Hi list,
although I'am only seeing a load of ~ 0.2 - 1 Mbps on a 100Mb-link of a
ME3600X,
it's showing some hundred OutDiscards all 1-5 minutes.
#sh int g0/3 count err
PortAlign-Err FCS-ErrXmit-Err Rcv-Err UnderSize
OutDiscards
Gi0/300
On 15/12/2011 1:58 PM, Mark Tinka wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2011 07:33:32 AM Reuben Farrelly wrote:
Yikes. I don't have this problem in my deployment so far as I have
pushed this job onto edge routers to do this function on all
ingress/egress points to our network.
Are you saying you
Christian,
Are you experiencing any microburst? What is the egress or NNI link?
-Waris
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Christian
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 12:38 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Hi list,
We have several catalyst 6500/sup720 12.2(18)SXF17 connected to l2 ring.
All vlans bound to MST0 instance.
One of switch has ring interface in BLK state, and other ring interface
in FWD state.
Several ring vlans has L3 SVI on that switch.
According to MSTP rule, when topology change
Hi Waris,
2011/12/15 Waris Sagheer (waris) wa...@cisco.com
Christian,
Are you experiencing any microburst? What is the egress or NNI link?
I'am not sure how I could figure out if there are any microburst. I'am
seeing those OutDiscards
on nearly any 100Mb Link configured in this ME3600X
Hi List,
Would someone know how (if it's possible) to adjust the volume/gain on a
voice BRI in ccme?
Thanks,
Tim.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
Christian,
On 15/12/2011 10:06, Christian wrote:
I'am not sure how I could figure out if there are any microburst. I'am
seeing those OutDiscards
on nearly any 100Mb Link configured in this ME3600X network.
It does seem unlikely that microbursts are causing this problem, given the
very low
Slightly annoying, but IS-IS doesn't appear to support advertise
passive-only for ipv6 afi on SXI or 15.0M. Is this command supported on
any platform?
It would be Real Nice to have an IS-IS rib with just v6 loopbacks rather
than connected interfaces too.
Nick
Hi all,
We are experiencing a bit of he said she said between a number of
different clients/service providers. The situation is a remote site
(lets say 40.40.40.40) is experiencing connectivity issues to a couple
of hosts within our infrastructure (lets say 10.0.1.10 and
10.0.2.10). I beleive
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 13:06 +0400, Андрей Андреев wrote:
How can i disable svi autostate feature to avoid SVI flaps?
There is no such command in native IOS.
AFAIK you cannot do this in native IOS for the Catalyst switches. CatOS
can do it and some routers can do it. Hopefully some day
What is
Some SVI has OSPF adjacencies and some eBGP to clients.
In period of STP convergence SVI flaps and OSPF/BGP flaps too.
15.12.2011 16:11, Peter Rathlev пишет:
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 13:06 +0400, Андрей Андреев wrote:
How can i disable svi autostate feature to avoid SVI flaps?
There is no such
We've been asked to look at how one could best cram a fair amount of SFP
links into not too much space. They are downlinks to FTTO switches. When
going full scale we're talking about maybe 2500 FTTO switches.
So the question is: How many (1G) SFP switchports can one hope to
terminate in a
Peter,
The 6513E can't support Fabric Enabled Modules in the secondary Supervisor
slot, so you only get 11 6748/6848's.
The 4640-CSFP-E is not supported in the 4510. So you would get 5 per 4506/7,
using the CSFP optics 80 ports per slot.
David
--
http://dcp.dcptech.com
-Original
On Thu, 15 Dec 2011, Peter Rathlev wrote:
So the question is: How many (1G) SFP switchports can one hope to
terminate in a standard rack? And what is the smartest/cheapest/easiet
way to do it?
How much space are you allocating for fiber termination bays and cable
management?
The one issue
On 15/12/11 14:05, David Prall wrote:
Peter,
The 6513E can't support Fabric Enabled Modules in the secondary Supervisor
slot, so you only get 11 6748/6848's.
True with the Sup720.
Not true with the Sup2T, which I would expect anyone to use in a new
deployment, given the favourable pricing.
On 15/12/11 14:30, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
The one issue I've had with very high-density installations is that
people often forget that someone needs to be able to make physical
changes to the rack from time to time, and many peoples' fingers are not
small enough to fumble around in an LC
On Thursday, December 15, 2011 09:44:56 PM Peter Rathlev
wrote:
We've been asked to look at how one could best cram a
fair amount of SFP links into not too much space. They
are downlinks to FTTO switches. When going full scale
we're talking about maybe 2500 FTTO switches.
So the question
On Thursday, December 15, 2011 05:05:43 PM Reuben Farrelly
wrote:
Yes - but not on this platform. I have the switches
within our IGP and the edges (both CPE and at the other
end - transit+peering) are on IOS software based routers
which don't have this problem.
Yes, that's right. We have
On Dec 15, 2011, at 3:06 AM, Андрей Андреев wrote:
How can i disable svi autostate feature to avoid SVI flaps?
There is no such command in native IOS.
Try 'no autostate' on the SVI. It's not a documented command anywhere, think it
might be hit or miss across code trains.
