Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 is a ticking timebomb (CSCvk35460)

On 25/Jan/19 21:24, Gustav Ulander wrote: > > I'm a little bit interested in the NCS-540 for this segment although the > prefix side is a bit thin. I haven't played with it yet though. > Anyone else run the NCS540 in the Edge role and are there any major > limitations except the 128K ipv4 p

[c-nsp] Quick Script to check the uptime of ASR920's

All, I just created a quick script to check the uptime of a ASR920 via SNMP if you have a fairly long list of devices. It's a simple bash script and snmpwalk version 2c. Figured I would share it with you. Happy Friday Grab the code from GitHub: https://github.com/esundberg/CiscoRouterUptime It'

[c-nsp] VB: ASR920 is a ticking timebomb (CSCvk35460)

-Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: cisco-nsp För Mark Tinka Skickat: den 25 januari 2019 11:11 Till: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Ämne: Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 is a ticking timebomb (CSCvk35460) On 24/Jan/19 21:12, James Jun wrote: > May be this is good time to re-hash discussion about replacin

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 is a ticking timebomb (CSCvk35460)

On 24/Jan/19 21:12, James Jun wrote: > May be this is good time to re-hash discussion about replacing ASR920s with > something else for 1GE aggregation. I don't think that's a good-enough reason to oust the box. It's a bug that "can" be fixed. Focus should be on getting Cisco to see that it's