Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

2016-02-03 Thread Gustav Ulander
-nsp] ASR920 "console" portugh Since is ASR920 bashing time ... anyone else noticed the red led ? Apparently red is the new green. -- Best regards, Adrian Minta ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.n

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

2016-02-03 Thread Cory Ayers
12:30 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" portugh Since is ASR920 bashing time ... anyone else noticed the red led ? Apparently red is the new green. -- Best regards, Adrian Minta ___ cisco-nsp ma

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

2016-02-02 Thread Adrian Minta
Since is ASR920 bashing time ... anyone else noticed the red led ? Apparently red is the new green. -- Best regards, Adrian Minta ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

2016-02-02 Thread Erik Sundberg
-nsp] ASR920 "console" portugh Since is ASR920 bashing time ... anyone else noticed the red led ? Apparently red is the new green. -- Best regards, Adrian Minta ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.n

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

2016-02-01 Thread Nathan Ward
> On 2/02/2016, at 17:32, Erik Sundberg wrote: > > Here are some pictures of the ASR920 Console kit A920-CONS-KIT-S > > > The Adapter Plugs in the Top Left USB Console Port and we have it wired up to > a Perle IOLAN SCS48C console server using a rollover cable. > >

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

2016-02-01 Thread Erik Sundberg
the cisco docs. http://imgur.com/a/w8clL -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Phil Mayers Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 5:15 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" portugh On 17/01/16 11:10,

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

2016-01-18 Thread Phil Mayers
On 17/01/16 11:10, Saku Ytti wrote: On 17 January 2016 at 04:04, Erik Sundberg wrote: Nah... The next model will be console via bluetooth. I would hope people include in their RFPs true OOB as requirement. I think only one in networking market doing that is Cisco in

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

2016-01-17 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 02:04:25AM +, Erik Sundberg wrote: > Nah... The next model will be console via bluetooth. Which would be nice, if it did not require a proprietary client app that only works on Windows 7, and only with a particular bluetooth chip that is out of production.

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

2016-01-17 Thread Saku Ytti
On 17 January 2016 at 04:04, Erik Sundberg wrote: > Nah... The next model will be console via bluetooth. I would hope people include in their RFPs true OOB as requirement. I think only one in networking market doing that is Cisco in their products with CMP. So Nexus7k

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

2016-01-16 Thread Nick Hilliard
Gert Doering wrote: > - for those with classic serial ports, or modem needs, there is a standard >serial console with *standard* layout (read: Cisco RJ45) i'm half expecting the ASR930 (if/when it ever happens) to come with the following: http://i.imgur.com/iCdq3Qt.jpg Nick

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

2016-01-16 Thread Nathan Ward
> On 16/01/2016, at 22:07, CiscoNSP List wrote: > > > Cheers for the replies guys - I'm really interested in the rational behind > moving to USB from traditional RJ45 portsrealestate?boggles the mind. Yeah I presume so. An RJ45 with two USB A holes

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

2016-01-16 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 12:11:59PM +, Nick Hilliard wrote: > Gert Doering wrote: > > - for those with classic serial ports, or modem needs, there is a standard > >serial console with *standard* layout (read: Cisco RJ45) > > i'm half expecting the ASR930 (if/when it ever happens) to

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

2016-01-16 Thread CiscoNSP List
m assuming they will be very inexpensive lol Cheers. From: Nathan Ward <cisco-...@daork.net> Sent: Saturday, 16 January 2016 6:50 PM To: CiscoNSP List Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" portugh > On 16/01/

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

2016-01-16 Thread Nathan Ward
> On 16/01/2016, at 23:51, Erik Sundberg wrote: > > My rack mount brackets don't look like that... Interesting! Post a pic? -- Nathan Ward ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

2016-01-16 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 09:07:00AM +, CiscoNSP List wrote: > Cheers for the replies guys - I'm really interested in the rational behind > moving to USB from traditional RJ45 portsrealestate?boggles the mind. Well, if done properly, it's actually easier to the admins than having

