Re: [c-nsp] IP cef load

hi, over 2/ oc3  link ,,, one link carrying 60 M/s the other one carrying 150 at the peak time !! From: Pete Lumbis alum...@gmail.com To: zaid zaidoo...@yahoo.com Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Wednesday, December 5, 2012 9:28

[c-nsp] SMS on 1941 w/ HWIC-3G-HSPA-G?

We have a mobile truck collecting blood donations that uses a 1941 with HWIC-3G-HSPA-G and two 3G SIMs from different providers. This works quite well, no complaints from us. This morning it started logging the following though: %CELLWAN-2-SMS_ARCH_PATH_UNCONFIGURED: Cellular0/0/0 failed to

Re: [c-nsp] 15.1SY draft-rosen MVPN

On 11/19/2012 11:20 PM, Arie Vayner (avayner) wrote: The command should be under the IPv4 address family... Router(config)#vrf definition test Hmm. TAC have been looking at this for me, and apparently the feature is not present in the Advanced IP services image. It is present in the

[c-nsp] ISP Dual AS

Hi All, I have query about ISP Design. Why some ISP`s (Ex: BT) using dual AS`es on their network? What are the advantages of using more than one AS in the ISP network?What can be achieved if you use more than one AS? Thanks,Best Regards, -Mert

Re: [c-nsp] ISP Dual AS

On (2012-12-06 13:54 +0200), mert ozkul wrote: I have query about ISP Design. Why some ISP`s (Ex: BT) using dual AS`es on their network? What are the advantages of using more than one AS in the ISP network?What can be achieved if you use more than one AS? Most often it is result of MA and

Re: [c-nsp] ISP Dual AS

Maybe different as using for different functionality. Do u confirm two as numbers using for the same network. On Dec 6, 2012 7:58 PM, mert ozkul thesoulforged...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi All, I have query about ISP Design. Why some ISP`s (Ex: BT) using dual AS`es on their network? What are the

Re: [c-nsp] ISP Dual AS

Could be some business reasons. This network might have a history of integration. Two ISPs might have merged. Regards, *Ali Sumsam CCIE* *Network Engineer - Level 3* eintellego Pty Ltd a...@eintellego.net ; www.eintellego.net Phone: 1300 753 383 ; Fax: (+612) 8572 9954 Cell +61 (0)410 603 531

Re: [c-nsp] ISP Dual AS

As i faced, the 2 AS using different networks mainly, but of course within ISP environment 2 AS`s networks see and connect each other. I heard because of financial cause, maybe they were using the second AS as a transit AS and selling to the other ISPs as financial reason. However, it can be

Re: [c-nsp] ISP Dual AS

On 6/12/2012 10:54 PM, mert ozkul wrote: Hi All, I have query about ISP Design. Why some ISP`s (Ex: BT) using dual AS`es on their network? What are the advantages of using more than one AS in the ISP network?What can be achieved if you use more than one AS? Thanks,Best Regards, -Mert I

Re: [c-nsp] ISP Dual AS

Maybe a historic reason, merger that has not been fully integrated? Maybe not worth the hassle/interruption of doing the migration to a single AS. Separate realms of control/policy? William Jackson NGN Engineering Gibtelecom Email: william.jack...@gibtele.com -Original Message- From:

Re: [c-nsp] ISP Dual AS

i operate network with some AS. one AS we use for transit traffic and connecting to the upstream, all another use for regional branch -- With best regards, Andrey 'sshd' Petrenko xmmp\gtalk: andy.petrenko at gmail.com skype: andy.petrenko web: http://sshd.by On 06.12.2012, at 15:21, Reuben

Re: [c-nsp] ISP Dual AS

On Thu, 6 Dec 2012, mert ozkul wrote: I have query about ISP Design. Why some ISP`s (Ex: BT) using dual AS`es on their network? What are the advantages of using more than one AS in the ISP network?What can be achieved if you use more than one AS? At my previous job, I ran a network that was

Re: [c-nsp] ISP Dual AS

Hi Mert, AFAIK Tier1 ISPs are using backbone designs with several ASNs mainly for their routing architecture scalability, as well as stability purposes. They also tend to use separate ASNs for different services they offer (inet vs vpn) for manageability reasons In order to cope with network

[c-nsp] WLC with DHCP relay not working on in VRF

Hi, I encountered a problem whereby I have a Guest-LAN placed in the VRF and a guest tries to connect via a WLC which is configured as a dhcp-relay. The guest does not get any IP address assigned by DHCP. Apparently the DHCP server functionality does not work properly in the VRF when a

[c-nsp] Freeing up BGP memory?

Hello all, With three full tables on a SUP720-3BXL (SXI5), memory is getting tight. I removed soft reconfiguration inbound on all peers (and cleared them all), however memory usage is not changed (still about 75% utilized). Does IOS hold onto once-used BGP memory or am I not understanding

Re: [c-nsp] Freeing up BGP memory?

It seemed to me that it holds onto the memory until at the very least that peer is reset/clear-ed, and might until a clear ip bgp * is issued. We recently had a 6506 (same SUP IIRC) go OOM tailspin too. The fault was mine, insufficient monitoring. Had to remove soft reconfig and move some peers

Re: [c-nsp] WLC with DHCP relay not working on in VRF

Hi, Maybe a (no) ip dhcp vrf connected problem ? see https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/631964#631964 vrf in debug output is VRF_Guest and does not find an address-pool so you should define one...; but your config-example's vrf is named Guests -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-

[c-nsp] UCS blade internal vlan fixed range ??

