From:* Mattias Gyllenvarg <matt...@gyllenvarg.se>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 5, 2016 3:04 AM
> *To:* Maile Halatuituia
>
> *Subject:* Re: [c-nsp] BGP with MPLS
> You do not need MPLS to carry the traffic.
>
> But you will offcourse loose all the features MPLS adds
l be working
>
> I hope i am not add confusion to my question.
>
> Cheers.
>
> Maile.
> --
> *From:* Mattias Gyllenvarg <matt...@gyllenvarg.se>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 5, 2016 3:04 AM
> *To:* Maile Halatuituia
>
> *Subj
ctober 5, 2016 3:04 AM
To: Maile Halatuituia
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BGP with MPLS
You do not need MPLS to carry the traffic.
But you will offcourse loose all the features MPLS adds to regular data-link
capabilites.
tis 4 okt. 2016 kl 05:00 skrev Maile Halatuituia
<maile.halatuit.
@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BGP with MPLS
On 4 October 2016 at 04:00, Maile Halatuituia <maile.halatuit...@tcc.to> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Can i do BGP without MPLS between my two PE routers.
>
> My question is to my understabd that BGP carry the means of reachability
On 4 October 2016 at 04:00, Maile Halatuituia wrote:
> Hi
>
> Can i do BGP without MPLS between my two PE routers.
>
> My question is to my understabd that BGP carry the means of reachability
> between the two PE but it is the mpls actually carry the traffic. Can
Hi
Can i do BGP without MPLS between my two PE routers.
My question is to my understabd that BGP carry the means of reachability
between the two PE but it is the mpls actually carry the traffic. Can someone
correct me if i am wrong or suggest any best approach to this.
The reason is that my