Yes - the 5548 does routing. We have 2x 5548UP's with the Layer 3
daughtercard in our small corporate DC.
It does routing, yes, but you need to be aware of caveats around the
feature. I suppose you could say that about any Cisco switch, but bear
in mind that NX-OS is aimed and targeted at
On (2012-05-19 22:25 -0500), Tony Varriale wrote:
If you follow the rules, those are the easiest, most non-eventful
events ever. I've done over 100 and had no issues.
This is curious statement, it implies that if you are operating devices as
per documentation, nothing ever goes wrong. But I'm
On 5/19/12 11:24 PM, Tony Varriale wrote:
The first and most important question is: Is this a real datacenter?
If so, 3750xyz is not for you.
Yes, it is. Why not?
Also, the regular 4948s are not much better.
We've been using 4948s for years. Never had any issues with them, beyond
the
On Sun, 2012-05-20 at 07:49 -0400, David Coulson wrote:
On 5/19/12 11:24 PM, Tony Varriale wrote:
The first and most important question is: Is this a real datacenter?
If so, 3750xyz is not for you.
Yes, it is. Why not?
I think Tony's question is about wether you actually need to move a
Hi Pete,
I am not pushing line rate on the card; it's maybe doing 20Mb at any given
time.
I think my problem is the type of traffic; it's mostly SIP/RTP traffic and
I am afraid those small packets is what is causing the issues. I went
ahead and tweaked the buffers and cleared the counters. I
I have 3750s, 3750X w/10G, 5010s, 5020s, 5548s, 5596 (soon), VSS 2 *
7010s with dual sups
No problems with 3750
1 problem w 3750X
no problems with any 5Ks other than a power failure during a code upgrade
no problems with VSS
1 or 2 problems with 7Ks - currently waiting for ram upgrade to go to
Browsing cisco.com I found EOS/EOL notices for a few of the 4500E chassis.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong but weren't these released in 2010?
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps4324/eol_c51-706059.html
___
cisco-nsp mailing
On 5/20/2012 3:36 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
On (2012-05-19 22:25 -0500), Tony Varriale wrote:
If you follow the rules, those are the easiest, most non-eventful
events ever. I've done over 100 and had no issues.
This is curious statement, it implies that if you are operating devices as
per
On 5/20/2012 2:49 PM, chris stand wrote:
The ability to reboot a 5K by itself, in fact you can upgrade hardware
this way, vs 3750x stack is a worthwhile positive point.
The ability to separate by distance ... say 100 feet if needed a 5K
from its peer ... another positive point.
What about
On 5/20/2012 9:25 PM, Keegan Holley wrote:
Browsing cisco.com I found EOS/EOL notices for a few of the 4500E chassis.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong but weren't these released in 2010?
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps4324/eol_c51-706059.html
Nah. They are 5-6
Are you sure? The only release bulletin I could find was from 2010 and
that's the year the EOS'd the non-E chassis.
2012/5/20 Tony Varriale tvarri...@comcast.net
On 5/20/2012 9:25 PM, Keegan Holley wrote:
Browsing cisco.com I found EOS/EOL notices for a few of the 4500E
chassis.
Someone
On 5/20/2012 10:54 PM, Keegan Holley wrote:
Are you sure? The only release bulletin I could find was from 2010 and
that's the year the EOS'd the non-E chassis.
They dropped the non-Es for the -Es. Now they're dropping the -Es for
the +Es.
6500 non-Es were dropped even earlier (support runs
Just to provide another data point / opinion...
We have 3560, 3560X, 3750, 3750E, 3750X all deployed, typically as CE
routers. We are moving to 3750s to stack for redundancy.
Most are well-behaved with a few exceptions...
Any of the X-series with a microcode update can take 30 minutes or more
Right, but there was no incremental chassis for the 6509's. From what I
can tell, they released the4500-E's to upgrade from the legacy 6G backplane
to 24G. Then EOS'd them 3 years later when they figured out how to make
the boxes line rate. I'm not sure I see the point in this, but I don't
have
14 matches
Mail list logo
