Re: [c-nsp] OSPF's handling of secondary IP addresses on subinterfaces

. Will test to confirm tonight. On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Robert Johnson fasterfour...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, I'm actually seeing one subinterface with a secondary address have both the primary and secondary address subnets advertised into OSPF and another have only the primary advertised. Very

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF's handling of secondary IP addresses on subinterfaces

or a bug? On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Wayne Lee linkconn...@googlemail.com wrote: Sent from my iPad On 7 Apr 2012, at 03:29, Robert Johnson fasterfour...@gmail.com wrote: I have a FastEthernet interface with multiple 802.1Q based subinterfaces. OSPF properly advertises routes

[c-nsp] OSPF's handling of secondary IP addresses on subinterfaces

I have a FastEthernet interface with multiple 802.1Q based subinterfaces. OSPF properly advertises routes for the subnets directly defined on these subinterfaces. However if I add secondary IP addresses to these subinterfaces, the subnets defined using the secondary command show up in the local

[c-nsp] Parallel VTIs

I have a 2811 and a 3745 router at separate sites. I'd like to establish two IPSEC virtual tunnel interface links between the routers, in parallel. One tunnel will be used for production traffic, the other for a management network. Is there an accepted way of making this work? Configuring a second

Re: [c-nsp] Parallel VTIs

different addresses? What is the rationale for using two tunnels between a pair of routers, given the destinations appear to land in the same routing instance? Cheers, Matt -Original Message- Message: 3 Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 10:50:16 -0400 From: Robert Johnson fasterfour...@gmail.com

[c-nsp] 3745 router crash

I have a 3745 router with 256D, a NM-1FE-FX in slot 0, and a NM-2FE2W in slot 1. IOS 12.4(25a). On Wednesday the router locked hard and was unresponsive from console, etc. Power cycle brought it back up. This morning the router crashed, but this time came up on its own. I'm not finding much

Re: [c-nsp] 3745 router crash

and fixes. 3. If the problem persists, consider opening a service request with Cisco at   TAC Service Request Tool. On 30.03.2012 19:12, Robert Johnson wrote: I have a 3745 router with 256D, a NM-1FE-FX in slot 0, and a NM-2FE2W in slot 1. IOS 12.4(25a). On Wednesday the router locked hard

Re: [c-nsp] IRB and 802.1q subinterfaces - How to set COS?

to put the policy-map on the main interface. This was on a GSR and a particular linecard - but may be worth a try. It could just be it won't work properly with the way your doing bridging. 3) Have you done any debugs? On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Robert Johnson fasterfour...@gmail.com wrote

[c-nsp] IRB and 802.1q subinterfaces - How to set COS?

IOS 12.4 advanced enterprise on a 3745. I have two fast ethernet interfaces, each with a set of 802.1q subinterfaces. Each subinterface has a bridge-group assigned to it so that select VLANS on each FE port are bridged. I'd like to apply a policy-map to one of the outbound subinterfaces that looks

[c-nsp] 3745 router NM slots

Hello list, I have several 3745 routers. I have the NM slot 2 (bottom left) populated in a few of them. It seems that this particular slot is very touchy when it comes to making a good connection between the NM and the backplane connector. Unless they're seated just right, I see everything from a

[c-nsp] Router on a stick with multiple bridged interfaces

Hello Cisco experts, Here's today's question. I have a simple router on a stick with a fastethernet interface and multiple 802.1Q subinterfaces connected to a layer 2 switchport in trunk mode. Now say I want to add another switch with the same group of VLANs as the first switch, bridged to the

Re: [c-nsp] Multiple power supply failures. Advise needed

Coming from an electrical engineer: Before doing anything else, you need to get someone out there with a recording oscilloscope to verify the input power to your equipment. This is the best way to ensure that you are getting the proper waveform, and that your power is free from transients and

[c-nsp] Handling junk traffic with a secondary ISP using NAT

Hello Cisco experts, I have an interesting configuration here. I have an organization with some /24s of IP space assigned to their internal hosts. The IGP is OSPF and connectivity to the outside world is via a single ISP with multiple links using BGP (private ASN). In an effort to cut costs, we

Re: [c-nsp] Handling junk traffic with a secondary ISP using NAT

...@puck.nether.net [mailto: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Robert Johnson Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 5:05 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Handling junk traffic with a secondary ISP using NAT Hello Cisco experts, I have an interesting configuration here. I

[c-nsp] High CPU usage on 3640

Hello list, I would appreciate any help with going through the following configuration and making suggestions to reduce CPU usage on this router. The example router is a 3640 with a single FE interface run to a 2924 switch. It is loaded at peak times with less than 2000 PPS and 9 Mbps aggregate on

Re: [c-nsp] High CPU usage on 3640

Input On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.sewrote: On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Robert Johnson wrote: Suggestions? Please provide output from show int switching (not tab-completable) to verify that all traffic is cef switched. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm

[c-nsp] OSPF and iBGP session drops between 3640s

Hello list, I have a small network with four 3640s. Each router has 128/32MB ram, and a single FE interface connected to a catalyst 2924. Two of the routers are running BGP, each with a session to a (single) other provider, and a session between themselves. These are not carrying full tables. All