Re: [c-nsp] C3560 as CPE, possible TCAM contention

2008-04-29 Thread Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
Hi Peter, I usually use the following: sh controllers cpu-interface sh platform ip unicast counts sh platform ip unicast failed sh ip cef switching statistics feature But from your tcam output, i see IPv4 unicast indirectly-connected routes are close to max (1921/2176). You also said about

Re: [c-nsp] C3560 as CPE, possible TCAM contention

2008-04-29 Thread Brian Turnbow
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Rathlev Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 4:11 PM To: cisco-nsp Subject: [c-nsp] C3560 as CPE, possible TCAM contention Hi, I'm looking at some C3560s acting CPEs. One of them has 13 VRFs in a VRF Lite

Re: [c-nsp] C3560 as CPE, possible TCAM contention

2008-04-29 Thread Peter Rathlev
Thank you Tassos and Brian. Of course it was decided to just change to SDM and reboot, so now we can't test any more. :-( The problem seems to have disappeared though. I think I'll try and set up a test box with the same FIB-entries and SDM template, just to see if I can reproduce the behaviour.