subject:"\[c\-nsp\] \*\*\* GMX Spamverdacht \*\*\* Replacing 3750X stack"

Re: [c-nsp] * GMX Spamverdacht * Replacing 3750X stack

2014-05-02 Thread Gert Doering

Hi, On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 06:43:32AM +0200, Garry wrote: We have a 3750X stack (2 switches) doing pure L2 at a small POP (Acting as a core switch) - The small buffers are causing a lot of performance issues, so we are looking to upgrade them. Not sure about your feature requirements,

Re: [c-nsp] * GMX Spamverdacht * Replacing 3750X stack

2014-05-02 Thread Gustav UHLANDER

Subject: Re: [c-nsp] *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Replacing 3750X stack Hi, On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 06:43:32AM +0200, Garry wrote: We have a 3750X stack (2 switches) doing pure L2 at a small POP (Acting as a core switch) - The small buffers are causing a lot of performance issues, so we

Re: [c-nsp] * GMX Spamverdacht * Replacing 3750X stack

2014-05-01 Thread Garry

On 02.05.2014 02:20, CiscoNSP List wrote: Hi, We have a 3750X stack (2 switches) doing pure L2 at a small POP (Acting as a core switch) - The small buffers are causing a lot of performance issues, so we are looking to upgrade them. Not sure about your feature requirements, but have you