There was an issue a while back that Cisco had with faulty memory from a
particular vendor.
I'm not sure the exact symptoms, but it might be worth reading through this
doc:http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/field-notices/634/fn63405.html
Cheers,Josh
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 06:50:43 +0200
Hi,
Is anyone else having issues with http://cs.co on IPv6? I've been having issues
with it over the last little while. It seems to be working on v4, but the
record still exists so it's causing some grief.
Cheers,Josh
, Joshua Riesenweber wrote:
Is anyone else having issues with http://cs.co on IPv6? I've been
having issues with it over the last little while. It seems to be
working on v4, but the record still exists so it's causing some
grief.
Yeah, failing to connect here. IPv6 gets into Rackspace's
Hi all,
I'm looking for a bit of advice on a system/process that will allow an end user
to restore a switch config.
I have a customer with a 24/7 site running a number of Catalyst switches. Due
to the nature of the operation, we have a 'warm' spare switch ready to replace
any failures.
learn there's a knob to turn
that implicit deny into an implicit allow-to-less-secure which will
make me regret all those hours spent tuning DMZ inbound access-lists.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 8:57 AM, David White, Jr. (dwhitejr)
dwhit...@cisco.com wrote:
On 2/11/2015 7:29 AM, Joshua
This has a few good
examples:http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/asa82/configuration/guide/config/acl_extended.html
I might very well be wrong, but I believe the security levels are negated if an
access list is applied to an interface.
Cheers,Josh
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 20:43:37
for example.
This obviously only works per entire subnet rather than individual IP¹s
but it still allows you to utilise both links un-equally (if that¹s a
word? :).
SteveH
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Riesenweber joshua.riesenwe...@outlook.com
Reply-To: joshua.riesenwe
Hi all,
I'm looking for a bit of insight from someone with more BGP experience than me.
(I've tried searching around the 'net trying to find an elegant solution.)
I have the common enterprise configuration of 2x WAN links multi-homed with 2x
ISPs. I have a single /24 public IP allocation being
Hi Chris,
I have a number of the EHWIC-4G-LTE-G models running, mostly as redundant
connections.
I found them to be extremely reliable in terms of no lockups and reconnecting
without issue, but after running for a while they seem to slow. For example,
after a few days of running the speed
Georgia Tech had an online course a little while back on SDN that was pretty
good.Goes through a fair bit on mininet, openflow, etc. including setup.
The course is over but you can probably get the archive:
https://class.coursera.org/sdn-002
Cheers,Josh
From: xuhu...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 6
Do you have control of the devices at each L2 hop? Can you run packet captures
and see where the hello is dropped?
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:08:45 +0600
From: v...@mpeks.tomsk.su
To: friedr...@pdv-sachsen.net
CC: vlaso...@sibptus.tomsk.ru; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp]
...@outlook.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cursed IP address
Joshua Riesenweber wrote:
Out of curiosity, is this the highest IP address on the router?
On some routers there is no loopback interface, so yes, on some
routers 10.65.127.246 may become the router ID
12 matches
Mail list logo