Re: [c-nsp] ifIndex-table

2014-05-20 Thread Antonio Soares
It works. Procedure: Old SUP: #copy nvram:ifIndex-table disk0: New SUP: #delete nvram:ifIndex-table #copy disk0:ifIndex-table nvram: #reload Regards, Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP) amsoa...@netcabo.pt http://www.ccie18473.net -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] Netflow analysis tools?

2014-05-20 Thread Javier Juan
Hi I´ve been always been a Stager´s fan https://trac.uninett.no/stager/ (free) saludos Javier On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Eric Van Tol e...@atlantech.net wrote: -Original Message- From: Gert Doering [mailto:g...@greenie.muc.de] Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 2:15 PM To:

Re: [c-nsp] Netflow analysis tools?

2014-05-20 Thread Joe Loiacono
FlowViewer / SiLK handles IPv6. Web-based, graphical tracking and analysis. Free. http://sourceforge.net/projects/flowviewer/ -- Joe From: Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de To: Eric Van Tol e...@atlantech.net Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Date:

[c-nsp] Nexus 7000 and OTV

2014-05-20 Thread Blake Pfankuch - Mailing List
Looking to deploy OTV between 2 datacenters on some Nexus 7000 equipment. Anyone have any experience with this? Any feedback would be appreciated, good or bad. Thanks, Blake ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 7000 and OTV

2014-05-20 Thread Antonio Soares
No issues with OTV on a stick: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/solutions/Enterprise/Data_Center/DCI/wh itepaper/DCI3_OTV_Intro/DCI_1.html#wp1215970 Regards, Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP) amsoa...@netcabo.pt http://www.ccie18473.net -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp

[c-nsp] MTU packet loss problem 12410 XR and 6509

2014-05-20 Thread Lee Starnes
Hello everyone, A strange MTU issue has popped up and for the life of me I am unable to figure out why. This seems to only affect one Metro-E carrier and only when the traffic passes between the 6500 and the 12410. ME Carrier A --- 10G 6509 bundle-ether1(4G)---12410A ME Carrier B ---/

Re: [c-nsp] MTU packet loss problem 12410 XR and 6509

2014-05-20 Thread Dumitru Ciobarcianu
On 21-May-14 0:00 AM, Lee Starnes wrote: Anybody have any ideas on why matching MTU size would cause no traffic to pass? Ultimately the carrier will need to fix their issue, but I would like to understand why this problem of matched MTU sizes causes no traffic. MTU Behavior on IOS XR and IOS

Re: [c-nsp] MTU packet loss problem 12410 XR and 6509

2014-05-20 Thread Gustav UHLANDER
Hello. In ios-xr the mtu is the L2 mtu while in vanilla ios the mtu is L3 mtu. This gives that XR is including L2 headers in the mtu setting. So in reality you have matching MTUs at present but when you configure XR with an mtu of 1500 you get a mismatch. How is the etherchannel configured?

Re: [c-nsp] MTU packet loss problem 12410 XR and 6509

2014-05-20 Thread James Bensley
Hi Lee, I thought that with these 12400's the MTU setting must include Ethernet headerss (Source, Destination and Ethertype is 14 bytes) so its 1514 for a 1500 byte payload size plus headers. The 6500 is set to 1500 bytes because it adds 14 bytes on for the frame headers. Cheers, James.

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 7000 and OTV

2014-05-20 Thread Martin Clifton
Similar model used here. We have two datacentres (10Km apart) with a common L2. Has been solid for over 3 years. Regards, Martin -Original Message- From: Antonio Soares amsoa...@netcabo.pt Date: Wednesday, 21 May 2014 5:59 am To: 'Blake Pfankuch - Mailing List'