Re: [c-nsp] Subject: Re: Annex-M 877

Not entirely. Support for the Annex-M was new in 12.4(11)XJ but was subsequently integrated into 12.4(15)T, and therefore will almost certainly be in the upcoming 12.5 mainline. See http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6441/prod_release_note09186a00804a19ae.html#wp1981448 So 12.4(15)T1

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS Tag Control process - what does this do?

On 3/08/2007 10:33 PM, Rodney Dunn wrote: 'sh ip route summ'. 370flinders-r200.32-pe01#show ip route summary IP routing table name is Default-IP-Routing-Table(0) Route SourceNetworksSubnets OverheadMemory (bytes) connected 0 58 42288816 static

[c-nsp] MPLS design in a non-MPLS cored network - was Re: MPLS and VLAN on same FE or GE interface ?

Tim Franklin wrote: On Wed, July 4, 2007 10:24 am, Code Monkey wrote: Back in 2003 I failed miserably at configuring two 7206 VXR so that their FE interfaces could be connected to a VLAN switch, running MPLS in one VLAN and non-MPLS in other VLANs. I've done this in a previous life, using

Re: [c-nsp] BGP Peer Problem with 7200-G2

On 29/06/2007 12:12 AM, Skeeve Stevens wrote: Hi Guys, It's late here and either I am going mad or this router is on drugs. GS-7204G2-BORDER uptime is 3 weeks, 6 days, 12 hours, 15 minutes System returned to ROM by reload at 11:46:27 AEST Fri Jun 1 2007 System restarted at 11:48:07

Re: [c-nsp] ospf (interface down or detached error)

There is a good document at: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_tech_note09186a008009481a.shtml on troubleshooting this sort of thing and in fact OSPF problems generally. reuben On 27/06/2007 5:42 PM, Vincent De Keyzer wrote: Hi Scott, I'm not very good at this, but are

Re: [c-nsp] Access-list Question

Tony Li wrote: On May 15, 2007, at 11:23 PM, Scott Granados wrote: Well can't we don't care bit ourselves around to masking or something consistent? It is confusing at times although it's interesting to know that's the origin. If it were up to me (it's not ;-), the UI would be

<    1   2