Re: [c-nsp] L2 payload encryption -not p2p

2012-10-04 Thread Thomas Sillaber
Hi Adam, here's an overview of the L2 Enc boxes for p2p and p2mp setups: http://www.uebermeister.com/files/inside-it/2011_Market_Overview_Ethernet_En cryptors_P2P.pdf http://www.uebermeister.com/files/inside-it/2011_Market_Overview_Ethernet_En cryptors_Multipoint.pdf this boxes add overhead

Re: [c-nsp] static MPLS crossconnects and SX* IOS

2012-10-04 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 12:30:28PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote: Cisco docs confuse me... http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/mpls/configuration/guide/mp_static_labels_ps6922_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html ... claims that static label crossconnects should be supported in

[c-nsp] 6500 Sup720 - are IPIP tunnels handled in hardware?

2012-10-04 Thread Andy Ellsworth
Will the Sup720 handle IPIP tunnels in hardware? CCO says(1) GRE tunnels are hardware-switched, but I haven't seen mention of IPIP tunnels. Thanks. -Andy (1) http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps708/product_data_sheet09186a0080159856.html, Table 1

[c-nsp] Cisco-Juniper IGP-LDP Inter-Op

2012-10-04 Thread Amos Thong
Hi CNSP Members, I work for a provider selling broadband and Metro-E services. In the IP/MPLS network, I have Cisco CRS as the core router and the outer layer is populated with Juniper MX480 as PE.We run ISIS as IGP. On the MX480 i see this config below to make the LDP to follow ISIS

Re: [c-nsp] 6500 Sup720 - are IPIP tunnels handled in hardware?

2012-10-04 Thread Saku Ytti
On (2012-10-04 11:02 -0500), Andy Ellsworth wrote: Will the Sup720 handle IPIP tunnels in hardware? CCO says(1) GRE tunnels are hardware-switched, but I haven't seen mention of IPIP tunnels. It will. Infact IPV6 over GRE is not HW, but IPv6 over IP is. -- ++ytti

Re: [c-nsp] 6vpe - me3600x

2012-10-04 Thread Aaron
this seemed funny to mei've never seen this before, but then again I've never done 6vpe before either...sowhat is meant by this indirectly connected ? Aaron noc-3600#sh ipv ro vrf one IPv6 Routing Table - one - 5 entries Codes: C - Connected, L - Local, S - Static, U - Per-user Static

[c-nsp] solarwinds question

2012-10-04 Thread Michael Sprouffske
I know this isn't the best place for this but I thought this team might have an answer for me.  I have switches that don't send the interface description with traps and that makes it hard to tell what the alert is.  Now, solarwinds can poll the device and it has the interface description.  The

[c-nsp] ARP behavior with HSRP and static NAT

2012-10-04 Thread evan
Hey all, I've posted this on Cisco's support community yesterday. Lots of views, no responses so far. I'm battling an interesting issue on a pair of 7206 NPE-G1 routers running 15.0(1)M9. I've not tried doing active/standby gateways before where static NAT was involved, but I *think* I

Re: [c-nsp] solarwinds question

2012-10-04 Thread Andrew Miehs
Where are you sending your traps? The should be sent to solarwinds - and solarwinds should send you a notification based on that. Alternatively - you will need to do some scripting. Sent from a mobile device On 05/10/2012, at 6:34, Michael Sprouffske msprouff...@yahoo.com wrote: I know this

Re: [c-nsp] solarwinds question

2012-10-04 Thread Michael Sprouffske
The scripting part is what has me stumped as I don't script.  Yes I am sending traps to solar and it receives them just fine.  I'm at the point of need help taking that trap and doing an snmp walk on the cisco device to pull the description and then add that to the email message.

Re: [c-nsp] solarwinds question

2012-10-04 Thread Chris Hunt
On 10/4/2012 2:44 PM, cisco-nsp-requ...@puck.nether.net wrote: From: Andrew Miehs and...@2sheds.de To: Michael Sprouffske msprouff...@yahoo.com Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Thursday, October 4, 2012 2:37 PM Subject: Re:

[c-nsp] ipv6 from windows pc

2012-10-04 Thread Aaron
I can ping google's ipv6 dns address but I can't seem to actually browse to any websites..nor can I resolve names using ipv6 C:\ping 2001:4860:4860::8844 Pinging 2001:4860:4860::8844 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 2001:4860:4860::8844: time=34ms Reply from 2001:4860:4860::8844:

Re: [c-nsp] ARP behavior with HSRP and static NAT

2012-10-04 Thread Anton Kapela
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:17 PM, e...@kisbey.net wrote: The routers involved have HSRP on both the WAN and the LAN-side interfaces, and NAT across the pair with identical NAT statements on each. To force a full failover in case link is lost on a single interface, there's a track running for

Re: [c-nsp] Randomly Dead Sessions with MLPPP(oE)

2012-10-04 Thread Anton Kapela
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Gary T. Giesen gie...@snickers.org wrote: I've got 2x 7206 VXR/NPE-G1 running 12.2(33) SRE6 acting as LNSs being passed PPPoE sessions from an incumbent provider via L2TP. A couple customers (including my personal Internet connection) using Multilink PPPoE

Re: [c-nsp] Change BGP default-originate to IGP?

2012-10-04 Thread Anton Kapela
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Tom Lanyon tom+c-...@oneshoeco.com wrote: On 28/09/2012, at 4:03 AM, Christian Meutes wrote: The best way is here really to inject the defaults via ISIS. Great - that's my current thinking too. I just wanted to double-check that this was reasonable and I

Re: [c-nsp] ipv6 from windows pc

2012-10-04 Thread Florin Veres
You should check your DNS resolver. On Oct 5, 2012 2:12 AM, Aaron aar...@gvtc.com wrote: I can ping google's ipv6 dns address but I can't seem to actually browse to any websites..nor can I resolve names using ipv6 C:\ping 2001:4860:4860::8844 Pinging 2001:4860:4860::8844 with 32 bytes