Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 6500 with SIP-400 ?

2017-01-26 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 01:12:07AM +0100, Olivier CALVANO wrote: > anyone can why we have a "OutSrvc" status ? I'd expect the router to log something at card insertion time that clarifies why it isn't liking the SPA - hardware revision, wrong software version (no _wan?), etc. -- USENET is

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 93108TC-EX Breakout Support

2017-01-26 Thread Tim Stevenson
Hi Nick, please see inline below: At 02:47 PM 1/26/2017 Thursday, Nick Cutting quipped: This is the second generation 10 gig copper leaf switch with 100 gig uplinks. The first generation did not support 40 gig x 10 SFP+ breakouts on the uplinks. I believe this Generation 2 version does -

[c-nsp] Cisco 6500 with SIP-400 ?

2017-01-26 Thread Olivier CALVANO
Hi i have installed a 7600-SIP-400 into a 6500 with SUP720-3BXL, the router see the SIP card Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No. --- - -- -- --- 12 Supervisor Engine 720 (Active)

[c-nsp] Nexus 93108TC-EX Breakout Support

2017-01-26 Thread Nick Cutting
This is the second generation 10 gig copper leaf switch with 100 gig uplinks. The first generation did not support 40 gig x 10 SFP+ breakouts on the uplinks. I believe this Generation 2 version does - (you can run the 100's at 40, and the 40's should support breakouts) I have looked at the

Re: [c-nsp] Stopping MLD responses & protecting CPU from MLD queries

2017-01-26 Thread Saku Ytti
On 26 January 2017 at 18:41, Phil Mayers wrote: > Box-wide though, right? No way to only do this on the IXP interface with MLS > RL. Unfortunately no. I guess per DFC should be possible, unsure if it's supported. -- ++ytti

Re: [c-nsp] Stopping MLD responses & protecting CPU from MLD queries

2017-01-26 Thread Phil Mayers
On 26/01/2017 16:08, Saku Ytti wrote: On 26 January 2017 at 13:54, Phil Mayers wrote: Hey, Worth noting that CoPP on sup720 is done in software for multicast and broadcast. I assume it'll come before MLD processing so would stop the queries arriving and thus replies

Re: [c-nsp] Stopping MLD responses & protecting CPU from MLD queries

2017-01-26 Thread Saku Ytti
On 26 January 2017 at 13:54, Phil Mayers wrote: Hey, > Worth noting that CoPP on sup720 is done in software for multicast and > broadcast. I assume it'll come before MLD processing so would stop the > queries arriving and thus replies being sent, but worth testing. > >

Re: [c-nsp] Stopping MLD responses & protecting CPU from MLD queries

2017-01-26 Thread Phil Mayers
On 26/01/17 08:18, Lukas Tribus wrote: I've been testing workarounds based upon filtering the incoming MLD query, on a 4500 (Cisco 4948E running 15.1(2)SG) and a 6500 (Cisco 6500 w. SUP720-3B running 15.1(2)SY). Control Plane Policing is probably the way to address this (in case MLD cannot

Re: [c-nsp] Stopping MLD responses & protecting CPU from MLD queries

2017-01-26 Thread Enno Rey
Hi, On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 06:35:19PM +, James A. T. Rice wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I'm trying to gather information on how to disable MLD reports for various > Cisco devices in use at IXPs - where MLD queries and reports are often both > prohibited traffic. > > There doesn't seem to be a

Re: [c-nsp] Stopping MLD responses & protecting CPU from MLD queries

2017-01-26 Thread Lukas Tribus
> I've been testing workarounds based upon filtering the incoming MLD > query, on a 4500 (Cisco 4948E running 15.1(2)SG) and a 6500 (Cisco > 6500 w. SUP720-3B running 15.1(2)SY). Control Plane Policing is probably the way to address this (in case MLD cannot be properly disabled, I mean). >