no LSP-VIF interface , thus the rpf check will
fail. I never got it to work as advertised and ended up using mldp.
Hope this helps.
Catalin Petrescu
From: Cydon Satyr cydonsa...@gmail.com
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] ASR9000 Multicast over P2MP TE
again to look into second one.
The paper doesn't say what version they are running on asr as per cisco
documentation only static configuration is available thus only S-PMSI is
advertised at least in 4.3.2.
Regards,
Catalin Petrescu
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Mark Tinka mark.ti
TEST in grt (
defaul-vrf) .
Thx,
Catalin Petrescu
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
hi Oliver,
In this case it's a iBGP route but i've tested with connected static and
ospf and it's the same.
vrf RO_CASA
address-family ipv4 unicast
import route-target
1:1
!
export to default-vrf route-policy default_policy_pass_all
export route-target
1:1
!
RP/0/RSP1/CPU0:#sh
Thx Oliver .
router bgp xx
address-family ipv4 unicast this was missing
vrf TEST
address-family ipv4 unicast
redistribute connected metric 10
redistribute static metric 10
as the leak route is know via bgp ( in default vrf) and not
connected/static ( as in vrf )
Regards,
Catalin
