Re: [c-nsp] ASR9000 QoS counters on LAG

2024-01-20 Thread Ross Halliday via cisco-nsp
Moving to qos-group for egress classes got me the result I was looking for. Thank you very much! Cheers Ross -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Ross Halliday via cisco-nsp Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2024 4:44 PM To: Saku Ytti Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9000 QoS counters on LAG

2024-01-20 Thread Ross Halliday via cisco-nsp
Hi Saku, > Any syslog messages when you attach it? Nope, though I'm quite ignorant as to whether I have the appropriate logging options turned on. > I don't think the device supports 'priority level 3', there is only > default, 2 and 1 . Default being the worst and 1 the best (well in > CLI,

[c-nsp] ASR9000 QoS counters on LAG

2024-01-18 Thread Ross Halliday via cisco-nsp
Hello, We've inherited some older ASR9000 systems that we're trying to support in-place. The software version on this one router is fairly old at 6.1.4. Driving it are a pair of RSP440-SE. The line cards are A9K-MOD160-SE with A9K-MPA-8X10GE in each. I haven't had any issues until trying to

[c-nsp] BNG Geo-Redundancy

2022-10-09 Thread Ross Halliday via cisco-nsp
Hello, I'm trying to set up redundancy between a pair of ASR9ks for IPoE (DHCP) subscribers and am having a hard time wrapping my head around how one step is supposed to work. In "BNG Geo-Redundancy for L2-connected IPoE Subscriber Sessions"[1] there's the following logical flow under Control