Re: [c-nsp] ASR1001 tracelogs

2014-03-24 Thread Christian Deckelmann
Am 23.03.2014 21:41, schrieb Peter Persson: Hey, I've got a odd request and im unable to get it fixed. I got a ASR1001 with a constantly growing tracelogs folder. The space on disk is not an issue, its more of annoying when i get my rancid updates. Do anyone of you have any solution about

Re: [c-nsp] ASR1001 tracelogs

2014-03-24 Thread Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
Isn't that supposed to be solved in some rancid version? http://www.shrubbery.net/rancid/CHANGES rancid: filter filesize and date of tracelogs dir on IOS-XE -- Tassos Peter Persson wrote on 23/03/2014 22:41: Hey, I've got a odd request and im unable to get it fixed. I got a

[c-nsp] 6504-E IOS SSH/memory issues

2014-03-24 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi, all, in Saturday our Rancid started to complain that it could not log on to one of our core/uplink routers, anymore. Yet the system is generally alive and happily pushing packets - Nagios did not ring me about any link or service failing, so this came as a bit of a surprise. Turns out, SSH

Re: [c-nsp] 6504-E IOS SSH/memory issues

2014-03-24 Thread Jared Mauch
On Mar 24, 2014, at 9:16 AM, Patrick M. Hausen hau...@punkt.de wrote: I admit that I rarely log off, but rather just close the window running my SSH connection. Bad admin. ;-) But any sane OS should timeout the TCP connection eventually and then terminate the process waiting on that

Re: [c-nsp] 6504-E IOS SSH/memory issues

2014-03-24 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi, Am 24.03.2014 um 14:28 schrieb Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net: Track if things are holding the wrong amount of memory, eg: Router#show proc mem sorted In my case on a 6500 the BGP Router is the largest. In our case, too. And the router in question is the box with 4 external BGP peers

Re: [c-nsp] 6504-E IOS SSH/memory issues

2014-03-24 Thread Harold 'Buz' Dale
We had a similar problem with a 7609 with a supe720. TAC diagnosed that we were using too much memory for our BGP tables. We would get a login prompt but it would fail even with the correct password. The box seems to be passing packets although we get some BGP peering issues occasionally. This

Re: [c-nsp] 6504-E IOS SSH/memory issues

2014-03-24 Thread Gustav UHLANDER
We have also had the same issue with some of our ASR 1001 boxes running 4 Gig memory and 4 peers 2x V4 and 2x V6. So upgrade of memory on those for us. Reboot frees up enough ram to get them going for a short while but memory upgrade and software upgrade for longterm. Bästa hälsningar / Best

Re: [c-nsp] 6504-E IOS SSH/memory issues

2014-03-24 Thread Mark Tinka
On Monday, March 24, 2014 05:14:13 PM Gustav UHLANDER wrote: We have also had the same issue with some of our ASR 1001 boxes running 4 Gig memory and 4 peers 2x V4 and 2x V6. So upgrade of memory on those for us. Reboot frees up enough ram to get them going for a short while but memory

[c-nsp] Access layer replacement for 6500/Sup720

2014-03-24 Thread Rolf Hanßen
Hello, currently we use C6509 + Sup720 for IP access (routing + switching, ISP environment). Means BGP + OSPF + HSRP, dual stack, no MPLS, no full table (a few hundred routes only). Now I am looking for a small equivalent like a stackable 1HU Layer3 switch. Should have 40/48x 1GBit + 4/8x 10Gbit.

Re: [c-nsp] Access layer replacement for 6500/Sup720

2014-03-24 Thread Mark Tinka
On Monday, March 24, 2014 06:23:02 PM Rolf Hanßen wrote: Are there any other recommendations in that or lower price region? Does not need to be Cisco. What do other ISPs use for such szenarios? If you want reasonably functional QoS ingress and egress, the ME3600X/3800X is your friend. If

Re: [c-nsp] 6504-E IOS SSH/memory issues

2014-03-24 Thread Gustav UHLANDER
Hello. Nop but an old image. Ran it through TAC and they advised to upgrade memory. It was apparently expected behavior with only 4 Gb of ram and 2 full IPV4 feeds and 2 full IPV6 feeds. Bästa hälsningar / Best regards, Gustav Uhlander Senior Communication Infrastructure Engineer Steria

Re: [c-nsp] 6504-E IOS SSH/memory issues

2014-03-24 Thread Mark Tinka
On Monday, March 24, 2014 09:02:25 PM Gustav UHLANDER wrote: Nop but an old image. Ran it through TAC and they advised to upgrade memory. It was apparently expected behavior with only 4 Gb of ram and 2 full IPV4 feeds and 2 full IPV6 feeds. That is very strange. I can hold more views on a

Re: [c-nsp] 6504-E IOS SSH/memory issues

2014-03-24 Thread Lukas Tribus
That is very strange. I can hold more views on a 2GB NPE-G2. Sure, but that NPE-G2 has full access to 2048MB of RAM. When you have a ASR1002 (RP1, 32bit), you don't have more than 1,7GB allocated to IOSd (2GB RAM, the 32-bit per process limit, minus the memory needed for decompressing IOS).

[c-nsp] ADSL and Capacity Used

2014-03-24 Thread Chris Knipe
Hi All, Been googling for a bit now, but this information is seemingly missing my browser. I know that it's not really important, but for my own curiosity and sanity. What Capacity does Capacity Used refer to on a ADSL WIC when issuing the show atm int xxx command? For example: #sh dsl int

Re: [c-nsp] Access layer replacement for 6500/Sup720

2014-03-24 Thread Rolf Hanßen
Hello Mark, If you want reasonably functional QoS ingress and egress, the ME3600X/3800X is your friend. As far as see no stacking and only 2x 10GBit. If you don't care about that (or other fancy features), and if your application is purely closet/LAN and not Metro, then there are lots of

Re: [c-nsp] ADSL and Capacity Used

2014-03-24 Thread Lukas Tribus
Hi, Been googling for a bit now, but this information is seemingly missing my browser. I know that it's not really important, but for my own curiosity and sanity. What Capacity does Capacity Used refer to on a ADSL WIC when issuing the show atm int xxx command? Capacity is the

[c-nsp] CCIE cert

2014-03-24 Thread My Name
Can anyone tell me the rules regarding disassociating their CCIE from their current employer and contracting out to a channel partner? My current employer does not use my cert and they also did not pay for it. Are there any CCIEs out there currently doing this? I would appreciate insight into

Re: [c-nsp] 6504-E IOS SSH/memory issues

2014-03-24 Thread Mark Tinka
On Monday, March 24, 2014 11:45:28 PM Lukas Tribus wrote: You definitely cannot run a full view on a 64-bit ASR1k platform with only 4GB of physical RAM. Which is why I ditched the ASR1001 and went for CSR1000v on Dell servers. Mark. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

Re: [c-nsp] Access layer replacement for 6500/Sup720

2014-03-24 Thread Mark Tinka
On Tuesday, March 25, 2014 01:39:07 AM Rolf Hanßen wrote: Then please tell me some models below 10k EUR that offer 8x10G + 48xRJ45 + stacking and have a reliable self-protection. A basic layer3 switch with 2x 10GBit (that hangs as soon as the cpu is hit by 100k pps) isn't hard to find from