On 19/02/2019 16:01, James Bensley wrote:
> I looked at 6880 a few years ago,
> I'm pretty sure this was one of the reasons we doing for it it, too
> similar to the 6500 (including this limitation).
I wonder why it's in the docs/supported in the IOS version...
Isn't there a newer gen of
--- Begin Message ---
For completeness sake, if there are a low number of S-VLANs for your use
case then an external loopback cable might suffice.
-Steve
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 9:02 AM James Bensley wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 at 18:14, wrote:
> >
> > > Cat6K and 6880 support QinQ.
> > > We
If there is a way to terminate it directly, let me know, because I'm
pretty sure we still have a cable looping back into the same 6807 to
terminate an inner tag... yikes.
--
Hunter Fuller
Router Jockey
VBH Annex B-5
+1 256 824 5331
Office of Information Technology
The University of Alabama in
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 at 18:14, wrote:
>
> > Cat6K and 6880 support QinQ.
> > We use it to connect some L3 vlans between our DC.
> > I’m not at my desk, but from memory, ..
> > 1) on the access port facing the ‘client’ ….
> > Switchport mode dot1q-tunnel
> > switchport access vlan xxx.Where
You are probably thinking toaster ES20, before ezchip ES20+ (out of
which + nexus fabric they built ASR9k).
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 2:22 PM wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I have a distinct memory of running selective QinQ on a 6500a chassis a
> couple of years back but there where some ASIC limit on it
Hello,
I have a distinct memory of running selective QinQ on a 6500a chassis a
couple of years back but there where some ASIC limit on it where the mapping
done on one interface would affect all ports in a portgroup belonging to
that specific ASIC. Perhaps this feature was removed because of this
On 18/02/2019 23:11, Peter Rathlev wrote:
On Mon, 2019-02-18 at 20:14 +, Tom Hill wrote:
On 14/02/2019 09:01, Christophe Fillot wrote:
Anyone knows if this platform supports QinQ termination ?
The "encapsulation dot1q X second-dot1q Y" command is not present,
but
maybe there is another
