Re: [c-nsp] Upgrading from 3.0.6 to Denali-16.3.5b

2018-01-18 Thread Nick Cutting
Big dog mpls multiprocol bgp etc but the fancy stuff is missing Nick Cutting > On Jan 18, 2018, at 5:13 PM, Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN > wrote: > > This message originates from outside of your organisation. > > Hi, > >> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018, at 22:55, Nick

Re: [c-nsp] Upgrading from 3.0.6 to Denali-16.3.5b

2018-01-18 Thread Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
Hi, On Wed, Jan 17, 2018, at 22:55, Nick Cutting wrote: > Denali is where they added MPLS, which is a major overhaul in this "slow > part of the upgrade" - the ASIC programming Is that MPLS like "Label Switching" (in which case it looks like a big WOW on Cat3K) or MPLS like "VRF-Lite" ?

Re: [c-nsp] Upgrading from 3.0.6 to Denali-16.3.5b

2018-01-18 Thread Nick Cutting
Like Tristan - we have not made the Jump to Denali yet either. Most of our 3850's and 3850 stacks are on client sites that do not need the MPLS functionality. I have also no used the rollback command switch at upgrade time -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] Upgrading from 3.0.6 to Denali-16.3.5b

2018-01-18 Thread Tristan Gulyas
Hi, On 3850 multigigabit switches (12X48U, 24XS or 24XU), I'm seeing around 20 minutes from reboot to restoration of service, even on stacks. I seem to recall the 24U models run quicker as they have less ASIC resources for programming. This seems fairly consistent. Are you using TFTP/SCP to