[c-nsp] N5k provider backbone bridging

I know Nexus 5ks do not support straight up provider backbone bridging but is there any way to emulate such a thing? Scenario is thus: Two N5596 uplink to two ASR9000 "Core routers". Any VLAN in this VDC is considered infrastructure. A couple of hosts connect to the N5596 which are VPC'd into

[c-nsp] Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance SNMP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance SNMP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20160817-asa-snmp Revision: 1.0 For Public Release: 2016 August 17 18:45 UTC (GMT

[c-nsp] Cisco Security Advisory:Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller Enterprise Module Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller Enterprise Module Remote Code Execution Vulnerability Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20160817-apic Revision 1.0 Published: 2016 August 17 16:00 GMT

[c-nsp] Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Firepower Management Center Privilege Escalation Vulnerability

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Cisco Firepower Management Center Privilege Escalation Vulnerability Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20160817-firepower Revision 1.0: For Public Release: 2016 August 17 16:00 GMT Summary === A vulnerability in the web-based GUI of Cisco Firepower

[c-nsp] Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Firepower Management Center Remote Command Execution Vulnerability

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Cisco Firepower Management Center Remote Command Execution Vulnerability Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20160817-fmc Revision 1.0 For Public Release: 2016 August 17 16:00 GMT Summary

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco working as PPPoE Server

--- Begin Message --- What is the diference between LNS and BNG? Tks -- Welisson Tomé br.linkedin.com/in/welissontome/ --- End Message --- ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] ACE30 Config

On 16/08/16 13:33, Gert Doering wrote: Hi, On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 02:07:12PM +0200, Chris Knipe wrote: Quick question... I'm about to install my first ACE30 into a 6500 (SUP720)... "don't" We've just pulled ours *out*. I can't imagine why anyone would be deploying them now... Maybe

Re: [c-nsp] ACE30 Config

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/interfaces-modules/services-modules/eol_C51-728979.html Extract from that same page: Customers are encouraged to migrate to the Citrix NetScaler 1000V (offered by Cisco) or alternative vendor offerings. Information about this product can be found

Re: [c-nsp] ACE30 Config

Hi, > Op 16 aug. 2016, om 14:33 heeft Gert Doering het > volgende geschreven: > > Hi, > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 02:07:12PM +0200, Chris Knipe wrote: >> Quick question... I'm about to install my first ACE30 into a 6500 >> (SUP720)... > > "don't" > > It's a dead

Re: [c-nsp] ME3400G EVC / bridge-domain config

> Just found out the hard way indeed. I can create an EVC on > the 3400g, I can put an interface into the EVC but cannot > associate any bridge domain with it. Forget EVC on the 3400 series. Its not real EVC functionality, but some subset of it for OAM/CFM/E-LMI use. > I’m guessing I need a

[c-nsp] Fwd: BGP Syslog-Msg with interface info ?

Hi, Is it somehow possible to include interface info in BGP-syslog Msg ? As it is done e.g. with PIM. Interface-Info is required by our NMS for correct filtering *%PIM-5-NBRCHG: VRF test1: neighbor 1.1.1.1 DOWN on interface GigabitEthernet4/2.15 DR * *BGP: 1.1.1.1 resetting - interface

Re: [c-nsp] ME3400G EVC / bridge-domain config

Hi Rutger, > I have a Q-in-Q tunnel with a few different S-VLANs that I want > to terminate into a bridge-domain, effectively doing EVPN/VPLS > in a single ME box and hiding all customer specific VLAN > information while still bridging. I would like to do > something like: > > interface gi3/1 >

[c-nsp] ME3400G EVC / bridge-domain config

Hi all, I’m struggling with the ME3400G and my google-fu is failing me. I have a Q-in-Q tunnel with a few different S-VLANs that I want to terminate into a bridge-domain, effectively doing EVPN/VPLS in a single ME box and hiding all customer specific VLAN information while still bridging. I

Re: [c-nsp] hardware accelerated ipv6ip tunnels?

On Tue, 16 Aug 2016, Harald Kapper wrote: Hi again, to answer my own question: Hi Could anyone let me know if this tunnel mode is done by PFC/DFC on sup720-3B/3C systems? After some testing it seems we're accelerated in this mode: Tunnel1 Switching pathPkts In Chars In Pkts