ASA vs. ASR for large Wireless NAT deployment ?

Hi, On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 12:59:53PM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote: We've deployed some ASR1006's for NAT44 and NAT64. The NAT44 is for our IPTv VoD service (Unicast), while the NAT64 is for IPv6-only customers trying to reach IPv4-only resources. Can you give some more details on that? You

[c-nsp] control plane traffic monitor

Hi is there away or software to graphically monitor control plane and data plane traffic ? thanks ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at

Re: [c-nsp] risks of assigning redundant paths on data link layer to end-customer

(Hit send too early, sorry! Second paragraph was missing.) On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 06:55 +0200, Martin T wrote: Lets assume there is a following setup: http://img844.imageshack.us/img844/9133/stp.png ISP manages R1, C3550-24-A, C-355-24-B and C2950-24-A. Customer-SW is fully under customer

Re: [c-nsp] control plane traffic monitor

On Nov 22, 2011, at 7:58 AM, zaid wrote: Hi is there away or software to graphically monitor control plane and data plane traffic ? This depends on the platform. Some devices present a 'Control Plane Interface' via SNMP that can be polled. More details would be helpful here. - Jared

[c-nsp] New System Test

I upgraded the system this mailing list is on and wanted to send a test message to make sure things were looking good. If you see any troubles, please let me know by a private email. Thanks! - Jared ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

Re: [c-nsp] control plane traffic monitor

the platform are 7600 ios 12.2 SR and 12000 ios xr 3.9.0  thanks From: Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net To: zaid zaidoo...@yahoo.com Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 4:51 PM Subject: Re: [c-nsp]

Re: [c-nsp] control plane traffic monitor

? You mean SNMP trending? Netflow statistics? Can you be more specific? -Hammer- I was a normal American nerd -Jack Herer On 11/22/2011 06:58 AM, zaid wrote: Hi is there away or software to graphically monitor control plane and data plane traffic ? thanks

[c-nsp] Strange 7200 Ethernet issue over Metro E

So I'm not sure where to start with this one, any pointers would be appreciated. I'd be happy to google but I'm not sure what the condition is here at all, I'm pretty baffled. Here's the setup. A Single 7200 with an NPE400 and a few fast E interfaces. I have two metro Ethernet pretty

[c-nsp] Three ISPs - Three Edge Routers - iBGP Mesh

Two of our DC's are about to get their 3rd internet drop. Each ISP connection has its own edge router. HSRP is running facing on the LAN side. Please see https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3496562#3496562 for topology and further discussions. I expect that packets leaving the DC will hit

Re: [c-nsp] Three ISPs - Three Edge Routers - iBGP Mesh

On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Mark Mason mma...@jackhenry.com wrote: Two of our DC's are about to get their 3rd internet drop. Each ISP connection has its own edge router. HSRP is running facing on the LAN side. Please see https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3496562#3496562 for

Re: [c-nsp] Three ISPs - Three Edge Routers - iBGP Mesh

Mark, I'm not questioning your design, I'm just curious. Why add a third ISP? Redundancy? Is it a capacity issue? I understand having redundancy to two providers but I'm curious why you want a third? Or is this just a carrier thing and I'm thinking from and end customer viewpoint?

[c-nsp] what series router as nas with l2tp to support 2200 ppp users?

HI What series router as nas to support 2200 ppp users? Can I know the estimated price? Thank you ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at

Re: [c-nsp] what series router as nas with l2tp to support 2200 ppp users?

Not sure if you looking for the smallest or largest device to accomplish this but here are two options. We run a 7204VXR (NPE-G1);currently terminates 300 tunnels with 2500 sessions @ 400 megs of aggregate traffic. CPU load is current 65%, max 75%. On the other side of the spectrum we run

[c-nsp] CISCO ASR 5000 . P3 is in need of a consultant....

Please email me regarding a 6 month contract for a Fortune 500 customer. Frank Pecora CEO P3 Systems, Inc. Voip: +1-585-444-8504 / 101 Direct: +1-585-334-2976 Mobile: +1-585-406-1928 www.P3systemsinc.com ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

[c-nsp] MPLS/VPN QoS on asr1001

Hi All. Can someone give me a hint about MPLS/VPN QoS mapping on an asr1001. I have 4 that needs to enablet for QoS, and I'we been looking at some reference guides. I would like to make a shot pipe implementation with five classes. Most all documentation have a mapping between the experimental

Re: [c-nsp] Three ISPs - Three Edge Routers - iBGP Mesh

On 11/22/11 8:41 AM, Mark Mason wrote: Two of our DC's are about to get their 3rd internet drop. Each ISP connection has its own edge router. HSRP is running facing on the LAN side. Please see https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3496562#3496562 for topology and further discussions. I expect

Re: [c-nsp] what series router as nas with l2tp to support 2200 ppp users?

