[c-nsp] Classic IOS shared policy instance

I have a particular scenario doing some QoS on classic IOS devices. I have two WAN sub-interfaces part of a physical interface and a service policy defined that shapes the "WAN" to 100M. Is there a way I can make both sub-interfaces derive from this one policy-map. On an ASR9000 I know you can

Re: [c-nsp] ASR-1k 10g Licenses

Throughput is output direction only. As for licensing, there is a certification in that. It is that complicated. Mack McBride | Senior Network Architect | ViaWest, Inc. O: 720.891.2502 | C: 303.720.2711 | mack.mcbr...@viawest.com | www.viawest.com -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] Router 6504E - SUP 720 3B XL

On 19/07/16 11:50, Shawn L wrote: > I've seen ASR-9001S routers on the used market in the US for ~12K Yeah, very similar here in the UK. Brazilian Reals are about 30-31 cents on the USD, so you're talking ~36k in Brazilian terms. OP: definitely worth trying to find a 9001 or 9001-S, even if it

[c-nsp] ASR-1k 10g Licenses

Good afternoon esteemed industry giants, I'm trying to make some kind of head or tail out of the ASR licensing documents, I do not want to buy too much or not enough licensing. I would like to connect an ASR-1001-X to a 10gig handoff, and down to a 10 gig switch. I will be doing some basic

Re: [c-nsp] Router 6504E - SUP 720 3B XL

I've seen ASR-9001S routers on the used market in the US for ~12K On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 2:13 AM, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 08:24:55PM -0300, Estagiario wrote: > > taking advantage of the expereciencia of Lords. > > > > This combination 6505-e +

Re: [c-nsp] N7K M1 card netflow

On 18/07/16 18:26, Phil Mayers wrote: All, Anyone running or wanting to run these, or generally wanting netflow on that platform should have a look at CSCuz04838. TL;DR - CPU and ASIC have different clocks and they're not synced so netflow timestamps are, permanently, wrong. TAC say: I has

Re: [c-nsp] Router 6504E - SUP 720 3B XL

Hi, On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 08:24:55PM -0300, Estagiario wrote: > taking advantage of the expereciencia of Lords. > > This combination 6505-e + SUP720-3BXL + WS-X6704-10GE > > It is better than juniper mx-10 ? (Junos problem is time to convergence and > flaps BGP peers) Sup720 CPU is *slower*