Re: [c-nsp] ASR9000 QoS counters on LAG

2024-01-20 Thread Saku Ytti via cisco-nsp
On Jun, 21 Jan 2024 at 03:17, Ross Halliday wrote: > Moving to qos-group for egress classes got me the result I was looking for. > Thank you very much! I'm happy that you got the results you wanted, but that shouldn't have fixed it. The 'priority level 3' is the only thing that I can think of

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9000 QoS counters on LAG

2024-01-20 Thread Ross Halliday via cisco-nsp
Moving to qos-group for egress classes got me the result I was looking for. Thank you very much! Cheers Ross -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Ross Halliday via cisco-nsp Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2024 4:44 PM To: Saku Ytti Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re:

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9000 QoS counters on LAG

2024-01-20 Thread Ross Halliday via cisco-nsp
Hi Saku, > Any syslog messages when you attach it? Nope, though I'm quite ignorant as to whether I have the appropriate logging options turned on. > I don't think the device supports 'priority level 3', there is only > default, 2 and 1 . Default being the worst and 1 the best (well in > CLI,

[c-nsp] IOS-XR unsuppressed map BGP

2024-01-20 Thread Toje TJ via cisco-nsp
Good day,. Apologize if I ask the wrong question or anything, I just wondering how to configure an unsuppressed map in iox-xr for BGP aggregate with summary-only, hence I tried to google but was unable to find any good sample. I am doing this for my lab, thank you so much for answering this