Hi Adam,
here's an overview of the L2 Enc boxes for p2p and p2mp setups:
http://www.uebermeister.com/files/inside-it/2011_Market_Overview_Ethernet_En
cryptors_P2P.pdf
http://www.uebermeister.com/files/inside-it/2011_Market_Overview_Ethernet_En
cryptors_Multipoint.pdf
this boxes add overhead
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 12:30:28PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
Cisco docs confuse me...
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/mpls/configuration/guide/mp_static_labels_ps6922_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html
... claims that static label crossconnects should be supported in
Will the Sup720 handle IPIP tunnels in hardware? CCO says(1) GRE tunnels
are hardware-switched, but I haven't seen mention of IPIP tunnels.
Thanks.
-Andy
(1)
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps708/product_data_sheet09186a0080159856.html,
Table 1
Hi CNSP Members,
I work for a provider selling broadband and Metro-E services.
In the IP/MPLS network, I have Cisco CRS as the core router and the outer
layer is populated with Juniper MX480 as PE.We run ISIS as IGP.
On the MX480 i see this config below to make the LDP to follow ISIS
On (2012-10-04 11:02 -0500), Andy Ellsworth wrote:
Will the Sup720 handle IPIP tunnels in hardware? CCO says(1) GRE tunnels
are hardware-switched, but I haven't seen mention of IPIP tunnels.
It will. Infact IPV6 over GRE is not HW, but IPv6 over IP is.
--
++ytti
this seemed funny to mei've never seen this before, but then again I've
never done 6vpe before either...sowhat is meant by this indirectly
connected ?
Aaron
noc-3600#sh ipv ro vrf one
IPv6 Routing Table - one - 5 entries
Codes: C - Connected, L - Local, S - Static, U - Per-user Static
I know this isn't the best place for this but I thought this team might have an
answer for me. I have switches that don't send the interface description with
traps and that makes it hard to tell what the alert is. Now, solarwinds can
poll the device and it has the interface description. The
Hey all,
I've posted this on Cisco's support community yesterday. Lots of views,
no responses so far.
I'm battling an interesting issue on a pair of 7206 NPE-G1 routers running
15.0(1)M9. I've not tried doing active/standby gateways before where
static NAT was involved, but I *think* I
Where are you sending your traps?
The should be sent to solarwinds - and solarwinds should send you a
notification based on that.
Alternatively - you will need to do some scripting.
Sent from a mobile device
On 05/10/2012, at 6:34, Michael Sprouffske msprouff...@yahoo.com wrote:
I know this
The scripting part is what has me stumped as I don't script. Yes I am sending
traps to solar and it receives them just fine. I'm at the point of need help
taking that trap and doing an snmp walk on the cisco device to pull the
description and then add that to the email message.
On 10/4/2012 2:44 PM, cisco-nsp-requ...@puck.nether.net wrote:
From: Andrew Miehs and...@2sheds.de
To: Michael Sprouffske msprouff...@yahoo.com
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Thursday, October 4, 2012 2:37 PM
Subject: Re:
I can ping google's ipv6 dns address but I can't seem to actually browse to
any websites..nor can I resolve names using ipv6
C:\ping 2001:4860:4860::8844
Pinging 2001:4860:4860::8844 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 2001:4860:4860::8844: time=34ms
Reply from 2001:4860:4860::8844:
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:17 PM, e...@kisbey.net wrote:
The routers involved have HSRP on both the WAN and the LAN-side
interfaces, and NAT across the pair with identical NAT statements on each.
To force a full failover in case link is lost on a single interface,
there's a track running for
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Gary T. Giesen gie...@snickers.org wrote:
I've got 2x 7206 VXR/NPE-G1 running 12.2(33) SRE6 acting as LNSs being
passed PPPoE sessions from an incumbent provider via L2TP. A couple
customers (including my personal Internet connection) using Multilink
PPPoE
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Tom Lanyon tom+c-...@oneshoeco.com wrote:
On 28/09/2012, at 4:03 AM, Christian Meutes wrote:
The best way is here really to inject the defaults via ISIS.
Great - that's my current thinking too. I just wanted to double-check that
this was reasonable and I
You should check your DNS resolver.
On Oct 5, 2012 2:12 AM, Aaron aar...@gvtc.com wrote:
I can ping google's ipv6 dns address but I can't seem to actually browse to
any websites..nor can I resolve names using ipv6
C:\ping 2001:4860:4860::8844
Pinging 2001:4860:4860::8844 with 32 bytes
16 matches
Mail list logo