Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Router 2821 is having issue getting error

2015-04-23 Thread Joshua Riesenweber
There was an issue a while back that Cisco had with faulty memory from a particular vendor. I'm not sure the exact symptoms, but it might be worth reading through this doc:http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/field-notices/634/fn63405.html Cheers,Josh Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 06:50:43 +0200

[c-nsp] cs.co on IPv6

2015-04-07 Thread Joshua Riesenweber
Hi, Is anyone else having issues with http://cs.co on IPv6? I've been having issues with it over the last little while. It seems to be working on v4, but the record still exists so it's causing some grief. Cheers,Josh

Re: [c-nsp] cs.co on IPv6

2015-04-07 Thread Joshua Riesenweber
, Joshua Riesenweber wrote: Is anyone else having issues with http://cs.co on IPv6? I've been having issues with it over the last little while. It seems to be working on v4, but the record still exists so it's causing some grief. Yeah, failing to connect here. IPv6 gets into Rackspace's

[c-nsp] Restoring switch config to floating spare

2015-03-12 Thread Joshua Riesenweber
Hi all, I'm looking for a bit of advice on a system/process that will allow an end user to restore a switch config. I have a customer with a 24/7 site running a number of Catalyst switches. Due to the nature of the operation, we have a 'warm' spare switch ready to replace any failures.

Re: [c-nsp] ASA

2015-02-11 Thread Joshua Riesenweber
learn there's a knob to turn that implicit deny into an implicit allow-to-less-secure which will make me regret all those hours spent tuning DMZ inbound access-lists. On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 8:57 AM, David White, Jr. (dwhitejr) dwhit...@cisco.com wrote: On 2/11/2015 7:29 AM, Joshua

Re: [c-nsp] ASA

2015-02-11 Thread Joshua Riesenweber
This has a few good examples:http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/asa82/configuration/guide/config/acl_extended.html I might very well be wrong, but I believe the security levels are negated if an access list is applied to an interface. Cheers,Josh Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 20:43:37

Re: [c-nsp] Basic inbound BGP path preferencing query

2015-01-27 Thread Joshua Riesenweber
for example. This obviously only works per entire subnet rather than individual IP¹s but it still allows you to utilise both links un-equally (if that¹s a word? :). SteveH -Original Message- From: Joshua Riesenweber joshua.riesenwe...@outlook.com Reply-To: joshua.riesenwe

[c-nsp] Basic inbound BGP path preferencing query

2015-01-26 Thread Joshua Riesenweber
Hi all, I'm looking for a bit of insight from someone with more BGP experience than me. (I've tried searching around the 'net trying to find an elegant solution.) I have the common enterprise configuration of 2x WAN links multi-homed with 2x ISPs. I have a single /24 public IP allocation being

Re: [c-nsp] VZW 4G LTE Interface Card

2014-12-10 Thread Joshua Riesenweber
Hi Chris, I have a number of the EHWIC-4G-LTE-G models running, mostly as redundant connections. I found them to be extremely reliable in terms of no lockups and reconnecting without issue, but after running for a while they seem to slow. For example, after a few days of running the speed

Re: [c-nsp] SDN setup startup from lab first

2014-12-06 Thread Joshua Riesenweber
Georgia Tech had an online course a little while back on SDN that was pretty good.Goes through a fair bit on mininet, openflow, etc. including setup. The course is over but you can probably get the archive: https://class.coursera.org/sdn-002 Cheers,Josh From: xuhu...@gmail.com Date: Sat, 6

Re: [c-nsp] Cursed IP address

2014-11-27 Thread Joshua Riesenweber
Do you have control of the devices at each L2 hop? Can you run packet captures and see where the hello is dropped? Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:08:45 +0600 From: v...@mpeks.tomsk.su To: friedr...@pdv-sachsen.net CC: vlaso...@sibptus.tomsk.ru; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp]

Re: [c-nsp] Cursed IP address

2014-11-26 Thread Joshua Riesenweber
...@outlook.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cursed IP address Joshua Riesenweber wrote: Out of curiosity, is this the highest IP address on the router? On some routers there is no loopback interface, so yes, on some routers 10.65.127.246 may become the router ID