Re: [c-nsp] ASR9010 problem - CRC ERROR - DATA PATH FAILED

What XR version? On Jun 3, 2017 7:47 PM, "Randy via cisco-nsp" wrote: ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9010 problem - CRC ERROR - DATA PATH FAILED

--- Begin Message --- :-) open a case with TAC. fyi - anytime reload-fixes-a-problem; it is a bug. From: Aaron Gould To: 'cisco-nsp' Sent: Saturday, June 3, 2017 4:33 PM Subject: [c-nsp] ASR9010 problem - CRC

[c-nsp] ASR9010 problem - CRC ERROR - DATA PATH FAILED

Any idea why this happened? Serious problems.. Rebooted module, problems stopped. RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:blcn-9k#sh log | in "FABRIC|reset" Sat Jun 3 18:28:12.835 CDT LC/0/0/CPU0:Jun 3 16:11:12.936 : pfm_node_lc[267]: %FABRIC-FIA-1-SUSTAINED_CRC_ERR : Set|fia_lc[151622]|Crossbar

Re: [c-nsp] Load balancing on portchan (4500X->ASR1006)

What type of traffic breakdown? A lot of very small flows? A lot of different src ip addresses? On 6/2/2017 11:21 AM, CiscoNSP List wrote: Hi Everyone - Have a 4 port etherchan between ASR1006/4500X(In VSS) - Tried virtually all the load-balancing options on the 4500X, but port "1" in the

Re: [c-nsp] Load balancing on portchan (4500X->ASR1006)

Hello, I read your mail twice and still don't know which direction is affected (4500X tp ASR or ASR to 4500X or both). Please be aware that the balancing hash method only affects outbound traffic, so changing the method on the 4500X only affects traffic towards the ASR. Using mac adresses for