Re: [c-nsp] "next-table" Equivalent for IOS XR - Default Route into Global Routing Table

2023-09-02 Thread Mark Tinka via cisco-nsp
On 9/3/23 02:05, Phil Bedard wrote:   Some Junos platforms won't do this either BTW, it's somewhat dependent on the forwarding hardware. I was wondering whether anyone running Junos on a current Broadcom chip has tested this. Trio spoils us. Mark. _

Re: [c-nsp] "next-table" Equivalent for IOS XR - Default Route into Global Routing Table

2023-09-02 Thread Phil Bedard via cisco-nsp
As you found out, XR won't forward the traffic using inter-VRF route leaking if it has to do another recursive lookup in the next VRF. It requires specifying the next-hop/interface or leaking the more specific routes into the VRF. So if you have 0/0 pointing to null0 that's not going to work. If

Re: [c-nsp] "next-table" Equivalent for IOS XR - Default Route into Global Routing Table

2023-08-29 Thread Mark Tinka via cisco-nsp
On 8/29/23 18:22, Daniël Verlouw wrote: slightly different approach, but I’ve had some success with ACL-based VRF select, but it really depends on your use-case: https://community.cisco.com/t5/service-providers-knowledge-base/asr9000-xr-abf-acl-based-forwarding/ta-p/3153403 Something like:

Re: [c-nsp] "next-table" Equivalent for IOS XR - Default Route into Global Routing Table

2023-08-29 Thread Mark Tinka via cisco-nsp
On 8/29/23 15:17, Gert Doering wrote: So, yes, I would be interested what exactly happens inside the box, and why it does not work / how hard it would be with existing ASR9k NPUs to make it work (technically) but I expect there will be no answer on this. I didn't even bother asking our SE.

Re: [c-nsp] "next-table" Equivalent for IOS XR - Default Route into Global Routing Table

2023-08-29 Thread Gert Doering via cisco-nsp
Hi, On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 02:28:53PM +0200, Mark Tinka via cisco-nsp wrote: > So yes, our default routes point to Null0. I changed that to something > useful and it still didn't work. It's almost as if the traffic exiting the > VRF toward the global table wanted to follow a label switched path,

Re: [c-nsp] "next-table" Equivalent for IOS XR - Default Route into Global Routing Table

2023-08-29 Thread Mark Tinka via cisco-nsp
On 8/29/23 11:40, Nathan Ward wrote: We were learning a default from an eBGP peer on the same node, so we were able to leak that in to the other VRF and get more or less what we wanted - but it wasn’t ideal. I tested the same by pointing 0/0 to another PE via the default VRF, and that work

Re: [c-nsp] "next-table" Equivalent for IOS XR - Default Route into Global Routing Table

2023-08-29 Thread Mark Tinka via cisco-nsp
On 8/29/23 12:43, Arie Vayner wrote: Would something like this work? https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/s/question/0D53i0KstGrCAJ/ios-xr-leaking-the-routes-between-vrf-and-global-rib That very thread was the last thing I tried this morning. It didn't work either. I suspected that it c

Re: [c-nsp] "next-table" Equivalent for IOS XR - Default Route into Global Routing Table

2023-08-29 Thread Arie Vayner via cisco-nsp
Would something like this work? https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/s/question/0D53i0KstGrCAJ/ios-xr-leaking-the-routes-between-vrf-and-global-rib On Tue, Aug 29, 2023, 7:49 AM Mark Tinka via cisco-nsp < cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote: > Hi all. > > I've been racking my brain trying to imple

Re: [c-nsp] "next-table" Equivalent for IOS XR - Default Route into Global Routing Table

2023-08-29 Thread Nathan Ward via cisco-nsp
On 29/08/2023 at 6:48:32 PM, Mark Tinka via cisco-nsp < cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote: > Hi all. > > I've been racking my brain trying to implement an equivalent feature in > IOS XR 6.7.1 similar to Junos' "next-table" feature. > > Essentially, I am trying to point all unknown destinations from

Re: [c-nsp] "next-table" Equivalent for IOS XR - Default Route into Global Routing Table

2023-08-29 Thread Mark Tinka via cisco-nsp
On 8/29/23 11:05, Fraser McGlinn wrote: Would this be a case where vasi-left and vasi-right interfaces are appropriate? Essentially same as an LT in Junos. Not as elegant for sure, but should function. IIRC, VASI support was only on the MSB (Multi Service Blade) on the XR 12000 platform.

Re: [c-nsp] "next-table" Equivalent for IOS XR - Default Route into Global Routing Table

2023-08-29 Thread Fraser McGlinn via cisco-nsp
Would this be a case where vasi-left and vasi-right interfaces are appropriate? Essentially same as an LT in Junos. Not as elegant for sure, but should function. Cheers, Fraser > On 29 Aug 2023, at 4:48 pm, Mark Tinka via cisco-nsp > wrote: > > Hi all. > > I've been racking my brain trying t

[c-nsp] "next-table" Equivalent for IOS XR - Default Route into Global Routing Table

2023-08-28 Thread Mark Tinka via cisco-nsp
Hi all. I've been racking my brain trying to implement an equivalent feature in IOS XR 6.7.1 similar to Junos' "next-table" feature. Essentially, I am trying to point all unknown destinations from within a VRF toward the local global table for resolution. In Junos, it's as easy as:   static