Re: [c-nsp] BGP with MPLS

2016-10-05 Thread Mattias Gyllenvarg
From:* Mattias Gyllenvarg <matt...@gyllenvarg.se> > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 5, 2016 3:04 AM > *To:* Maile Halatuituia > > *Subject:* Re: [c-nsp] BGP with MPLS > You do not need MPLS to carry the traffic. > > But you will offcourse loose all the features MPLS adds

Re: [c-nsp] BGP with MPLS

2016-10-05 Thread Mattias Gyllenvarg
l be working > > I hope i am not add confusion to my question. > > Cheers. > > Maile. > -- > *From:* Mattias Gyllenvarg <matt...@gyllenvarg.se> > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 5, 2016 3:04 AM > *To:* Maile Halatuituia > > *Subj

Re: [c-nsp] BGP with MPLS

2016-10-04 Thread Maile Halatuituia
ctober 5, 2016 3:04 AM To: Maile Halatuituia Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BGP with MPLS You do not need MPLS to carry the traffic. But you will offcourse loose all the features MPLS adds to regular data-link capabilites. tis 4 okt. 2016 kl 05:00 skrev Maile Halatuituia <maile.halatuit.

Re: [c-nsp] BGP with MPLS

2016-10-04 Thread Nick Cutting
@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BGP with MPLS On 4 October 2016 at 04:00, Maile Halatuituia <maile.halatuit...@tcc.to> wrote: > Hi > > Can i do BGP without MPLS between my two PE routers. > > My question is to my understabd that BGP carry the means of reachability

Re: [c-nsp] BGP with MPLS

2016-10-04 Thread James Bensley
On 4 October 2016 at 04:00, Maile Halatuituia wrote: > Hi > > Can i do BGP without MPLS between my two PE routers. > > My question is to my understabd that BGP carry the means of reachability > between the two PE but it is the mpls actually carry the traffic. Can

[c-nsp] BGP with MPLS

2016-10-03 Thread Maile Halatuituia
Hi Can i do BGP without MPLS between my two PE routers. My question is to my understabd that BGP carry the means of reachability between the two PE but it is the mpls actually carry the traffic. Can someone correct me if i am wrong or suggest any best approach to this. The reason is that my