Re: [c-nsp] Question about 9410R interface naming

Nexus has it right - everything is "E" From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of aar...@gvtc.com Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2020 5:58 PM To: 'Nick Hilliard' Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Question about 9410R interface naming This message originates from outside of your

Re: [c-nsp] Question about 9410R interface naming

Juniper was good with port id's until the MX204:) Now XE doesn't always mean 10 gig set interfaces xe-0/1/4 gigether-options speed 1g agould@dallas-204-1> show interfaces xe-0/1/4 | grep speed Link-level type: Flexible-Ethernet, MTU: 9216, MRU: 9224, LAN-PHY mode, Speed: 10Gbps, BPDU

Re: [c-nsp] [External] Re: Question about 9410R interface naming

Yeah every time I evaluate a platform I now ask about this because on some Dell switches I manage when you change the interface from 10G to 25G it actually renames the interfaces and resets the configuration of the interface. I understand that the ports are just broken out 100G ports but at the

Re: [c-nsp] Question about 9410R interface naming

On 9/10/20 10:24, Doug McIntyre wrote: The NBASE-T speeds are popular in WiFi AP as the speeds one could get under ideal circumstances started pushing over 1G limits. The inclusion of POE with NBASE-T also helps on the AP use case. ___ cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] [External] Re: Question about 9410R interface naming

I suspect the reason for the weird abbreviation for "TwentyFive" and "TwoHundred" is because, on Cat9300, 2.5G is "TwoGigabitEthernet" - Tw But hell, I just discovered on Cat9300 you can use Tw for both?!??!?!?! MOR121c9300#show run int tw 1/0/1 | incl interface interface TwoGigabitEthernet1/0/1

Re: [c-nsp] Question about 9410R interface naming

aar...@gvtc.com wrote on 10/09/2020 17:16: 000.1 - Fa 050 - Fi 040 - Fo 400 - F 001 - Gi 100 - Hu 010 - Te 025 - TF 200 - TH if there were a fundamental difference between these interface types, the naming differentiation might be useful, but it's all ethernet. Fortunately, other vendors

Re: [c-nsp] Question about 9410R interface naming

On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 09:27:34AM -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote: > On 9/10/20 09:16, aar...@gvtc.com wrote: > > Interesting... I've never heard of/seen 2.5 gig nor 5 g, geez, what is that? > > 802.3bz > > Options for speeds beyond 1Gbps but maybe you can't (cheaply easily > quickly) rip and

Re: [c-nsp] Question about 9410R interface naming

On 9/10/20 09:16, aar...@gvtc.com wrote: Interesting... I've never heard of/seen 2.5 gig nor 5 g, geez, what is that? 802.3bz Options for speeds beyond 1Gbps but maybe you can't (cheaply easily quickly) rip and replace all your building/house cabling to make the leap to 10GbE. You can do

Re: [c-nsp] Question about 9410R interface naming

Interesting... I've never heard of/seen 2.5 gig nor 5 g, geez, what is that? Off topic slightly, I have seen these recently(xr7) RP/0/RP0/CPU0:ios#sh int ? ... FastEthernet FastEthernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) | short name is Fa FiftyGigEFiftyGigabitEthernet/IEEE 802.3

Re: [c-nsp] Question about 9410R interface naming

Good Morning Drew, They are TenGigabitethernet Interfaces: PortNameStatus VlanDuplex Speed Type Te10/0/44 connected xxx a-full a-1000 100/1000/2.5G/5G/10GBaseTX Have a good day, Aaron Aaron Childs   Director Infrastructure Services 

[c-nsp] Question about 9410R interface naming

Hi, I have a quirky question about the 9410's Interface naming/numbering. These switches appear to support 1G 2.5G, 5G and 10G interfaces. Do the names of the interfaces change depending on the speed? Is it ethernet1/1/1 no matter what? Or does it change to GigabitEthernet1/1/1 or

[c-nsp] Core - distrubution

On 09/09/2020 21:16, Aaron wrote: > use ipv6 fc00::/7? https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4193 ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

[c-nsp] Core - distrubution

On 10/09/2020 08:14, aar...@gvtc.com wrote: > All my eyeball ip addresses and internet connections are overlayed in mpls > l3vpn vrf $old_dayjob used public space for the underlay IGP network. Everything else was run as l2/3vpn vrf or l2 p2p overlays. Had the benefit of capable customer

[c-nsp] Strange ASR920 problems with pppoe enabled

Hi All I have a problem that I cannot understand on a cisco ASR920. I have an interface that will do xconnect: interface GigabitEthernet0/0/8 mtu 1600 no ip address media-type sfp negotiation auto service instance 2079 ethernet encapsulation dot1q 2079 rewrite ingress tag pop 1

Re: [c-nsp] Core - distrubution

My whole core and distribution network is all 10.x.x.x (rfc1918). All my eyeball ip addresses and internet connections are overlayed in mpls l3vpn vrf -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net