Hi,
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 07:11:06PM +, Erik Sundberg wrote:
> Cisco is coming out with a ASR9901 with in the next couple months, not sure
> on the release date. I have seen a couple of slides on it.
>
> 2U
[..]
> 1200w power usage
Not sure I should find that impressive or scary...
(Besi
Mark,
> On 4 Aug 2017, at 10:43, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
> On 4/Aug/17 00:52, Łukasz Bromirski wrote:
>>
>> - the ‘HX’ series currently consist only of 1001HX and 1002HX, so both
>> fixed platforms with some modularity included; there are no HX fully
>> modular chassis, so my comment above was misl
Side Note.
Cisco is coming out with a ASR9901 with in the next couple months, not sure on
the release date. I have seen a couple of slides on it.
2U
16x Ports for 1G
24x Ports 1G/10G (Configured in blocks of 4 for 1G or 10G)
2x 100G Ports
2x Tomahawk NPU's
456G Backplane
IOS XR 64bit
Front to b
> On Aug 4, 2017, at 11:31 AM, Phil Mayers wrote:
>
> On 04/08/2017 16:05, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
>
>> ip dhcp relay information option vpn
>> ip dhcp compatibility suboption link-selection standard
>
> That's useful to know - TBH I wasn't even aware this setup was supported on
> routers, it ha
On 04/08/2017 16:05, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
ip dhcp relay information option vpn
ip dhcp compatibility suboption link-selection standard
That's useful to know - TBH I wasn't even aware this setup was supported
on routers, it has been a long time since I've looked at it.
Have you tested to see
> On Aug 4, 2017, at 3:57 AM, Phil Mayers wrote:
>
> On 03/08/17 21:27, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
>>
>>> On Jul 31, 2017, at 12:17 PM, Phil Mayers wrote:
>>>
>>> I guess you could use a dummy relay that added a fake RFC3527 option but
>>> yuck...
>>
>> What do you mean by this, exactly? Relay t
On 4/Aug/17 00:52, Łukasz Bromirski wrote:
>
> - the ‘HX’ series currently consist only of 1001HX and 1002HX, so both
> fixed platforms with some modularity included; there are no HX fully
> modular chassis, so my comment above was misleading in terms of
> 1001HX/1002HX supporting RP3 - they sim
On 3/Aug/17 20:22, Tim Densmore wrote:
> Yeah, this is definitely a piece of the puzzle for some of us. So,
> discussion about the differences between the various RPs aside, what's
> the real world experience with the asr100x and the 9001? It sounds like
> BGP convergence is better on the 9001
On 03/08/17 22:53, Aaron Gould wrote:
I do 1/512 sample rate on my asr9k's and usually multiple numbers gathered
in nfsen by 512 to normalize
sflow? Or netflow?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/list
On 03/08/17 21:27, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
On Jul 31, 2017, at 12:17 PM, Phil Mayers wrote:
I guess you could use a dummy relay that added a fake RFC3527 option but yuck...
What do you mean by this, exactly? Relay to a relay? Didn’t think that was
possible because a relay only accepts broad
10 matches
Mail list logo