Re: [c-nsp] [j-nsp] SRTBH

2022-07-13 Thread harbor235
thanks for the input Mike On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 10:20 AM Jeff Haas wrote: > In circumstances where the routing table can help you mitigate an attack, > including things that use uRPF, it'll usually scale significantly better > that flowspec. This is primarily because flowspec is just a

Re: [c-nsp] [j-nsp] SRTBH

2022-07-07 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 08:41:56AM -0400, harbor235 via juniper-nsp wrote: > Since Flowspec arrived, are there any uses for SRTBH? Scaling? My understanding of flowspec is that it is typically implemented by programming ACL TCAM, while SRTBH is routing table lookup, so "some 10.000 lines"