You should be able to pick up a used 7206 w/ a NPE-G1 for a few thousand dollars. On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Andrew K. and...@vianet.ca wrote: Not sure if you looking for the smallest or largest device to accomplish this but here are two options. We run a 7204VXR (NPE-G1);currently

Re: [c-nsp] CISCO ASR 5000 . P3 is in need of a consultant....

On 22/11/2011 15:51, frank Pecora wrote: Please email me regarding a 6 month contract for a Fortune 500 customer. A toilet cleaning contract? I think you got the wrong list for commercial spam, regardless of what type of contract you're talking about. Nick

Re: [c-nsp] what series router as nas with l2tp to support 2200 ppp users?

Hi, There are some others vendors that I think you should be evaluating, just to confirm which is the best option. For this scenario you can check SmartEdge from Ericsson and E-series/MX from Juniper. ASR is a good option as well. Best Regards, Thiago Lizardo Em 22/11/2011, às 14:01, Josh

[c-nsp] IOS 12.2 to 15.1

Hello, Any using IOS 15.1 on a cisco 7206VXR without any issues? Is it ok to go from 12.2 to 15.1? --sharlon ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS/VPN QoS on asr1001

Can someone give me a hint about MPLS/VPN QoS mapping on an asr1001. I have 4 that needs to enablet for QoS, and I'we been looking at some reference guides. I would like to make a shot pipe implementation with five classes. Most all documentation have a mapping between the experimental and

[c-nsp] ME3600 IOS / SPAN

Hi there, Anyone out there tried the new IOS 15.1(2). Currently we are running 12.2(52) and wondering if we should be upgrading it 15.1(2) in production. Release notes mentioned a lot of open caveats rather than the fixed ones. Also has anyone tried port mirroring / SPAN on the ME3600.

Re: [c-nsp] IOS 12.2 to 15.1

We are upgraded from 12.2 into 15.0 in last year, and few months back upgraded to 15.1 to get some new voice features. We are running on NPE-G1. Only thing we notice is because we upgraded from some old 12.2 image have to rewrite some parts of config, which isn't upgraded automatically. On

[c-nsp] Three ISPs - Three Edge Routers - iBGP Mesh

Hammer- Actually were expecting to install 4th and maybe 5th in the far future. Online banking, credit card/debit card processing is our business and having a number of ISP connections provides the least number of hops for our client base, best round-trip, and best customer experience to the

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 IOS / SPAN

We are using 15.1(2)EY, because we wanted some new features. Unfortunately there are still a lot of features missing + some things that don't work well (primarily the -hardcoded- small egress buffers) Also, SPAN is not (currently) supported. Generally whales seems like a nice platform, but

Re: [c-nsp] Three ISPs - Three Edge Routers - iBGP Mesh

Mark Mason wrote: Two of our DC's are about to get their 3rd internet drop. Each ISP connection has its own edge router. HSRP is running facing on the LAN side. Please see https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3496562#3496562 for topology and further discussions. I expect that packets

Re: [c-nsp] Three ISPs - Three Edge Routers - iBGP Mesh

Makes sense. Thank you for the education. -Hammer- I was a normal American nerd -Jack Herer On 11/22/2011 12:33 PM, Mark Mason wrote: Hammer- Actually were expecting to install 4th and maybe 5th in the far future. Online banking, credit card/debit card processing is our business and

Re: [c-nsp] risks of assigning redundant paths on data link layer to end-customer

Peter, thank you for reply! Storm-contol helps here a lot. I set storm-control broadcast level pps 2000 1000 and storm-control multicast level pps 2000 1000 to C2950-24-A port Fa0/24 and C3550-24-B port Fa0/24. In other words to ports which face the Customer-SW. Once the storm-control settings

