Re: [c-nsp] ASR9k from 6.1.4 to 6.2.3

2018-05-30 Thread adamv0025
> James Bensley > Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 10:56 AM > > >> On 29 May 2018, at 18:53, Erik Sundberg > wrote: > >> I ran into this bug going from 6.3.1 to 6.3.2 Very simple fix by applying > to smu patch files. > >> https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvf01652?emailclick=C > >

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9k from 6.1.4 to 6.2.3

2018-05-30 Thread James Bensley
>> On 29 May 2018, at 18:53, Erik Sundberg wrote: >> I ran into this bug going from 6.3.1 to 6.3.2 Very simple fix by >> applying to smu patch files. >> https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvf01652?emailclick=CNSemail >> >> Not sure when this change in behavior happened, but by d

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9k from 6.1.4 to 6.2.3

2018-05-30 Thread Mark Tinka
On 29/May/18 18:52, Erik Sundberg wrote: > I ran into this bug going from 6.3.1 to 6.3.2 Very simple fix by > applying to smu patch files. > https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvf01652?emailclick=CNSemail > > > > Not sure when this change in behavior happened, but by default

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9k from 6.1.4 to 6.2.3

2018-05-29 Thread Erik Sundberg
; Cisco-nsp Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR9k from 6.1.4 to 6.2.3 Hi Erik, That is the default of XR. Best Regards Ted Sent while walking > On 29 May 2018, at 18:53, Erik Sundberg wrote: > > I ran into this bug going from 6.3.1 to 6.3.2 Very simple fix by > applying to smu patch fil

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9k from 6.1.4 to 6.2.3

2018-05-29 Thread Ted Pelas Johansson
et] On Behalf Of James > Bensley > Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2018 3:30 AM > To: Cisco-nsp > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR9k from 6.1.4 to 6.2.3 > >> On 28 May 2018 at 19:54, George Giannousopoulos wrote: >> We recently upgraded without any issue. > ... >> Beware of some rather

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9k from 6.1.4 to 6.2.3

2018-05-29 Thread Erik Sundberg
--- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of James Bensley Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2018 3:30 AM To: Cisco-nsp Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR9k from 6.1.4 to 6.2.3 On 28 May 2018 at 19:54, George Giannousopoulos wrote: > We recently upgraded without any issue. ... >

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9k from 6.1.4 to 6.2.3

2018-05-29 Thread James Bensley
On 28 May 2018 at 19:54, George Giannousopoulos wrote: > We recently upgraded without any issue. ... > Beware of some rather minor syntax changes in the BNG config Same here, we're migrating from 5.3.3 to 6.2.3. Everything seems fine for us too, we're also not doing anything crazy, L2/L3 VPNs, R

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9k from 6.1.4 to 6.2.3

2018-05-28 Thread George Giannousopoulos
Hi Adam, We recently upgraded without any issue. Not using any exotic features though.. Mostly L2VPN (VPLS & VPWS) services and MPLS L3VPN in smaller scale. Beware of some rather minor syntax changes in the BNG config, that can can ruin your whole day (or night..or both..) You better try your con

[c-nsp] ASR9k from 6.1.4 to 6.2.3

2018-05-28 Thread adamv0025
Hi folks, Considering upgrade from ASR9k 6.1.4 to 6.2.3 (32bit) I'm especially curious about automation advantages so naturally my preference would be for the later code, but wanted to reach out to wider audience for a view. Anything to be aware of, some bridge SMUs or nasty bugs, please let me kn