Re: [c-nsp] 6509 w/SUP720-3BXL and high CPU load

2020-03-19 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 10:28:58AM -0700, Lee Starnes wrote: > We are seeing on one of our 6509 chassis high CPU load (50-90%). We are not As ytti said, you're software switching. Are you carrying full tables, and have hit MLS CEF limits? ("show mls cef exception status") If this is

Re: [c-nsp] 6509 w/SUP720-3BXL and high CPU load

2020-03-19 Thread Nathan Lannine
> > > First thing I'd try is to capture punted packets. > > Per the document the you linked, I've found netdr or cpu span to be helpful in this regard. That community post pretty much mirrors an official doc on the same topic. I think the last time I saw something like this it was some kind of

Re: [c-nsp] 6509 w/SUP720-3BXL and high CPU load

2020-03-19 Thread Saku Ytti
On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 at 19:33, Lee Starnes wrote: > CPU on 6509b: CPU utilization for five seconds: 62%/22%; one minute: 42%; > five minutes: 42% The 2nd number is I/O, so you're software switching something. What and why may be complex to answer and my 7600 memories seem to be ethanol soluble.

[c-nsp] 6509 w/SUP720-3BXL and high CPU load

2020-03-19 Thread Lee Starnes
Hello, We are seeing on one of our 6509 chassis high CPU load (50-90%). We are not seeing this on our other chassis and they are all optioned the same. The one difference is that this chassis is sending traffic on one incoming 10gig interface out to another 6509 where that traffic is destine to

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 920 Strange SFP behavior

2020-03-19 Thread Shawn L
That's interesting. After reading David's reply, I rebooted one of the 920s that has been having issues and went to bed (no important traffic on it yet). This morning -- the interfaces it couldn't identify yesterday (or several days before that) are now all correctly identified. I'll have to go