I've seen that before when the RPF interface is one where PIM is not enabled.
Have you double checked to make sure that PIM is up, working, and has
neighbors on all of the interfaces (don't forget loopbacks)?
David Barak
Sent from a mobile device, please forgive autocorrection.
On Apr 15
Last I checked ISIS didn#39;t work over mgre interfaces and you#39;d need to
use OSPF. This might be code-dependent.
David Barak
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http
for a
small number of people to be preserved.
David Barak
Sent from a mobile device, please forgive autocorrection.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail
, but the reports
and maps are pretty readable.
David Barak
Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise:
http://www.listentothefranchise.com
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http
don't need to have many areas.
David Barak
Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise:
http://www.listentothefranchise.com
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net
the functionality of this.
Certificates are orthogonal to the KS functionality of GDOI (GetVPN), but you
need
the KS to be on-line, while generally you'll want an off-line CA, so
you're probably better keeping those separate. I've had great success
with GDOI.
David Barak
Need Geek Rock
BFD is great stuff. Is there any chance of getting BFD on the 45k platform?
David Barak
(apologies for the mobile-device-style top post)
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive
Hi all,
I know that the 4500 Sup 6E doesn't support BFD right now. Does anyone know
whether this is a roadmapped feature, or is that never going to be supported?
David Barak
Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise: http://www.listentothefranchise.com
to
figure out some good boundaries.
David Barak
Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise:
http://www.listentothefranchise.com
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http
hierarchy, then the backbone itself are the L1/L2
routers (but each one is in a different area). If you have a three-layer
hierarchy, then L1/L2 belongs in the middle.
Hope that helps,
David Barak
Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise:
http://www.listentothefranchise.com
defaults.
David Barak
Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise:
http://www.listentothefranchise.com
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
, but that can be expensive depending on the
platform.
David Barak
Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise:
http://www.listentothefranchise.com
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive
-family is not supported on many images.
David Barak
Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise:
http://www.listentothefranchise.com
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http
I use both and you can even use the former as an unnumbered interface source.
Both work fine.
David
(sorry about the top post; mobile device)
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
There is a document on cisco#39;s site regarding how IGMP snooping breaks
multicast in typical LAN environments. I don#39;t have the link handy, but it
should be googleable. Effectively, the issue is that the switches do not have
a way to properly identify the mrouter port, and end up cutting
that matches the
RP-address.
There's a lot more to optimization and troubleshooting, but that should provide
initial connectivity. Some good tutorials on the subject can be found at
http://nanog.org/resources/tutorials/
David Barak
Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise:
http
passwords doens't hurt either :)
Why not just use site-to-site BGP across the VPLS provider instead of OSPF? A
simple prepend will make sure that the AS_PATHs work out right, and then all of
the ickiness which is redistribution can be avoided.
David Barak
Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise
it in (using
snmp-server chassis-id or the like). Other than that, the automated tools are
definitely the way to go.
David Barak
Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise:
http://www.listentothefranchise.com
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp
you're missing the command
card type t1 0 0
Until you do that, the router doesn't know whether it's a T1 or an E1.
David Barak
Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise:
http://www.listentothefranchise.com
- Original Message
From: james edwards lists.james.edwa...@gmail.com
To: cisco-nsp
will modify the
PPP behavior.
-David Barak
Roger Wiklund wrote:
Hi
I have a strange problem. I have a Serial interface with one /30 IP
configure as a link network between PE and CE.
interface Serial1/0
description MPLS Circuit
bandwidth 34368
ip address 206.115.103.122 255.255.255.252
ip
the servers in-situ or
to maintain a list of allocated virtual MAC addresses and watch for duplicates.
Good luck,
David Barak
Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise:
http://www.listentothefranchise.com
- Original Message
From: Bruno Filipe brun0_fil...@yahoo.com
To: cisco-nsp
of the non-Cisco
implementations of TACACS+.
-David Barak
Ziv Leyes wrote:
Hi all,
I'm in need to implement an AAA method other than local for our Cisco devices
(routers/switches)
I was thinking of using the already existing Active Directory, because all
people has an account
ODR perhaps? Or maybe OER (that#39;s one letter higher anyway...)
;)
-David
Hank Nussbacher wrote:
I just got this product alert from Cisco:
From: cisconotificationserv...@cisco.com
To: h...@efes.iucc.ac.il
Subject: Cisco Notification Alert -Alerts_Daily-07/28/2009 07:38 GMT
Cisco
deterministic.
Prepending toward cogent is a good idea to increase the likelihood of
deterministic behavior.
-David Barak
Nathan wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:56 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what would be the behavior if I set the community for Cogent to set
the Local Preference
I can confirm that this appears to be true of NPE-G2s as well.
David Barak
Daniel Roesen wrote:
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 07:15:19PM -0700, Irfan Siddiqui wrote:
I don't think this is possible on 720X you have to read it of of chassis
Indeed. We resorted to configure the chassis sticker ID
Have you taken a look at this Cisco notice:
http://www.cisco.com/application/pdf/paws/68131/cat_multicast_prob.pdf and
mitigated the IGMP snooping problem?
David Barak
Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise:
http://www.listentothefranchise.com
--- On Tue, 8/12/08, 田云生 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
I don#39;t have the link in front of me, but I remember a document describing
the 3825 as working well for a partial DS3, and the 3845 as working for a full
DS3.
Also, the ESW modules have some definite quirks, so check to make sure that all
of your features work before deploying them.
-David
is next in the algorithm,
and it should do what you want.
David Barak
Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise:
http://www.listentothefranchise.com
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
of the interfaces can have their Marsupial Transmission
Unit value changed and some cannot.
David Barak
Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise:
http://www.listentothefranchise.com
You rock. That's why
.
I haven#39;t looked lately, so hopefully that behavior has changed.
-David Barak
Justin Shore wrote:
hostname host
ip domain-name domain.tld
crypto key generate rsa modulus 2048
!
ip ssh time-out 60
ip ssh version 2
ip ssh authentication-retries 3
!
service nagle
no service pad
Hi,
I believe the initial poster was talking about normal loopbacks- ther kind
you#39;d use for network management, ibgp peering, or perhaps anycast. In
that case, you needn#39;t be worried about spf churn, because they#39;re
yours, and not going down, and you would want the routes generated
Hi,
I believe the initial poster was talking about normal loopbacks- ther kind
you#39;d use for network management, ibgp peering, or perhaps anycast. In
that case, you needn#39;t be worried about spf churn, because they#39;re
yours, and not going down, and you would want the routes generated
of your
remote sites to prefer a single path, go with dual-hub.
David Barak
Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise:
http://www.listentothefranchise.com
--- On Wed, 1/16/08, Luan Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Luan Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [c-nsp] DMVPN single cloud with resiliency
domain, and you'll get into number of
routers in a single area limits. Make sure that the
crypto you're using is hardware-based.
I've personally used it up to about 60 sites.
-David Barak
David Barak
Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise:
http://www.listentothefranchise.com
cases where it's a good
idea, but I agree: in general it'd be better to use
connected rather than static routing for a LAN.
-David Barak
David Barak
Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise:
http://www.listentothefranchise.com
35 matches
Mail list logo