We are looking at using the CISCO UCS blades but we have a problem with the vlan ID we have in use not available on the UCS blade. Is there any way to change the internal VLAN range (3968 to 4048) that is fixed in in the USC blade code? They fixed this problem for the NX-OS to allow it to be

[c-nsp] GRE tunnel over Internet

We are working on setting up a test where we run a GRE tunnel across the Internet, put OSPF between the tunnel and inject routes. I can get OSPF to form an adjacency but i cannot get routes to redistribute, nor inject by a network statement. Anyone do such ? Any help or suggestions would be

Re: [c-nsp] GRE tunnel over Internet

On 06/12/12 17:46, Chris Lane wrote: We are working on setting up a test where we run a GRE tunnel across the Internet, put OSPF between the tunnel and inject routes. I can get OSPF to form an adjacency but i cannot get routes to redistribute, nor inject by a network statement. What platform?

Re: [c-nsp] GRE tunnel over Internet

People run all sorts of routing protocols over the IPSEC/GRE tunnel successfully (yeah, IPSEC to be more secure)...must be some configuration errors then... r/g -lmn On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Chris Lane clane1...@gmail.com wrote: We are working on setting up a test where we run a GRE

Re: [c-nsp] GRE tunnel over Internet

Try debug IP ospf adj could be MTU problem? Jon ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] GRE tunnel over Internet

Do you want to redistribute directly connected networks, statics routes or routes learned through a different routing protocol? Maybe these documents can be helpful. http://www.cisco.com/image/gif/paws/41940/dmvpn.pdf http://www.cisco.com/image/gif/paws/29240/dcmvpn.pdf Alberto -Original

Re: [c-nsp] GRE tunnel over Internet

Was a miss configured network type, once fixed all worked. Thanks to all On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Alberto Cruz alberto.c...@execulink.comwrote: Do you want to redistribute directly connected networks, statics routes or routes learned through a different routing protocol? Maybe these

Re: [c-nsp] UCS blade internal vlan fixed range ??

Hi Jeffrey, You can use vlan 4048 and 4049 as described on the links below but the other vlans are reserved and their allocation cannot be changed. https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2148709

[c-nsp] xconnect on subinterfaces c1841 possible?

Hello all, I'm having some trouble getting xconnects to work on subinterfaces. I have two back-to-back c1841s with a T1 between them, both running c1841-advipservicesk9-mz.124-12. The following config, which uses two untagged ethernet ports works fine: ##working config## ip cef l2tp-class

Re: [c-nsp] UCS blade internal vlan fixed range ??

As I recall it, there is currently no way to change the internal used Vlan range on UCSM (neither via GUI or CLI). Lars Christensen CCIE #20292 Den 06/12/2012 kl. 17.48 skrev Jeffrey G. Fitzwater jf...@princeton.edu: We are looking at using the CISCO UCS blades but we have a problem with

Re: [c-nsp] GRE tunnel over Internet

is it Cisco? what is the statement for redistribution? Are you using key word subnets with the redistribute statement? Regards, *Ali Sumsam CCIE* *Network Engineer - Level 3* eintellego Pty Ltd a...@eintellego.net ; www.eintellego.net Phone: 1300 753 383 ; Fax: (+612) 8572 9954 Cell +61 (0)410

[c-nsp] How is this working..... ASA 5505 inside DHCP?

I have a ASA 5505 running and working. The inside interface is 192.168.1.1/24 but the config shows: interface Vlan192 nameif inside security-level 100 ip address dhcp setroute this 5505 is also the DHCP server for this network and default GW. How in the hey is it working? TIA Scott

Re: [c-nsp] How is this working..... ASA 5505 inside DHCP?

Do you have another DHCP server on the network giving the ASA its correct parameters? On 12/6/2012 6:14 PM, Scott Voll wrote: I have a ASA 5505 running and working. The inside interface is 192.168.1.1/24 but the config shows: interface Vlan192 nameif inside security-level 100 ip

[c-nsp] tracking down sporadic packet loss

I'm having a tough time finding where else to dig for the source of packet loss on what seems like a fairly lightly-loaded network. We have a very simple setup with a 7206/NPE-G2. ___ dot1q dot1q Transit1(Gi0/1)-- -| | trunk trunk

Re: [c-nsp] How is this working..... ASA 5505 inside DHCP?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Scott Voll wrote: I have a ASA 5505 running and working. The inside interface is 192.168.1.1/24 but the config shows: interface Vlan192 nameif inside security-level 100 ip address dhcp setroute this 5505 is also the DHCP server

[c-nsp] L2TP VPDN Getting disconnect and reconnect

Dear All, Is there anyone has experiences with L2TP VPND getting disconnected and reconnect? I have customers who is connecting to my LNS and getting a problem by disconnect and reconnect. but all of my customer have problem only one at the time. And it has log: Log time: Dec 7 12:51:04.785,

Re: [c-nsp] Freeing up BGP memory?

On 12/06/2012 12:03 pm, Michael Loftis wrote: It seemed to me that it holds onto the memory until at the very least that peer is reset/clear-ed, and might until a clear ip bgp * is issued.  We recently had a 6506 (same SUP IIRC) go OOM tailspin too.  The fault was mine, insufficient monitoring.  

Re: [c-nsp] WLC with DHCP relay not working on in VRF

Sorry, I removed the guest lan from the VRF and then typed in the config in the post. The vrf name is/was correct (VRF_Guest) and was the only vrf on the router. I will check out the ip dhcp vrf connected thread but I think that the problem could be solved by adding ip dhcp relay information