On Sunday, May 25, 2014 10:45:31 PM Dan Brisson wrote:
So I'm looking at basic default routing via BGP, about
75Mb/s of throughput needed, and would like (3) 100mb or
1Gig interfaces. Seems like a 2900 series router would
work but would love to hear what folks think.
If you're looking for
On 26 May 2014, at 3:58 pm, Mark Tinka mark.ti...@seacom.mu wrote:
If you're looking for something really modest, with little
to no opportunity for growth, consider the CSR1000v.
Thats actually a pretty cool idea! I keep forgetting that the thing exists.
Although - however, once I start
On Monday, May 26, 2014 08:39:45 AM Andrew Miehs wrote:
Thats actually a pretty cool idea! I keep forgetting that
the thing exists. Although - however, once I start
looking at software routers, I really wonder whether it
wouldn't be just as effective running a competing
product or even open
On 26/05/2014 4:39 PM, Andrew Miehs wrote:
On 26 May 2014, at 3:58 pm, Mark Tinka mark.ti...@seacom.mu wrote:
If you're looking for something really modest, with little to no
opportunity for growth, consider the CSR1000v.
Thats actually a pretty cool idea! I keep forgetting that the thing
Hello Alejandro,
I think you can only rate-limit on EFPs ingress/egress to/from a particular PW.
adam
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Alejandro Aristizabal
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2014 5:13 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Hi,
saw something interesting today... not a real problem, but it should not
do this. Maybe one of you has seen this and understands what the box is
doing.
Background: there used to be a BGP prefix 195.24.120.0/21, which was
ghosted, and finally it's gone. So, BGP shows it's gone, but it does
Hi,
On Sun, 25 May 2014 04:04:52 +1000, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 08:47:45PM +0300, Artem Viklenko wrote:
we stop to bill per mb and move to bill by bandwidth.
Where exactly is the difference of bill per mb and bill by used
bandwith,
except a
For any of you who directly work with the fiber connectivity side, are you
familiar with PacketLight WDM products ?
I have to add a new DC to our mix and our CWDM solution is insufficiently
flexible.
Thank you,
Chris
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
Just to add a little more, XDR is the component used to send routes from
the supervisor to DFCs across the fabric of a 6500/7600. Generally you'll
need to engage TAC for assistance on this kind of problem.
-Pete
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 5:18 AM, David beckett david.beck...@ch.ibm.comwrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Richard Hartmann
richih.mailingl...@gmail.com wrote:
on ASR9k with IOS XR 4.3.4 I am seeing messages like:
%ROUTING-OSPF-4-BADLENGTH : Invalid length 64765 in OSPF packet from x.x.x.x
(ID
0.0.0.0), TenGigE0/0/2/3
We just had another few of those packets.
Hi Rupesh,
I suggest you first make sure DHCP works properly for the affected CPE.
debug cable mac H.H.H
debug cable dhcp
These should allow you to see DHCP D.O.R.A. for a CPE with MAC H.H.H
The CMTS needs to use leasequery (RFC 4388) if you experienced an outage of
some sort to rebuild its
Hi Folks,
Has anyone encountered an issue where me3600 stops forwarding transit traffic
when LFA repair path is found over a newly enabled interface please?
This is on 15.3(3)S1a a well as on 15.3(3)S2.
Ping to directly connected interfaces works however anything behind the box
either in global
12 matches
Mail list logo
