[c-nsp] IPv6 prefixes

2013-06-18 Thread Ahmed Hilmy
Hello Friends, At IPv4 prefixes , we advertised with /24 ( maximum prefix length ) At IPv6 prefixes , it will be /48 ? I would like to confirm it ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 prefixes

2013-06-18 Thread Mohammad Khalil
You can start with /32 BR, Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 11:50:42 +0300 From: hilmy...@gmail.com To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] IPv6 prefixes Hello Friends, At IPv4 prefixes , we advertised with /24 ( maximum prefix length ) At IPv6 prefixes , it will be /48 ? I would like to

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 prefixes

2013-06-18 Thread Massimiliano Stucchi
On 6/18/13 10:50 AM, Ahmed Hilmy wrote: Hello Friends, At IPv4 prefixes , we advertised with /24 ( maximum prefix length ) At IPv6 prefixes , it will be /48 ? I would like to confirm it The more you can aggreate, the better it is for everybody. While it's okay (so far) to announce separate

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 prefixes

2013-06-18 Thread Saku Ytti
On (2013-06-18 12:00 +0300), Mohammad Khalil wrote: You can start with /32 You need /48 for PI addresses. -- ++ytti ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 prefixes

2013-06-18 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:50:42AM +0300, Ahmed Hilmy wrote: At IPv4 prefixes , we advertised with /24 ( maximum prefix length ) At IPv6 prefixes , it will be /48 ? I would like to confirm it Cisco routers can announce anything up to a /128. Everyhing else is not a question for

Re: [c-nsp] WS-C4506 dropped links which had LACP enabled under heavy load

2013-06-18 Thread Martin T
Hi, I made a port channel between two switches: http://s23.postimg.org/yx3a6h1i3/port_channel_between_switches.png As you can see, one of those is a WS-C4506. It has a SUP V-10GE. I looped 10GigE ports on SUP which caused heavy CPU load: 99 99 100

Re: [c-nsp] Sup720 hanging after rommon starts loading IOS

2013-06-18 Thread Rolf Hanßen
Hi, now got another annoying card, this one does not boot from bootdisk: -- System Bootstrap, Version 8.5(4) Copyright (c) 1994-2009 by cisco Systems, Inc. Cat6k-Sup720/SP processor with 1048576 Kbytes of main memory Autoboot executing command: boot

[c-nsp] Cat 6500 and QoS for lower bandwidth

2013-06-18 Thread Grischa Stegemann
Dear all During the last weeks I have learned quite a lot about the QoS mechanisms available on the Cat6500 platform. Now I would like to confirm somehow whether I understand one thing correctly: As soon as I have a connection with less bandwidth than the interface line rate connected to the

Re: [c-nsp] Cat 6500 and QoS for lower bandwidth

2013-06-18 Thread Mikael Abrahamsson
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, Grischa Stegemann wrote: Thus there is no way to achieve something like a shaping down to 5MBit/s AND considering the dscp/cos-classes at the same time. You should look into wrr-queue shape, but it's not on the cards you mentioned.

Re: [c-nsp] Cat 6500 and QoS for lower bandwidth

2013-06-18 Thread Grischa Stegemann
On 18.06.13 14:17, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: You should look into wrr-queue shape, but it's not on the cards you mentioned. Yes of course, I forgot to mention this one. But as it is not available on any 10/100/1000-TX-linecard it is no solution in this case. Grischa