As you found out, XR won't forward the traffic using inter-VRF route
leaking if it has to do another recursive lookup in the next VRF. It
requires specifying the next-hop/interface or leaking the more specific
routes into the VRF. So if you have 0/0 pointing to null0 that's not going
to work.
I agree, I mentioned earlier most just want a single image where they load the
image, reboot the box if that’s required, and that’s it. Managing application
level software patches isn’t something most want to keep track of or maintain.
Whle the flexibility is there to do that, it’s not
With XR7 the idea was to mimic how things are done with Linux repos by having a
specific RPM repo for the routers and the patches which is managed similar to
Linux and that’s how all software is packaged now. Dependencies are resolved
automatically, etc. RPMs are installed as atomic
Yes there are some various differences depending on what versions you are using.
You can, at least in later versions use install replace with http, at least
with GISO. You also do not need the apply command, and you can include
“commit” in the replace command so it’s not required after the
The newer software is packaged that way already, if you don’t need SMUs. If
you want to customize it with SMUs and whatnot it takes a few minutes, depends
on your processor and storage speed of course.
Thanks,
Phil
On 2/26/23, 11:18 AM, "Gert Doering" wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at
SMUs were a good idea, but not really great in practice. Most customers I work
with do not want to manage application level patches, just entire images, even
in cases where they are just a process restart.
XR for a number of years now has had the concept of a “golden ISO”. It’s a
single
Ok well there are a number those as well. The 55A2 and newer 57C3 also support
a number of 100G ports.
I quite don’t fully understand the “verbose architecture” comment. I’ve used a
lot of router operating systems, Junos since 1999, SROS, XR, XE, you name it,
and there isn’t a whole lot of
The original question was around an Internet border router with 10G support.
We have devices like the 55A2-MOD-SE which is similar to some other vendor
devices (somewhat of a reference Broadcom design) which we’ve seen be very
popular in border router deployments where you do not need a ton
As Tom mentioned,
There are a number of platforms.
There is the somewhat older J+ NCS nodes like the 55A1-36H which is 36x100GE
QSFP28.
There is the 8000 series which has a number of models that would fit like the
8201-32FH and newer 8201-24H8FH (24x100G, 8x400G).
There is also a new NCS
Others mentioned EVPN for ELAN/VPLS type services, but it’s not just for
multipoint services. EVPN-VPWS is how we see most who do not have an existing
Martini T-LDP deploying P2P L2VPN. P2P is going to be transparent to most of
what the customer or 3rd party provider is sending. If they
Hi,
Not much different than Junos. Everything in the XR config can be configured
using Netconf using either native models or OpenConfig. You can check out
https://github.com/YangModels/yang/tree/main/vendor/cisco/xr for supported
models by version. Any other questions just let me know.
11 matches
Mail list logo
