On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 at 09:38, Mark Tinka wrote:
> We are currently running 6.7.1, mainly to fix some LDPv6 issues.
>
> However, we started seeing this "too many BGP refresh messages" issue as
> far back as 6.4.2.
Did you run RPKI? Did you have softinbound disabled?
This would cause a refresh
On 11/11/21 09:18, Gert Doering wrote:
"newer code" might be the key issue here - what version are you on?
Our 9001 have been extremely well-behaved in regards to BGP performance
and robustness. Not as fast as the RSP440, but still well up to the
job.
We're on 6.5.3 ("nothing interesting
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 08:27:44AM +0200, Mark Tinka wrote:
> We have nothing against the forwarding performance of the ASR9001. It's
> the control/management plane that seems to be slowing down (at least for
> us, anyway) with newer code and a growing Internet DFZ.
"newer code" might be
On 11/10/21 20:47, Shawn L wrote:
I'll second Tom on this one. I actually have 2 9001S routers (the S is the
port / memory limited license). They have 2 full feeds (V4 and V6) and
some EIGRP, and that's about it. Currently handling things fine. Though
only doing ~ 5gig in/out at this
On 11/10/21 20:00, Tom Hill wrote:
I may live to regret asking this, but...
I've run a lot more than that on a 9001, and it handled it all with
aplomb. They're not as fast as an RSP440 (or RSP880) but in no way did I
find them to be liabilities when running alongside measurably faster
I'll second Tom on this one. I actually have 2 9001S routers (the S is the
port / memory limited license). They have 2 full feeds (V4 and V6) and
some EIGRP, and that's about it. Currently handling things fine. Though
only doing ~ 5gig in/out at this point.
Shawn
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 1:04
On 05/11/2021 07:53, Mark Tinka wrote:
> We are retiring ours, because CPU performance for just 2x IPv4 + 2x IPv6
> full sessions is too much for the Freescale PPC CPU.
I may live to regret asking this, but...
I've run a lot more than that on a 9001, and it handled it all with
aplomb. They're
