Thanks for yout input stephen!
I will be running BGP for Internet access. I need to route a /24 or /23
public IP address to the network.
config for bandwidth would be on one site is 2x1MB link and on another site
is 1x1MB and 1x2MB link.
both are using Cisco 2851 routers.
chris
On 9/2/07,
In my experience 256 is the absolute minimum, but if you are planning to
receive the entire routing table please get 1GB.
BGP is more a function of memory and not link size. CPU will only come into
play if you have frequent BGP routing table updates.
On 9/6/07, Dracul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm I have to express some concern over the summary of responses.
The responders dont know much about your implementation, when asked
'will this router run BGP' the answer was yes but that doesnt mean
that the router will do its job correctly.
What isnt know is what you are trying to acheive
Thanks for the inputs all. 1MB and 1MB link, 2MB and 1MB bandwidth for BGP
would also
not pose a problem implementing right?
On 8/31/07, Hyunseog Ryu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree on Mark's assessment for memory upgrade.
If you are concerned about cost, you can find third party memory from
On Sat, 1 Sep 2007, Dracul wrote:
Thanks for the inputs all. 1MB and 1MB link, 2MB and 1MB bandwidth for BGP
would also
not pose a problem implementing right?
Correct. BGP doesn't take link bandwidth into account when calculating
the best route to reach a destination.
jms
I agree on Mark's assessment for memory upgrade.
If you are concerned about cost, you can find third party memory from
kingston or some other well-known manufacturers.
It is good idea to upgrade memory to max, so you don't have to shutdown
the router to upgrade it again.
Also, BGP may use lots of
It seems that 2851 is more than enough to route two links at 1 or 2 Mb/s. As
Cisco says, 2851 is capable to route at speed of 112 Mb/s, but in real world
you should devide this value by 2 at least.
As I see this devise has 256 Mb of memory. It is enaugh for default and
several specific routes but
PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] BGP hardware requirements
Hi All is BGP configuration ok for these scenarios?
1MB and 2MB leased line link
1MB and 1MB leased line link
(also its a v.35 and fastethernet combo)
what would be the best setup? Full routes? Def routes?
Here's
: [c-nsp] BGP hardware requirements
Hi All is BGP configuration ok for these scenarios?
1MB and 2MB leased line link
1MB and 1MB leased line link
(also its a v.35 and fastethernet combo)
what would be the best setup? Full routes? Def routes?
Here's the show version of the router I
Not according to Feature Navigator (http://www.cisco.com/go/fn/)
Alex
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bernd
Ueberbacher
Sent: Thursday, 30 August 2007 5:39 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BGP hardware requirements
://www.cisco.com/go/fn/)
Alex
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bernd
Ueberbacher
Sent: Thursday, 30 August 2007 5:39 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BGP hardware requirements
I agree with the point that you
: Thursday, 30 August 2007 3:31 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] BGP hardware requirements
Hi All is BGP configuration ok for these scenarios?
1MB and 2MB leased line link
1MB and 1MB leased line link
(also its a v.35 and fastethernet combo)
what would be the best
On Thursday 30 August 2007 17:51, Dracul wrote:
1. My 2851 is already ok for 2x 2MB link BGP
Right.
2. I need to upgrade my 256MB memory to 512 MB
I would say take the full 1GB. It's always best to max. out
the memory on the routers so you have one less problem to
worry about, especially
Hi All is BGP configuration ok for these scenarios?
1MB and 2MB leased line link
1MB and 1MB leased line link
(also its a v.35 and fastethernet combo)
what would be the best setup? Full routes? Def routes?
Here's the show version of the router I will be using. can it support BGP?
=
Cisco
14 matches
Mail list logo
