Re: [c-nsp] 1000BASE-ZX/LH multi-manufacturer interconnection

Livio Zanol Puppim wrote: > *So my question is: Can I connect 2 equipments of different manufactures > using their own manufactured transceiver? Will there be a problem in this > connection?* it's nearly certain to work fine - almost all transceivers use wide-band receivers. But why on earth are

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

Gert Doering wrote: > - for those with classic serial ports, or modem needs, there is a standard >serial console with *standard* layout (read: Cisco RJ45) i'm half expecting the ASR930 (if/when it ever happens) to come with the following: http://i.imgur.com/iCdq3Qt.jpg Nick

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

> On 16/01/2016, at 22:07, CiscoNSP List wrote: > > > Cheers for the replies guys - I'm really interested in the rational behind > moving to USB from traditional RJ45 portsrealestate?boggles the mind. Yeah I presume so. An RJ45 with two USB A holes

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

Hi, On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 12:11:59PM +, Nick Hilliard wrote: > Gert Doering wrote: > > - for those with classic serial ports, or modem needs, there is a standard > >serial console with *standard* layout (read: Cisco RJ45) > > i'm half expecting the ASR930 (if/when it ever happens) to

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ASR920-24SZ-IM BVI Feature Limitations

> So I'm looking to know whether or not I can expect to lose ACL, netflow, QoS > on a 920 BVI the same as I would as a BVI on the Trident based LC's... Not to be pedantic, but it's actually a BDI on the ASR920 - likely not germane to the discussion at hand, but important if you're wondering why

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

Thanks Nathan - I really question Cisco's thought processwhat was "wrong" with the traditional style RJ45 console port? Took up too much realestate?? We have rack kits for them, but Ive only just unpacked 2, found the fun console ports, got that working, and upgraded XE on them

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

> On 16/01/2016, at 23:51, Erik Sundberg wrote: > > My rack mount brackets don't look like that... Interesting! Post a pic? -- Nathan Ward ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

Hi, On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 09:07:00AM +, CiscoNSP List wrote: > Cheers for the replies guys - I'm really interested in the rational behind > moving to USB from traditional RJ45 portsrealestate?boggles the mind. Well, if done properly, it's actually easier to the admins than having

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

Cheers for the replies guys - I'm really interested in the rational behind moving to USB from traditional RJ45 portsrealestate?boggles the mind. From: Nathan Ward Sent: Saturday, 16 January 2016 6:57 PM To: Gert Doering Cc:

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

> On 16/01/2016, at 22:03, CiscoNSP List wrote: > > Thanks Nathan - I really question Cisco's thought processwhat was "wrong" > with the traditional style RJ45 console port? Took up too much realestate?? > > We have rack kits for them, but Ive only just unpacked

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

--- Begin Message --- On 16/01/2016 10:43 PM, Gert Doering wrote: Hi, On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 09:07:00AM +, CiscoNSP List wrote: Cheers for the replies guys - I'm really interested in the rational behind moving to USB from traditional RJ45 portsrealestate?boggles the mind.

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ASR920-24SZ-IM BVI Feature Limitations

On 16/Jan/16 13:57, Eric Van Tol wrote: > > We've been pretty happy with the ASR, especially the models with 4x10G > on-board. The cost is significantly less than an ME3600, even with a full > suite of licenses (Advanced IP Metro, all 10G ports, all GE ports), and the > footprint is much

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

> On 17/01/2016, at 00:03, Erik Sundberg wrote: > > cisco ASR-920-24SZ-M > > Rack mount Brackets -- more like the cisco 2901 rack mount brackets > http://imgur.com/MpXp8li Ahh right, the ASR-920-4SZ-A model (which I have) isn’t as wide, so the brackets take up the

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

Nah... The next model will be console via bluetooth. > On Jan 16, 2016, at 6:27 AM, Gert Doering wrote: > > Hi, > >> On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 12:11:59PM +, Nick Hilliard wrote: >> Gert Doering wrote: >>> - for those with classic serial ports, or modem needs, there is a

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

Cheers Nathan...sane logic appears to have alluded the team responsible for some of these choices From: Nathan Ward Sent: Saturday, 16 January 2016 8:11 PM To: CiscoNSP List Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp]

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

Just finished installing a ASR920 tonight... I had the same issue, just order 6 of those console kits This is really annoying... My rack mount brackets don't look like that... Some changes from Cisco Norm for the ASR920 - No RJ45 console port, very disappointing - The power plug for AC is a

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

cisco ASR-920-24SZ-M Rack mount Brackets -- more like the cisco 2901 rack mount brackets http://imgur.com/MpXp8li This cisco page also show the brackets that I have http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/asr920/hardware/installation/guide/ASR920_HIG/hw_installation.html Power Supplies

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

Here is the port numbering any port layout that I was talking about. Backwards from a ME Switch, but I guess this is a router... Starts lower left with 0 http://imgur.com/qPLXsrI -Original Message- From: Nathan Ward [mailto:cisco-...@daork.net] Sent: Saturday, January 16, 2016 4:54

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ASR920-24SZ-IM BVI Feature Limitations

Doesn't the command "hold-queue 24 out" on physical interface do the same thing ? On 01/16/2016 06:15 PM, James Jun wrote: +1 also, we have several ASR920-24SZ-IM's and 24SZ-M's out in the field and we're very happy with them. Aside from LAG limitations (workaround solution was to not

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ASR920-24SZ-IM BVI Feature Limitations

Adrian Minta wrote: > Doesn't the command "hold-queue 24 out" on physical interface do the > same thing ? No. The hold-queue command only affects traffic going to the router cpu. In the case of a hardware assisted router like an asr920, this will only affect traffic like BGP, OSPF, ISIS,

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ASR920-24SZ-IM BVI Feature Limitations

On 16/Jan/16 19:24, Adrian Minta wrote: > Doesn't the command "hold-queue 24 out" on physical interface do > the same thing ? That's for exception traffic. Mark. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ASR920-24SZ-IM BVI Feature Limitations

On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 03:54:01PM +0200, Mark Tinka wrote: > > On 16/Jan/16 13:57, Eric Van Tol wrote: > > > > > We've been pretty happy with the ASR, especially the models with 4x10G > > on-board. The cost is significantly less than an ME3600, even with a full > > suite of licenses (Advanced