--
Andrew Hoyos
The ASR9k supports only PW-SPAN as a remote SPAN mechanism and my wireshark box
happens to be hanging off of a 3550. That 3550 hangs off of a 7600 and that
7600 hangs off of another ASR9k that would be the PW-SPAN destination for this
particular SPAN session. The connection between the ASR9k
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 16:41 +0400, Андрей Андреев wrote:
Some SVI has OSPF adjacencies and some eBGP to clients.
In period of STP convergence SVI flaps and OSPF/BGP flaps too.
And your STP convergence means that the line-protocol flaps, right? So
it's not the convergence time as such, but
I am in the process of migrating tunnels off an ASAs running 8.2 code
at a customers former data center. The tunnels will be moving to an
another ASA running 8.4.2 code. The vendor side equipment ranges from
ASAs to Junipers and I don’t have access to them. The majority of the
tunnels require
On Dec 15, 2011 11:04 AM, cisco-nsp-requ...@puck.nether.net wrote:
Send cisco-nsp mailing list submissions to
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
or, via email, send a message
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 14:44 +0100, Peter Rathlev wrote:
We've been asked to look at how one could best cram a fair amount of SFP
links into not too much space. They are downlinks to FTTO switches. When
going full scale we're talking about maybe 2500 FTTO switches.
Thank you for all the on and
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 18:45 +0100, Peter Rathlev wrote:
I don't understand why eBGP would flap though. AFAIK, unless you enable
neighbor n.n.n.n fall-over, it shouldn't tear down an eBGP session
just becase the line-protocol drops.
Oh, eBGP. :-)
You can use neighbor n.n.n.n
Does Cisco make any dedicated packet shaper? Does anyone recommend
any other vendors for 100~200mbps bandwidth and deep packet
inspection?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 12:44 -0500, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
Let's assume I setup a PW-SPAN session between ASR1 and ASR2 and drop
the PW-SPAN off on the interface connected to the 7600. Can I just
simply make the 7600 side a SPAN source interface with the destination
being the RSPAN VLAN towards
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Jay Nakamura zeusda...@gmail.com wrote:
Does Cisco make any dedicated packet shaper? Does anyone recommend
any other vendors for 100~200mbps bandwidth and deep packet
inspection?
Cisco SCE. For other vendors look at Sandvine, Arbor, Procera, Ipoque.
Or build
Hi all,
I am currently fighting with the correct way to attach an third party managed
dual homed internal customer to our mpls backbone. (See below for diagram)
Due to license costs we have decided (and I am starting to regret it) using
EIGRP between the customer CEs (6500s) and our two
Hello,
I am looking for a stable, reliable router / Layer3 switch that can do the
following:
-forward at least 1GBit / 1Mpps
-full support of IPv6
-provide NetFlow data or similar for several hundred connected hosts in a
way that can be used for IP-based accounting (including IPv6 and not
Rolf,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Rolf Hanßen n...@rhanssen.de wrote:
I am looking for a stable, reliable router / Layer3 switch that can do the
following:
-forward at least 1GBit / 1Mpps
-full support of IPv6
-provide NetFlow data or similar for several hundred connected hosts in a
Hi Rolf,
On 16/12/2011, at 12:25 AM, Rolf Hanßen wrote:
I am looking for a stable, reliable router / Layer3 switch that can do the
following:
-forward at least 1GBit / 1Mpps
-full support of IPv6
-provide NetFlow data or similar for several hundred connected hosts in a
way that can be used
We have customers running the Nexus B22HP (Cisco/HP FEX) and it works pretty
well.
Flex-Whatever sucks. Bowling balls through straws. It's a switch, but not a
switch. It doesn't do QoS. (Flex-NIC bandwidth-limitations work only in one
direction). It doesn't do multi-hop FCoE (no FCoE out of the
Hi Andrew,
just pure forwarding of a few public networks towards each other and
internet with default route.
No tunnels, no NAT, no DHCP, no VPN or something similar.
Concerning relatively cheap: Im searching for below 3000 Euro
absolutely. ;)
regards
Rolf
Hi Rolf,
On 16/12/2011, at 12:25
Hi Rolf,
On 16/12/2011, at 2:09 AM, Rolf Hanßen wrote:
Hi Andrew,
just pure forwarding of a few public networks towards each other and
internet with default route.
No tunnels, no NAT, no DHCP, no VPN or something similar.
Concerning relatively cheap: Im searching for below 3000 Euro
Do you know what the limit to vlans on flexfabric is? As we seem to be running
into an issues with Vlan limits right now and depending on which person/website
I ask depends on the limit.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
On Friday, December 16, 2011 03:38:25 AM Peter Rathlev
wrote:
To sum up the different suggestions:
So based on the features you mentioned, if you're planning
to provide services at the aggregation rack itself, the
SUP2T should be the best way forward (at least in theory).
Many of the
I mean indirect ring link failure.
Assume Switch A (not STP root) detect ring interface DOWN.
Switch A send TCN bpdu on path to root, when root receive TCN bpdu it
send TCA bpdu to all ports.
Switch B (it has ospf and eBGP adjacencies) receive TCA bpdu and put all
not edge stp port on BLK
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:25 AM, Rolf Hanßen n...@rhanssen.de wrote:
I am looking for a stable, reliable router / Layer3 switch that can do the
following:
-forward at least 1GBit / 1Mpps
-full support of IPv6
-provide NetFlow data or similar for several hundred connected hosts in a
way that
39 matches
Mail list logo
