Re: [c-nsp] ASR 99xx IOS-XR images are all EoL/EoS?

2018-12-26 Thread Tom Hill
On 21/12/2018 10:43, James Bensley wrote: > Did you mean RSP880-LT? RL is the rate limited version down to 440Gbps > which is license to 880Gbps. Ah, I suspect I mean both. RL came out first, from memory; I bought a few for $job-1, given that their list cost was identical to an RSP440 and we

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 99xx IOS-XR images are all EoL/EoS?

2018-12-21 Thread James Bensley
On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 at 20:01, Charles Spurgeon wrote: > > Does anyone have info on what is going on? What are people running on > > their ASR 99xx platforms? 64 bit IOS-XR. On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 at 20:21, Tom Hill wrote: > > > It matters deeply which 99xx, and what supervisor(s) you have in it.

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 99xx IOS-XR images are all EoL/EoS?

2018-12-21 Thread Mark Tinka
On 21/Dec/18 11:09, Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN wrote: > Almost 1 year ago, at Cisco Live Barcelona, I've been told that the closest > thing to an ASR920 successor in 10G mode would be NCS540, which does have 2 x > 100G ports (and runs on 64-bit XR) Yes, I got the same from Cisco at the end of

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 99xx IOS-XR images are all EoL/EoS?

2018-12-21 Thread Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018, at 10:03, Mark Tinka wrote: > While this new ASR920 should be fine for most use-cases, it's a bit odd > to support that many 10Gbps ports without a 100Gbps uplink. Almost 1 year ago, at Cisco Live Barcelona, I've been told that the closest thing to an ASR920 successor in

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 99xx IOS-XR images are all EoL/EoS?

2018-12-21 Thread Mark Tinka
On 21/Dec/18 08:27, James Jun wrote: > > I feel like first generation ASR920s running 3.16.04S is the most stable ever > for 920 platform. For now I'm afraid of touching the new 12x10G ASR920s that > just came out. We considered various options to support 10Gbps service ports in the metro.

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 99xx IOS-XR images are all EoL/EoS?

2018-12-20 Thread James Jun
Hi, > > Besides that we have been very happy with the 9906's and IOS-XR 64bit. Similar situation here. We ordered our first ASR9906 back in August 31, 2017 when it went FCS, received it in November where it was shipped to us with 6.3.1. We took a really long time to put this device into

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 99xx IOS-XR images are all EoL/EoS?

2018-12-20 Thread Erik Sundberg
: Charles Spurgeon Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR 99xx IOS-XR images are all EoL/EoS? we are running 6.4.2 in classic xr. no confidence with 64 bit at the moment. need to see testing results from cisco first On Thursday, December 20, 2018, Charles Spurgeon < c.spurg...@austi

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 99xx IOS-XR images are all EoL/EoS?

2018-12-20 Thread Aaron
we are running 6.4.2 in classic xr. no confidence with 64 bit at the moment. need to see testing results from cisco first On Thursday, December 20, 2018, Charles Spurgeon < c.spurg...@austin.utexas.edu> wrote: > * Tom Hill [2018-12-19 20:19:09 +]: > > > On 19/12/2018 19:59, Charles Spurgeon

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 99xx IOS-XR images are all EoL/EoS?

2018-12-20 Thread Charles Spurgeon
* Tom Hill [2018-12-19 20:19:09 +]: > On 19/12/2018 19:59, Charles Spurgeon wrote: > > Does anyone have info on what is going on? What are people running on > > their ASR 99xx platforms? > > It matters deeply which 99xx, and what supervisor(s) you have in it. > > 9904 uses the same RSPs

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 99xx IOS-XR images are all EoL/EoS?

2018-12-19 Thread Ted Pelas Johansson
> When I saw a version 6 XR image for an ASR9001 I was shocked. > I had been told quite a while ago that 5.3.4 was it and no to expect anything > newer. 5.3.4 was the last release that supported Trident line cards [1], but since ASR 9001 is based on Typhoon [2] it should be supported until 2020

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 99xx IOS-XR images are all EoL/EoS?

2018-12-19 Thread Tom Hill
On 19/12/2018 20:29, Tim Warnock wrote: > When I saw a version 6 XR image for an ASR9001 I was shocked. > > I had been told quite a while ago that 5.3.4 was it and no to expect anything > newer. It was my counter on sun-setting 32-bit XR that the 9001 was the device that would warrant keeping

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 99xx IOS-XR images are all EoL/EoS?

2018-12-19 Thread Tim Warnock
> Mr. Ytti successfully predicted that they'd "probably" only make 32-bit > up to around version 6.5, so that sounds like it's right on the money. When I saw a version 6 XR image for an ASR9001 I was shocked. I had been told quite a while ago that 5.3.4 was it and no to expect anything newer.

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 99xx IOS-XR images are all EoL/EoS?

2018-12-19 Thread Tom Hill
On 19/12/2018 19:59, Charles Spurgeon wrote: > Does anyone have info on what is going on? What are people running on > their ASR 99xx platforms? It matters deeply which 99xx, and what supervisor(s) you have in it. 9904 uses the same RSPs as 9006/9010. 9906 and 9910 use a different RSP, with

[c-nsp] ASR 99xx IOS-XR images are all EoL/EoS?

2018-12-19 Thread Charles Spurgeon
The most recent starred (recommended) images on Cisco CCO for the ASR 9904 running 32-bit IOS-XR are 6.3.3 and 6.4.2. However, both releases were listed as EoL in Sept/Oct 2018 bulletins: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/ios-nx-os-software/ios-xr-software/eos-eol-notice-listing.html 6.3 is