Re: [c-nsp] IOS 12.2 to 15.1

On 22/11/2011 17:13, Sharlon R. Carty wrote: Any using IOS 15.1 on a cisco 7206VXR without any issues? Is it ok to go from 12.2 to 15.1? I haven't run into any trouble with 15.1 on 7200 yet, but I've found 15.x (both M and T images) to be a bagful of fun on smaller ISRs. In fact, I had an

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 IOS / SPAN

On 22/11/2011 18:44, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote: Unfortunately there are still a lot of features missing + some things that don't work well (primarily the -hardcoded- small egress buffers) Can you elaborate on this? Nick ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

[c-nsp] Cisco 3560X performance in the wild

Greetings all, I was wondering if anyone has used the 3560X-48T switches and would be kind enough to give me the good/bad/ugly on them ? Thanks Dave ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 IOS / SPAN

We migrated from ME-3400 to ME-3800X and we noticed that we started getting output drops on 1G interfaces, while the traffic was ~700 Mbps. I know about bursts and so on, but the same traffic wasn't causing any drops on the older platform. We tried some output shaping service policies under the

[c-nsp] Whales 15.1 (was: ME3600 IOS / SPAN)

While we're on the subject - Has anyone found any interoperability issues with xconnects between FCS 12.2 (and rebuilds) and FCS+1 15.1? We've had one or two issues with 15.1 xconnects not passing traffic between 12.2(52)EY1 xconnects. Our solution was to downgrade 15.1 to 12.2(52) EY2 which

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 3560X performance in the wild

On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 12:59 -0700, Dave wrote: I was wondering if anyone has used the 3560X-48T switches and would be kind enough to give me the good/bad/ugly on them ? We have a couple of WS-C3560X-48T-Ls in use. They seem to function just as well as their 24 port cousins. Any specific things

Re: [c-nsp] risks of assigning redundant paths on data link layer to end-customer

On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 21:49 +0200, Martin T wrote: However, are there some other possibilities for L2 loop? I mean other than filtering out BPDU's in Customer-SW? Filtering BPDUs will generate a loop, that's correct. If there's any chance the customer would do this to you, I really think you

Re: [c-nsp] risks of assigning redundant paths on data link layer to end-customer

2011/11/21 Martin T m4rtn...@gmail.com Lets assume there is a following setup: http://img844.imageshack.us/img844/9133/stp.png ISP manages R1, C3550-24-A, C-355-24-B and C2950-24-A. Customer-SW is fully under customer control. As you can see, there are two paths to Customer-SW. What are

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 3560X performance in the wild

On Nov 22, 2011, at 2:59 PM, Dave dcostell-cisco...@torzo.com wrote: Greetings all, I was wondering if anyone has used the 3560X-48T switches and would be kind enough to give me the good/bad/ugly on them ? Replies to list appreciated. This question just came up for me as well. --Chris

[c-nsp] ME3600 IOS / SPAN

Thanks for the information. Are you saying that we can't push more than 700 Mbps thorugh a GigE interface on the ME3600 switch when running a 15.1(2) version. We are noticing some weird problems with this platform- - Upgraded the software from 12.2(52)EY to 15.1(2)EY and when the switch

Re: [c-nsp] Three ISPs - Three Edge Routers - iBGP Mesh

On 11/22/2011 8:41 AM, Mark Mason wrote: iscussions. I expect that packets leaving the DC will hit the HSRP active, perform the route lookup and exit via the best path BGP has selected (and/or the best path my PfR setup has installed). Does anyone see any gotcha What does the network look

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 3560X performance in the wild

On 11/22/2011 5:15 PM, Peter Rathlev wrote: On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 12:59 -0700, Dave wrote: I was wondering if anyone has used the 3560X-48T switches and would be kind enough to give me the good/bad/ugly on them ? We have a couple of WS-C3560X-48T-Ls in use. They seem to function just as well

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF question / interconnecting ABRs

On 11/21/2011 06:59 PM, Jeff Bacon wrote: Is there some better way to handle this? Or do I just do the virtual-links/dual-connects and accept the hack? Do you actually need areas? How many routes are involved? There's probably 500 routes or so; it's hard to be sure entirely because many

Re: [c-nsp] ADSL sync speed Info at LAC/LNS

Thanks. Does the LAC sends the connect-info by default to LNS? and then LNS sends them to Radius? From: Patrick Cole z...@amused.net To: ar ar_...@yahoo.com Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 9:43 PM