Re: [c-nsp] Can ASR920 handle ip vrf forwarding X combined with tunnel vrf Y on a tunnel interface?

2019-08-20 Thread Peter Olsson
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 07:54:13PM +, Nick Cutting wrote: > Is the tunnel source and destination IP addresses in vrf TEST, with routes? > - Like a F-VRF. The ASR920 has its BDI interface (10.50.3.2) in vrf TEST, the other router doesn't use vrf:s, but is connected to the same VLAN in the

Re: [c-nsp] Can ASR920 handle ip vrf forwarding X combined with tunnel vrf Y on a tunnel interface?

2019-08-20 Thread Nick Cutting
Is the tunnel source and destination IP addresses in vrf TEST, with routes? - Like a F-VRF. If this operates like an ASR/ISR4k - Then you can put the tunnel IP in whatever table you choose. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Peter Olsson Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2019

[c-nsp] Can ASR920 handle ip vrf forwarding X combined with tunnel vrf Y on a tunnel interface?

2019-08-20 Thread Peter Olsson
Hello! I have this configuration on a tunnel interface in an ASR920: interface Tunnel0 ip address 192.168.154.2 255.255.255.0 keepalive 10 3 tunnel source 10.50.3.2 tunnel destination 10.50.3.1 Works fine, the tunnel between the ASR920 and the other router is connected. Then I add both vrf