On Jun, 21 Jan 2024 at 03:17, Ross Halliday
wrote:
> Moving to qos-group for egress classes got me the result I was looking for.
> Thank you very much!
I'm happy that you got the results you wanted, but that shouldn't have
fixed it. The 'priority level 3' is the only thing that I can think of
: [c-nsp] ASR9000 QoS counters on LAG
Hi Saku,
> Any syslog messages when you attach it?
Nope, though I'm quite ignorant as to whether I have the appropriate logging
options turned on.
> I don't think the device supports 'priority level 3', there is only
> default, 2 and 1 . Defa
Hi Saku,
> Any syslog messages when you attach it?
Nope, though I'm quite ignorant as to whether I have the appropriate logging
options turned on.
> I don't think the device supports 'priority level 3', there is only
> default, 2 and 1 . Default being the worst and 1 the best (well in
> CLI,
On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 at 05:10, Ross Halliday via cisco-nsp
wrote:
> We've inherited some older ASR9000 systems that we're trying to support
> in-place. The software version on this one router is fairly old at 6.1.4.
> Driving it are a pair of RSP440-SE. The line cards are A9K-MOD160-SE with
>
Hello,
We've inherited some older ASR9000 systems that we're trying to support
in-place. The software version on this one router is fairly old at 6.1.4.
Driving it are a pair of RSP440-SE. The line cards are A9K-MOD160-SE with
A9K-MPA-8X10GE in each.
I haven't had any issues until trying to
