Drew Weaver wrote on 31/01/2024 14:12:
I know it is not the same but if it can do
1x100GE,1x100GE,1x100GE,1x100GE it would sort of follow that it can
do 1x100GE,1x100GE,1x100GE,10x10GE
tbh this will depend on the hardware and how the gearboxes are set up.
For example if you had a single
one port from each
slice for each 'service'.
That is just my opinion though.
Thanks,
-Drew
-Original Message-
From: Nick Hilliard
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2024 9:06 AM
To: Drew Weaver
Cc: 'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net'
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Acceptable port configurations for ASR
Drew Weaver via cisco-nsp wrote on 31/01/2024 14:00:
So having a 1x100GE,1x100GE,4x25GE,10x10GE option and not a
1x100GE,1x100GE,1x100GE,10x10GE option is just... laziness I guess is
how I would describe it.
4x25G is not the same as 1x100G - sounds like there's some weird gearbox
stuff going on
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Acceptable port configurations for ASR 9902 (gripe)
On 26/01/2024 15:49, Drew Weaver via cisco-nsp wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just have a general gripe that I want to share regarding the ASR9902 and
> since there is nobody to talk to at Cisco about any of thi
On 26/01/2024 15:49, Drew Weaver via cisco-nsp wrote:
Hello,
I just have a general gripe that I want to share regarding the ASR9902 and
since there is nobody to talk to at Cisco about any of this anymore, I figured
I would just share it here.
This is an acceptable configuration:
1x100GE,
Hello,
I just have a general gripe that I want to share regarding the ASR9902 and
since there is nobody to talk to at Cisco about any of this anymore, I figured
I would just share it here.
This is an acceptable configuration:
1x100GE, 1x100GE, 4x25GE, 10x10GE
But this is not:
1x100GE,
