-nsp] ASR920 "console" portugh
Since is ASR920 bashing time ... anyone else noticed the red led ?
Apparently red is the new green.
--
Best regards,
Adrian Minta
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.n
12:30 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" portugh
Since is ASR920 bashing time ... anyone else noticed the red led ?
Apparently red is the new green.
--
Best regards,
Adrian Minta
___
cisco-nsp ma
Since is ASR920 bashing time ... anyone else noticed the red led ?
Apparently red is the new green.
--
Best regards,
Adrian Minta
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
-nsp] ASR920 "console" portugh
Since is ASR920 bashing time ... anyone else noticed the red led ?
Apparently red is the new green.
--
Best regards,
Adrian Minta
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.n
> On 2/02/2016, at 17:32, Erik Sundberg wrote:
>
> Here are some pictures of the ASR920 Console kit A920-CONS-KIT-S
>
>
> The Adapter Plugs in the Top Left USB Console Port and we have it wired up to
> a Perle IOLAN SCS48C console server using a rollover cable.
>
>
the cisco docs.
http://imgur.com/a/w8clL
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Phil
Mayers
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 5:15 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" portugh
On 17/01/16 11:10,
On 17/01/16 11:10, Saku Ytti wrote:
On 17 January 2016 at 04:04, Erik Sundberg wrote:
Nah... The next model will be console via bluetooth.
I would hope people include in their RFPs true OOB as requirement. I
think only one in networking market doing that is Cisco in
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 02:04:25AM +, Erik Sundberg wrote:
> Nah... The next model will be console via bluetooth.
Which would be nice, if it did not require a proprietary client app that
only works on Windows 7, and only with a particular bluetooth chip that
is out of production.
On 17 January 2016 at 04:04, Erik Sundberg wrote:
> Nah... The next model will be console via bluetooth.
I would hope people include in their RFPs true OOB as requirement. I
think only one in networking market doing that is Cisco in their
products with CMP. So Nexus7k
Gert Doering wrote:
> - for those with classic serial ports, or modem needs, there is a standard
>serial console with *standard* layout (read: Cisco RJ45)
i'm half expecting the ASR930 (if/when it ever happens) to come with the
following:
http://i.imgur.com/iCdq3Qt.jpg
Nick
> On 16/01/2016, at 22:07, CiscoNSP List wrote:
>
>
> Cheers for the replies guys - I'm really interested in the rational behind
> moving to USB from traditional RJ45 portsrealestate?boggles the mind.
Yeah I presume so.
An RJ45 with two USB A holes
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 12:11:59PM +, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Gert Doering wrote:
> > - for those with classic serial ports, or modem needs, there is a standard
> >serial console with *standard* layout (read: Cisco RJ45)
>
> i'm half expecting the ASR930 (if/when it ever happens) to
m assuming they will be very inexpensive
lol
Cheers.
From: Nathan Ward <cisco-...@daork.net>
Sent: Saturday, 16 January 2016 6:50 PM
To: CiscoNSP List
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" portugh
> On 16/01/
> On 16/01/2016, at 23:51, Erik Sundberg wrote:
>
> My rack mount brackets don't look like that...
Interesting! Post a pic?
--
Nathan Ward
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 09:07:00AM +, CiscoNSP List wrote:
> Cheers for the replies guys - I'm really interested in the rational behind
> moving to USB from traditional RJ45 portsrealestate?boggles the mind.
Well, if done properly, it's actually easier to the admins than having
ing
Cc: CiscoNSP List; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" portugh
On 16/01/2016, at 20:54, Gert Doering
<g...@greenie.muc.de<mailto:g...@greenie.muc.de>> wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 08:50:49PM +1300, Nathan Ward wrote:
Hi, there is both
> On 16/01/2016, at 22:03, CiscoNSP List wrote:
>
> Thanks Nathan - I really question Cisco's thought processwhat was "wrong"
> with the traditional style RJ45 console port? Took up too much realestate??
>
> We have rack kits for them, but Ive only just unpacked
--- Begin Message ---
On 16/01/2016 10:43 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 09:07:00AM +, CiscoNSP List wrote:
Cheers for the replies guys - I'm really interested in the rational
behind moving to USB from traditional RJ45
portsrealestate?boggles the mind.
> On 17/01/2016, at 00:03, Erik Sundberg wrote:
>
> cisco ASR-920-24SZ-M
>
> Rack mount Brackets -- more like the cisco 2901 rack mount brackets
> http://imgur.com/MpXp8li
Ahh right, the ASR-920-4SZ-A model (which I have) isn’t as wide, so the
brackets take up the
Nah... The next model will be console via bluetooth.
> On Jan 16, 2016, at 6:27 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 12:11:59PM +, Nick Hilliard wrote:
>> Gert Doering wrote:
>>> - for those with classic serial ports, or modem needs, there is a
[c-nsp] ASR920 "console" portugh
> On 16/01/2016, at 22:03, CiscoNSP List <cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Nathan - I really question Cisco's thought processwhat was "wrong"
> with the traditional style RJ45 console port? Took up too much
cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
CiscoNSP List
Sent: Saturday, January 16, 2016 3:33 AM
To: Nathan Ward <cisco-...@daork.net>
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" portugh
Cheers Nathan...sane logic appears to
, January 16, 2016 4:54 AM
To: Erik Sundberg <esundb...@nitelusa.com>
Cc: CiscoNSP List <cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com>; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" portugh
> On 16/01/2016, at 23:51, Erik Sundberg <esundb...@nitelusa.com> wrote:
>
&
AM
To: Erik Sundberg <esundb...@nitelusa.com>
Cc: CiscoNSP List <cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com>; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" portugh
> On 16/01/2016, at 23:51, Erik Sundberg <esundb...@nitelusa.com> wrote:
>
> M
Hi everyone,
I see the ASR920 doesnt have the "traditional" console port, but uses
USBthen you have to install special driver on your Lappy/whatever that
turns the USB into a "console" port (So you can access it via putty etc.)
While painful(But works), my other issue is with how to
> On 16/01/2016, at 20:46, CiscoNSP List wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
>
>
> I see the ASR920 doesnt have the "traditional" console port, but uses
> USBthen you have to install special driver on your Lappy/whatever that
> turns the USB into a "console" port (So
> On 16/01/2016, at 20:54, Gert Doering wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 08:50:49PM +1300, Nathan Ward wrote:
>> Hi, there is both a USB signalled console port, and an RS232 console.
>> The RS232 console uses a USB style connector, which is very, very poor.
>
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 08:50:49PM +1300, Nathan Ward wrote:
> Hi, there is both a USB signalled console port, and an RS232 console.
> The RS232 console uses a USB style connector, which is very, very poor.
Is that the "EIA console" port? On an USB A-type connector?
> Cisco sell a cable
28 matches
Mail list logo