On 09/04/2012 09:12 AM, Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
As Paul said IGMP register messages are supposed to be handled by the router
elected as designated querier for the local subnet
Though AFAIK IGMP register process is only used by the m-cast receivers not
the sources
For clarity, because I think you
On 09/03/2012 07:12 PM, Mihai Tanasescu wrote:
b) if I put:
10.10.10.1/29 or /32 configured on S on a Loopback interface
and on C4900:
ip route 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.240 192.168.1.2
So, to be clear, you're doing this i.e. trying to source the multicast
from a virtual IP:
Linux:
ip addr
I want to use the SFP port
I have cisco switch 2960 with Version 12.2(50)SE
and I have also GLC-LH-SM SFP transceiver
When I plug the SFP transceiver without anything it gives me an error
%GBIC_SECURITY_CRYPT-4-ID_MISMATCH: Identification check failed for
GBIC in port Gi0/1
On 4 Sep 2012, at 11:45 , Ataklti Teklehaymanot wrote:
I want to use the SFP port
I have cisco switch 2960 with Version 12.2(50)SE
and I have also GLC-LH-SM SFP transceiver
When I plug the SFP transceiver without anything it gives me an error
%GBIC_SECURITY_CRYPT-4-ID_MISMATCH:
On 04/09/12 10:52, Maarten Carels wrote:
On 4 Sep 2012, at 11:45 , Ataklti Teklehaymanot wrote:
I want to use the SFP port
I have cisco switch 2960 with Version 12.2(50)SE
and I have also GLC-LH-SM SFP transceiver
When I plug the SFP transceiver without anything it gives me an error
Oh yes I'm sorry for confusion thank you Phil for pointing that out
What I meant when I said IGMP register messages was actually IGMP membership
report message (commonly known as IGMP joins)
IGMP membership report messages from local subnet are translated by the
designated forwarder into PIM
On 04/09/12 12:00, Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
What I meant when I said IGMP register messages was actually IGMP membership
report message (commonly known as IGMP joins)
Yeah, I guessed that ;o)
Also to clarify
IGMP querier is the router elected by PIM(igmp ver2/3) as a router that
sends IGMP
add extendable keyword for each command.
ip nat inside source static tcp x.x.7.42 1720 interface Loopback12 1720
extendable
Regards,
M. Ahsan Khan.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nasir Shaikh
Sent:
Hi Steve
A few things to check:
1. You have vlan 200 created on the 3524 (the commands you have in the
diagram will be permitted without the actual vlan existing on the switch)
2. You may need to set the q-in-q outer tag on the 3524 with the
following commands on the Fa0/1 port:
Ah I see :) guess I didn't remember that one correctly
So it must have both been PIM responsibilities in IGMPver1 and since
IGMPver2 - PIM is responsible for Designated Forwarder election and IGMP for
Querier election
adam
-Original Message-
From: Phil Mayers
Is there an upper limit on the number of labels in the label stack on Cisco
boxes please? Specifically ASRs and CRSs
It appears there's a limit of on Juniper
Thanks
adam
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
2. You may need to set the q-in-q outer tag on the 3524 with the
following commands on the Fa0/1 port:
switchport mode dot1q-tunnel
switchport access vlan 200
I don't believe the old 3500XL series (including the 3524) support
QinQ. It may *work* :-)
Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting,
Open TAC Case if failed after trying this.
Regards,
M. Ahsan Khan
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of M.Ahsan Khan
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 4:25 PM
To: 'Nasir Shaikh'; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Hi All,
While adding AAA client in ACS there is a filed to put shared secret key which
should be same on AAA client (Router,switch) as well.
In ACS device, shared secret key is appared in plain text, I want to know is
there any way to encrypt this key means shared secret key should be
Hi Reuben,
Thanks for the pointers. I can confirm that vlan 200 has been defined on
the 3524. I can also confirm that the 3524 doesn't support q-in-q and
I'm currently looking for at least a 3550 that may be lurking in stores
somewhere.
However, I'll provide a bit more information on what I'm
Hi all,
I have a situation where I would like to configure bridging on a 7609 from a
normal VLAN interface to a double-tagged WAN interface.
Configuration is like this:
===
int gig7/7
switchport trunk encap dot1g
switchport trunk allowed vlan 202
int gig1/2/4.30570202
encapsulation dot1Q
If you are just talking about stack size, I think your only limit is MTU.
If you are talking about the number of label that can be operated on,
on a single device, that is going to be a limit of the
platform/forwarding engine.
-Pete
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Adam Vitkovsky
Hi
My inside local and inside global are unique addresses so the extendable
keyword doesn't seem to be the solution.
It is the port that the router is complaining about. Looks like it does not
want to use the same port again even if it is associated with a separate IP
address.
Actually
Hi Tony,
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tony
Sent: martedì 4 settembre 2012 15:24
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] bridging to second-dot1 vlan
Hi all,
I have a situation where I
Hi
-Original Message-
From: Nasir Shaikh [mailto:na...@nasirshaikh.com]
Sent: martedì 4 settembre 2012 16:19
To: Brian Turnbow; 'M.Ahsan Khan'; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] NAT issue on ASR1K
Hi Brian,
Thanks for your input.
The router accepts the first two
ce2 can't see ce1's stp config bpdu's.
vtp and cdp are working however.
ce2 and ce1 are connected via a mpls l2vpn (vpws)via me3600x and asr9k.
--
ce1
--
ce1-top-crml#sh
I *can* ping and telnet from ce2 to ce1 over vlan 1...stp just not working.
Appreciate any assistance
Aaron
ce2-realnocsh ip int br vl 1
Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status
Protocol
Vlan1 1.1.1.2 YES manual upup
ce2-realnoc
Hi Brian,
The 3750 would be the device removing the vlan tag
If you want the 6500 to remove the tag the port needs to be an access port,
not a trunk port.
My assumption that the inner tag is not being manipulated properly is based on
sniffing traffic on the 3550 (sorry, it's a 3550, not
Yes you are right I overlooked your statements.
I think you are hitting a bug here, try upgrading your ios as brian
suggested.
Regards,
M. Ahsan Khan.
-Original Message-
From: Nasir Shaikh [mailto:na...@nasirshaikh.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 6:41 PM
To: 'M.Ahsan Khan';
There is a limit how far an LSR can peek into the frame for loadsharing
hash decisions (I recall 10 labels deep on the CRS). Other than that, the
MTU is the limit.
CRS can push a max of 7 labels onto the stack, ASR9k does 6.. Don't think
there is any use-case (yet?) that would need to push that
25 matches
Mail list logo
