[c-nsp] cat6800 sup6T

2018-07-07 Thread Eli Kagan via cisco-nsp
--- Begin Message --- A follow up on my earlier email. I would appreciate if you could share your real life experience running cat6800 on sup6T. Is the code stable enough? Any peculiar quirks to the hardware?  Any experience out there running quad sup VSS? Thanks again,Eli Forwarded

Re: [c-nsp] choosing a switch.... cat6500 vs cat6800

2018-07-07 Thread Hunter Fuller
The Cat 6807 is, from the admin perspective, a very simple iteration on the 6500. If your admins understand sup 2T in the 6500, they'll understand it in the 6800. It just drops support for old line cards and only takes AC power. On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 18:51 Eli Kagan via cisco-nsp <

Re: [c-nsp] choosing a switch.... cat6500 vs cat6800

2018-07-07 Thread Garrett Skjelstad
We have 20+ 6807 w/ SUP-2Ts and have been running them for 3.5 years. The code has gotten progressively better, admittingly though, it was garbage the first year. Just our experience. On Jul 7, 2018 15:51, "Eli Kagan via cisco-nsp" wrote: -- Forwarded message -- From: Eli

[c-nsp] choosing a switch.... cat6500 vs cat6800

2018-07-07 Thread Eli Kagan via cisco-nsp
--- Begin Message --- Hi everybody, Need your opinion on choosing a switch for an upgrade. I got a bunch of cat4507 sup7-e running right now thatneed to be replaced very soon.  I can’tseem to pick the right platform to replace it with. Cisco is being as confusing as always. My requirements

[c-nsp] IOS-XR cfgmgr-rp process restart

2018-07-07 Thread Curtis Piehler
Trying to google this but can not find actual data. Does anyone know if restarting process cfgmgr-rp is a service impacting operation? For example if I find the process to be utilizing more memory than it should I would like to restart it. Curtis ___