Re: [c-nsp] MPLS load-balancing on ME-3800X

Hello all, Thanks for the responses. > I believe the ASR920 is capable of load balancing on egress port channel. It > depends of course on the hashing algorithm but certainly the actual payload > must "contain" several flows that will be identified and will be sent to > different members. >

Re: [c-nsp] Wierd MPLS/VPLS issue

On 13 January 2017 at 02:09, James Bensley wrote: >> The always correct behaviour is entropy or fat + control-word + no >> peek inside pseudowires and balance on labels. > > Hmm me too it seems, I was not suggesting that the control-word will > fix all your problems, as you

Re: [c-nsp] Wierd MPLS/VPLS issue

On 13 January 2017 at 00:02, Saku Ytti wrote: > Thanks, I worded that poorly .. > The always correct behaviour is entropy or fat + control-word + no > peek inside pseudowires and balance on labels. Hmm me too it seems, I was not suggesting that the control-word will fix all your

Re: [c-nsp] Wierd MPLS/VPLS issue

On 13 January 2017 at 01:47, James Bensley wrote: Hey, >> Now some people on the list propose control-word. This does not fix >> the problem in Juniper, it does fix the problem in Cisco (EZChip), >> because Cisco does not have platforms which inspect inside >> pseudowires.

Re: [c-nsp] Wierd MPLS/VPLS issue

On 24 November 2016 at 10:43, Saku Ytti wrote: > Now some people on the list propose control-word. This does not fix > the problem in Juniper, it does fix the problem in Cisco (EZChip), > because Cisco does not have platforms which inspect inside > pseudowires. See Warris' recent

Re: [c-nsp] Bug with IOS-XR and SPAN ports?

On 22 December 2016 at 13:58, wrote: > Hi James, > >> James Bensley >> Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2016 10:06 AM >> >> On 15 December 2016 at 14:00, wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> >> James Bensley >> >> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016

Re: [c-nsp] ASR900 Family

On 12 January 2017 at 10:27, Nicolas KARP wrote: > Hi James, Hi Nicolas, > Cisco told us that we can't terminate a pppoe session on the ASR920 (one > year ago) Yeah as I said, it is not officially supported but the commands are there and worked for us in the lab. > On the

Re: [c-nsp] ASR900 Family

Hi James, I was using an untagged Interface without BDI, a simple Ethernet interface. Can you please share your tests and config ? Thank you. # - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - # - - Nicolas KARP # - - Network

Re: [c-nsp] ASR900 Family

I did some more research and all this is a glorified Metro E Router that is modular. The RSP3Cs only support a max of 192,000 IPV4 Routes. Now I'm looking at the 1006-Xs. I find that the ASR1000 family is not available under the Cisco Power Calculator. Does anyone know a place where I can

Re: [c-nsp] ASR900 Family

James, The PPPoE server "sort" of works. Running over a BDI didn't seem to work properly in my testing which is a requirement for most people to be able to terminate tagged traffic. In your testing were you just using a direct untagged physical interface? Also pppoe client on the 920 seems to

Re: [c-nsp] ASR900 Family

Hi James, Cisco told us that we can't terminate a pppoe session on the ASR920 (one year ago) On the 3.16.4S, you can enable VPDN and pppoe enable group ? We tested on version 3.16.0S but even if the command was there, we were not able to terminate the session on the ASR920. Regarding the

Re: [c-nsp] ASR900 Family

On 12 January 2017 at 08:15, Nicolas KARP wrote: > Hello, > > This router seems to be OK for you needs but be aware that you can't run > PPPoE server on this device. > I hope that one day this feature would be available on this device (ASR900). > > Regards, We lab tested the

Re: [c-nsp] netflow restrictions on ASR920

On 12 January 2017 at 03:14, Nick Cutting wrote: > * FPGA monitor only 1Gbps traffic rate (with minimum frame size of > 100 byte). The accounting is accurate only when the overall traffic monitored > is within 1Gbps. ... > So If I am reading this correctly - my

Re: [c-nsp] ASR900 Family

Hello, This router seems to be OK for you needs but be aware that you can't run PPPoE server on this device. I hope that one day this feature would be available on this device (ASR900). Regards, # - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Re: [c-nsp] netflow restrictions on ASR920

Hi, On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 03:14:24AM +, Nick Cutting wrote: > Am I missing something or this is a bit of an afterthought for this router? It's an amazing addition to a switch. gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!