I was waiting for that, lol
Sort of a long story, as everyone knows, networks usually have a story to tell
in order to understand why they are the way they are If many of us sat back
and designed a new network from the ground up, it would be pretty for a day or
two, and then eventually
Quick question as I am clueless on large SP networks (I'm a MSP guy not an ISP
guy )- why not area 0.0.0.0 ?
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Aaron Gould
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 6:08 PM
To: ring...@mail.com
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp]
If you think your network is going to continue to grow , dual route reflector
cluster is a huge must have in my mind, I love how you can add address families
to one neighbor and let it bounce while the other neighbor stays up with all
your routes still there
I have ran a 100 node single area
On 19/Jul/18 21:32, ring...@mail.com wrote:
>
> 1. Is there a better way of doing the HA than having adjacencies to the
> router (can be 3 hops away) over two different VLANs and different OSPF cost
> over trunk links with BFD enabled?
I'd say don't run core links in VLAN's.
What
Thanks!! its a great news for me!
On 12/07/2018 02:27 p.m., Jonathan Stewart wrote:
I've used 10G BiDi optics in a 3064-X, not a real Cisco part, and it
works fine.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Hi all,
I have some practical design questions.
1. Is there a better way of doing the HA than having adjacencies to the router
(can be 3 hops away) over two different VLANs and different OSPF cost over
trunk links with BFD enabled?
2. Do you find less practical a MPLS network on a multi-area
On 18/Jul/18 08:39, Gert Doering wrote:
> If you do this, be aware that every OSPF come-and-go is very likely to lead
> to a churn in BGP, as metrics change. This might or might not be a problem,
> but everything that leads to externally visible BGP updates should be
> considered well.
If I