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

2016-01-16 Thread CiscoNSP List
ing Cc: CiscoNSP List; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" portugh On 16/01/2016, at 20:54, Gert Doering <g...@greenie.muc.de<mailto:g...@greenie.muc.de>> wrote: Hi, On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 08:50:49PM +1300, Nathan Ward wrote: Hi, there is both

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

2016-01-16 Thread Nathan Ward
> On 16/01/2016, at 22:03, CiscoNSP List wrote: > > Thanks Nathan - I really question Cisco's thought processwhat was "wrong" > with the traditional style RJ45 console port? Took up too much realestate?? > > We have rack kits for them, but Ive only just unpacked

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

2016-01-16 Thread Reuben Farrelly via cisco-nsp
--- Begin Message --- On 16/01/2016 10:43 PM, Gert Doering wrote: Hi, On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 09:07:00AM +, CiscoNSP List wrote: Cheers for the replies guys - I'm really interested in the rational behind moving to USB from traditional RJ45 portsrealestate?boggles the mind.

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

2016-01-16 Thread Nathan Ward
> On 17/01/2016, at 00:03, Erik Sundberg wrote: > > cisco ASR-920-24SZ-M > > Rack mount Brackets -- more like the cisco 2901 rack mount brackets > http://imgur.com/MpXp8li Ahh right, the ASR-920-4SZ-A model (which I have) isn’t as wide, so the brackets take up the

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

2016-01-16 Thread Erik Sundberg
Nah... The next model will be console via bluetooth. > On Jan 16, 2016, at 6:27 AM, Gert Doering wrote: > > Hi, > >> On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 12:11:59PM +, Nick Hilliard wrote: >> Gert Doering wrote: >>> - for those with classic serial ports, or modem needs, there is a

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

2016-01-16 Thread CiscoNSP List
[c-nsp] ASR920 "console" portugh > On 16/01/2016, at 22:03, CiscoNSP List <cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks Nathan - I really question Cisco's thought processwhat was "wrong" > with the traditional style RJ45 console port? Took up too much

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

2016-01-16 Thread Erik Sundberg
cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of CiscoNSP List Sent: Saturday, January 16, 2016 3:33 AM To: Nathan Ward <cisco-...@daork.net> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" portugh Cheers Nathan...sane logic appears to

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

2016-01-16 Thread Erik Sundberg
, January 16, 2016 4:54 AM To: Erik Sundberg <esundb...@nitelusa.com> Cc: CiscoNSP List <cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com>; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" portugh > On 16/01/2016, at 23:51, Erik Sundberg <esundb...@nitelusa.com> wrote: > &

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

2016-01-16 Thread Erik Sundberg
AM To: Erik Sundberg <esundb...@nitelusa.com> Cc: CiscoNSP List <cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com>; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" portugh > On 16/01/2016, at 23:51, Erik Sundberg <esundb...@nitelusa.com> wrote: > > M

[c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

2016-01-15 Thread CiscoNSP List
Hi everyone, I see the ASR920 doesnt have the "traditional" console port, but uses USBthen you have to install special driver on your Lappy/whatever that turns the USB into a "console" port (So you can access it via putty etc.) While painful(But works), my other issue is with how to

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

2016-01-15 Thread Nathan Ward
> On 16/01/2016, at 20:46, CiscoNSP List wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I see the ASR920 doesnt have the "traditional" console port, but uses > USBthen you have to install special driver on your Lappy/whatever that > turns the USB into a "console" port (So

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

2016-01-15 Thread Nathan Ward
> On 16/01/2016, at 20:54, Gert Doering wrote: > > Hi, > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 08:50:49PM +1300, Nathan Ward wrote: >> Hi, there is both a USB signalled console port, and an RS232 console. >> The RS232 console uses a USB style connector, which is very, very poor. >

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

2016-01-15 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 08:50:49PM +1300, Nathan Ward wrote: > Hi, there is both a USB signalled console port, and an RS232 console. > The RS232 console uses a USB style connector, which is very, very poor. Is that the "EIA console" port? On an USB A-type connector? > Cisco sell a cable